Diagnostic Accuracy of Spleen-Dedicated 100 Hz Transient Elastography to Predict High-Risk Esophageal Varices.

IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Jain Harsh Prakash, Prajna Anirvan, Shubham Gupta, Mohd Imran Chouhan, Mansi Chaudhary, Biswajit Sahoo, Hemanta Kumar Nayak, Manas Kumar Panigrahi
{"title":"Diagnostic Accuracy of Spleen-Dedicated 100 Hz Transient Elastography to Predict High-Risk Esophageal Varices.","authors":"Jain Harsh Prakash, Prajna Anirvan, Shubham Gupta, Mohd Imran Chouhan, Mansi Chaudhary, Biswajit Sahoo, Hemanta Kumar Nayak, Manas Kumar Panigrahi","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Baveno VII consensus suggested different splenic stiffness measurement (SSM) cut-offs to predict High-Risk Esophageal Varices (HREV) and clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) in patients with cirrhosis. Few studies have validated these cut-offs using spleen-dedicated 100 Hz transient elastography (TE). We have assessed the diagnostic performance of SSM in predicting HREV and CSPH using a spleen-dedicated 100 Hz TE and compared it with other noninvasive algorithms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a single-centre prospective study including patients with cirrhosis. Endoscopy, spleen-dedicated TE, and laboratory investigations were performed for all participants. A new SSM cut-off to rule out HREV was derived from our cohort. Its performance was compared with existing algorithms by determining endoscopy spare rate and HREV miss rate. The cut-offs suggested by the Baveno VII consensus for predicting HREV and CSPH were compared with the new SSM cut-off value.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HREV were present in 33 (28.4%) of 116 patients (97 compensated and 19 recompensated cirrhosis). The Area under Receiver Operating Curve of SSM, liver stiffness measurement (LSM) alone, combination of LSM and platelet count (PC), and combination of LSM, PC, and SSM were 0.849, 0.683, 0.808, and 0.864, respectively. An SSM cut-off value of 35 kPa in compensated cirrhosis had a corresponding sensitivity of 95.6%. On extrapolating this cut-off in the overall cohort, SSM alone spared more endoscopies as compared with the Baveno VI criteria combining LSM and PC (44.8% vs 21.5%) and had a lower HREV miss rate as compared with the Baveno VII criteria for HREV (6.1% vs 15.1%). The combination of LSM, PC, and SSM narrowed the gray zone of CSPH to 12.9% when the single value of SSM cut-off derived from this study (35 kPa) was used.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>SSM alone can accurately predict HREV in cirrhosis, and its combination with LSM and PC precisely predicted CSPH, saving a significant number of endoscopies. The SSM cut-off to rule out HREV may vary with etiology.</p>","PeriodicalId":7608,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003741","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The Baveno VII consensus suggested different splenic stiffness measurement (SSM) cut-offs to predict High-Risk Esophageal Varices (HREV) and clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) in patients with cirrhosis. Few studies have validated these cut-offs using spleen-dedicated 100 Hz transient elastography (TE). We have assessed the diagnostic performance of SSM in predicting HREV and CSPH using a spleen-dedicated 100 Hz TE and compared it with other noninvasive algorithms.

Methods: This is a single-centre prospective study including patients with cirrhosis. Endoscopy, spleen-dedicated TE, and laboratory investigations were performed for all participants. A new SSM cut-off to rule out HREV was derived from our cohort. Its performance was compared with existing algorithms by determining endoscopy spare rate and HREV miss rate. The cut-offs suggested by the Baveno VII consensus for predicting HREV and CSPH were compared with the new SSM cut-off value.

Results: HREV were present in 33 (28.4%) of 116 patients (97 compensated and 19 recompensated cirrhosis). The Area under Receiver Operating Curve of SSM, liver stiffness measurement (LSM) alone, combination of LSM and platelet count (PC), and combination of LSM, PC, and SSM were 0.849, 0.683, 0.808, and 0.864, respectively. An SSM cut-off value of 35 kPa in compensated cirrhosis had a corresponding sensitivity of 95.6%. On extrapolating this cut-off in the overall cohort, SSM alone spared more endoscopies as compared with the Baveno VI criteria combining LSM and PC (44.8% vs 21.5%) and had a lower HREV miss rate as compared with the Baveno VII criteria for HREV (6.1% vs 15.1%). The combination of LSM, PC, and SSM narrowed the gray zone of CSPH to 12.9% when the single value of SSM cut-off derived from this study (35 kPa) was used.

Discussion: SSM alone can accurately predict HREV in cirrhosis, and its combination with LSM and PC precisely predicted CSPH, saving a significant number of endoscopies. The SSM cut-off to rule out HREV may vary with etiology.

脾脏专用100hz瞬时弹性成像预测高危食管静脉曲张的诊断准确性。
Baveno VII共识提示,不同的SSM截断值可预测肝硬化患者的高危食管静脉曲张(HREV)和临床显著性门脉高压(CSPH)。很少有研究使用脾脏专用的100赫兹TE来验证这些截止值。我们使用脾脏专用的100 Hz TE评估了SSM在预测HREV和CSPH方面的诊断性能,并将其与其他无创算法进行了比较。方法:这是一项纳入肝硬化患者的单中心前瞻性研究。对所有参与者进行内窥镜检查、脾脏专用TE和实验室检查。从我们的队列中得出了一个新的SSM截止值来排除HREV。通过确定内窥镜备用率和HREV漏检率,比较了现有算法的性能。将Baveno VII共识建议的预测HREV和CSPH的截止值与新的SSM截止值进行比较。结果:116例患者中有33例(28.4%)存在HREV,其中代偿性肝硬化97例,再代偿性肝硬化19例。SSM、LSM单用、LSM与血小板计数(PC)联用、LSM、PC与SSM联用的AUROC分别为0.849、0.683、0.808、0.864。代偿性肝硬化的SSM临界值为35 kPa,相应的敏感性为95.6%。在整个队列中推断这一截止点,与LSM和PC联合的Baveno VI标准相比,SSM单独省去了更多的内窥镜检查(44.8%比21.5%),与Baveno VII标准相比,HREV漏报率更低(6.1%比15.1%)。当使用本研究得出的SSM截止单值(35 kPa)时,LSM、PC和SSM的组合将CSPH的灰色区域缩小到12.9%。结论:单纯SSM可准确预测肝硬化HREV,联合LSM、PC可准确预测CSPH,节省大量内窥镜检查。排除HREV的SSM截止值可能因病因而异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Gastroenterology
American Journal of Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
458
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), The American Journal of Gastroenterology (AJG) stands as the foremost clinical journal in the fields of gastroenterology and hepatology. AJG offers practical and professional support to clinicians addressing the most prevalent gastroenterological disorders in patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信