{"title":"Impact of Myocardial Bridging on Hemodynamics Evaluated by Coronary Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve","authors":"Yiqun Shi MD, Jian Liu MD","doi":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.08.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Myocardial bridging (MB) is a kind of congenital coronary abnormality. The functional impact of MB on coronary artery remains a subject of debate. This study aimed to assess the hemodynamic effects of MB using coronary angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (caFFR) and elucidate the relationship between MB anatomical parameters and diastolic caFFR (dcaFFR) in patients with isolated MB (iMB) and MB combined with proximal coronary atherosclerosis (MB+AS). A total of 683 patients diagnosed with MB located on left anterior descending (LAD) via coronary angiography (CAG) were retrospectively enrolled and categorized into two groups: iMB (n = 377) and MB+AS (n = 306). The dcaFFR was calculated to evaluate the hemodynamic impact of MB. Multivariate linear regression and mediation analysis were performed to identify predictors of dcaFFR. In the iMB group, diastolic minimal lumen diameter (MLD) of MB segment was the sole independent predictor of dcaFFR (<em>B</em> = 0.036, <em>β</em> = 0.253, p <0.001). In the group of MB+AS, the severity of proximal stenosis emerged as the only independent predictor of dcaFFR (<em>B</em> = −0.004, <em>β</em> = −0.674, p <0.001), with the hemodynamic effects of MB fully mediated by proximal stenosis. In conclusion, the hemodynamic impact of MB depends on the presence of proximal coronary atherosclerosis. In iMB cases, the diastolic MLD of MB segment directly determines hemodynamic impairment. However, the hemodynamic impact of MB is nonsignificant in cases of MB+AS, as its effect is fully mediated through proximal stenosis severity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7705,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiology","volume":"257 ","pages":"Pages 141-146"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002914925004850","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Myocardial bridging (MB) is a kind of congenital coronary abnormality. The functional impact of MB on coronary artery remains a subject of debate. This study aimed to assess the hemodynamic effects of MB using coronary angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (caFFR) and elucidate the relationship between MB anatomical parameters and diastolic caFFR (dcaFFR) in patients with isolated MB (iMB) and MB combined with proximal coronary atherosclerosis (MB+AS). A total of 683 patients diagnosed with MB located on left anterior descending (LAD) via coronary angiography (CAG) were retrospectively enrolled and categorized into two groups: iMB (n = 377) and MB+AS (n = 306). The dcaFFR was calculated to evaluate the hemodynamic impact of MB. Multivariate linear regression and mediation analysis were performed to identify predictors of dcaFFR. In the iMB group, diastolic minimal lumen diameter (MLD) of MB segment was the sole independent predictor of dcaFFR (B = 0.036, β = 0.253, p <0.001). In the group of MB+AS, the severity of proximal stenosis emerged as the only independent predictor of dcaFFR (B = −0.004, β = −0.674, p <0.001), with the hemodynamic effects of MB fully mediated by proximal stenosis. In conclusion, the hemodynamic impact of MB depends on the presence of proximal coronary atherosclerosis. In iMB cases, the diastolic MLD of MB segment directly determines hemodynamic impairment. However, the hemodynamic impact of MB is nonsignificant in cases of MB+AS, as its effect is fully mediated through proximal stenosis severity.
期刊介绍:
Published 24 times a year, The American Journal of Cardiology® is an independent journal designed for cardiovascular disease specialists and internists with a subspecialty in cardiology throughout the world. AJC is an independent, scientific, peer-reviewed journal of original articles that focus on the practical, clinical approach to the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. AJC has one of the fastest acceptance to publication times in Cardiology. Features report on systemic hypertension, methodology, drugs, pacing, arrhythmia, preventive cardiology, congestive heart failure, valvular heart disease, congenital heart disease, and cardiomyopathy. Also included are editorials, readers'' comments, and symposia.