Lindsay Reddeman, Justin W J Lim, Kellie E Murphy, David Fahmy, Chris Walsh, Kristin Harris
{"title":"Safety, effectiveness, and acceptability of antenatal penicillin allergy evaluation: a systematic review.","authors":"Lindsay Reddeman, Justin W J Lim, Kellie E Murphy, David Fahmy, Chris Walsh, Kristin Harris","doi":"10.1016/j.ajog.2025.08.033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Approximately 8% to 13% of pregnant patients report a penicillin allergy. Penicillins and other beta-lactams are widely used in pregnancy but are often avoided in these patients, resulting in suboptimal therapy, antimicrobial resistance, higher costs, and increased morbidity for patients and neonates. True penicillin allergy is rare, and 95% of unverified penicillin allergies are delabeled upon evaluation. Although penicillin allergy evaluation is safe and recommended for pregnant patients, few patients are assessed. Research concerning antenatal penicillin allergy evaluation is accelerating, and we undertook a systematic review to summarize this growing body of evidence for obstetrical providers. A comprehensive search of Medline, Embase, CINAHL, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed (ahead-of-print and non-Medline records), and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted in collaboration with a medical information specialist. There were no restrictions on study language, date, or design. All peer-reviewed studies of pregnant people reporting an unverified penicillin allergy and undergoing penicillin allergy evaluation with ≥5 participants were included. Case reports, non-peer-reviewed sources, and studies regarding desensitization of verified penicillin-allergic patients were excluded. Title/abstract review, full-text review, and data extraction were completed independently by 2 authors. Conflicts were resolved by a third author. Studies were evaluated using validated quality assessment tools. Nineteen studies (N=2085) were eligible for inclusion. In total, 1956 (93.81%) participants were delabeled through various approaches: direct oral challenge (18.61%), penicillin skin test and oral challenge (51.12%), penicillin skin test and intravenous challenge (2.97%), penicillin skin test alone (18.00%), history review (1.94%), and unspecified methods (7.41%). Acceptance of penicillin allergy evaluation was 60.88%. Overall, 17 mild and 8 mild delayed allergy-related adverse reactions occurred, requiring minimal intervention. There were 3 severe allergy-related adverse reactions: 2 participants experienced anaphylaxis (managed with intramuscular epinephrine and observation), and 1 patient had mild drug-induced hepatitis (resolved with observation). No hospital transfers were required. No adverse antenatal events were recorded. Penicillin allergy evaluation in pregnancy is safe, effective, and acceptable to patients. The case is strong for expanding access to optimize antimicrobial therapy, reduce antibiotic resistance, and improve outcomes for pregnant people and neonates.</p>","PeriodicalId":7574,"journal":{"name":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2025.08.033","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Approximately 8% to 13% of pregnant patients report a penicillin allergy. Penicillins and other beta-lactams are widely used in pregnancy but are often avoided in these patients, resulting in suboptimal therapy, antimicrobial resistance, higher costs, and increased morbidity for patients and neonates. True penicillin allergy is rare, and 95% of unverified penicillin allergies are delabeled upon evaluation. Although penicillin allergy evaluation is safe and recommended for pregnant patients, few patients are assessed. Research concerning antenatal penicillin allergy evaluation is accelerating, and we undertook a systematic review to summarize this growing body of evidence for obstetrical providers. A comprehensive search of Medline, Embase, CINAHL, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed (ahead-of-print and non-Medline records), and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted in collaboration with a medical information specialist. There were no restrictions on study language, date, or design. All peer-reviewed studies of pregnant people reporting an unverified penicillin allergy and undergoing penicillin allergy evaluation with ≥5 participants were included. Case reports, non-peer-reviewed sources, and studies regarding desensitization of verified penicillin-allergic patients were excluded. Title/abstract review, full-text review, and data extraction were completed independently by 2 authors. Conflicts were resolved by a third author. Studies were evaluated using validated quality assessment tools. Nineteen studies (N=2085) were eligible for inclusion. In total, 1956 (93.81%) participants were delabeled through various approaches: direct oral challenge (18.61%), penicillin skin test and oral challenge (51.12%), penicillin skin test and intravenous challenge (2.97%), penicillin skin test alone (18.00%), history review (1.94%), and unspecified methods (7.41%). Acceptance of penicillin allergy evaluation was 60.88%. Overall, 17 mild and 8 mild delayed allergy-related adverse reactions occurred, requiring minimal intervention. There were 3 severe allergy-related adverse reactions: 2 participants experienced anaphylaxis (managed with intramuscular epinephrine and observation), and 1 patient had mild drug-induced hepatitis (resolved with observation). No hospital transfers were required. No adverse antenatal events were recorded. Penicillin allergy evaluation in pregnancy is safe, effective, and acceptable to patients. The case is strong for expanding access to optimize antimicrobial therapy, reduce antibiotic resistance, and improve outcomes for pregnant people and neonates.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, known as "The Gray Journal," covers the entire spectrum of Obstetrics and Gynecology. It aims to publish original research (clinical and translational), reviews, opinions, video clips, podcasts, and interviews that contribute to understanding health and disease and have the potential to impact the practice of women's healthcare.
Focus Areas:
Diagnosis, Treatment, Prediction, and Prevention: The journal focuses on research related to the diagnosis, treatment, prediction, and prevention of obstetrical and gynecological disorders.
Biology of Reproduction: AJOG publishes work on the biology of reproduction, including studies on reproductive physiology and mechanisms of obstetrical and gynecological diseases.
Content Types:
Original Research: Clinical and translational research articles.
Reviews: Comprehensive reviews providing insights into various aspects of obstetrics and gynecology.
Opinions: Perspectives and opinions on important topics in the field.
Multimedia Content: Video clips, podcasts, and interviews.
Peer Review Process:
All submissions undergo a rigorous peer review process to ensure quality and relevance to the field of obstetrics and gynecology.