Surgical Dosing for Correction of Consecutive Exotropia

IF 4.2 1区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Qingyu Meng , Emanuil Parunakian , Veronika Yehezkeli , Joseph L. Demer
{"title":"Surgical Dosing for Correction of Consecutive Exotropia","authors":"Qingyu Meng ,&nbsp;Emanuil Parunakian ,&nbsp;Veronika Yehezkeli ,&nbsp;Joseph L. Demer","doi":"10.1016/j.ajo.2025.08.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>PURPOSE</h3><div>Because surgical tables have not previously been available for consecutive exotropia, this study aimed to determine the appropriate surgical dosing for medial rectus (MR) advancement in this condition.</div></div><div><h3>DESIGN</h3><div>Retrospective case series.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>Data were reviewed for patients with consecutive exotropia who underwent MR advancement with or without lateral rectus (LR) recession.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>A total of 44 patients were included averaging 35 ± 20 (stamdard deviation ) years of age. Mean preoperative exotropia was 29 ± 15∆ at distance and 33 ± 19∆ at near. Thirty-four patients underwent unilateral or bilateral MR advancement, and 10 patients underwent MR advancement combined with LR recession. For the MR advancement group, mean advancement was 4.9 ± 1.4 mm. At the last follow-up visit, exotropia at distance was reduced from 26 ± 12∆ to 7 ± 11∆. For the MR advancement + LR recession group, mean MR advancement was 6.2 ± 2.0 mm, and the mean total surgical dose, including LR recession, was 14.6 ± 4.7 mm. Overall, distance exotropia at last follow-up was surgically reduced from 39 ± 18∆ to 9 ± 14∆. Exodrift from initial to final follow-up was 6.6∆ for MR advancement alone and 7.5∆ for MR advancement + LR recession. Regression analysis of surgical dose-response suggests that each MR advancement should be augmented by 2 mm more than Parks' general surgical recommendation for treating exotropia by MR resection.</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>Augmentation of MR advancement may improve the correction of consecutive exotropia and is effective while affording opportunity to explore the MR muscle.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7568,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"280 ","pages":"Pages 176-181"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002939425004313","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PURPOSE

Because surgical tables have not previously been available for consecutive exotropia, this study aimed to determine the appropriate surgical dosing for medial rectus (MR) advancement in this condition.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

METHODS

Data were reviewed for patients with consecutive exotropia who underwent MR advancement with or without lateral rectus (LR) recession.

RESULTS

A total of 44 patients were included averaging 35 ± 20 (stamdard deviation ) years of age. Mean preoperative exotropia was 29 ± 15∆ at distance and 33 ± 19∆ at near. Thirty-four patients underwent unilateral or bilateral MR advancement, and 10 patients underwent MR advancement combined with LR recession. For the MR advancement group, mean advancement was 4.9 ± 1.4 mm. At the last follow-up visit, exotropia at distance was reduced from 26 ± 12∆ to 7 ± 11∆. For the MR advancement + LR recession group, mean MR advancement was 6.2 ± 2.0 mm, and the mean total surgical dose, including LR recession, was 14.6 ± 4.7 mm. Overall, distance exotropia at last follow-up was surgically reduced from 39 ± 18∆ to 9 ± 14∆. Exodrift from initial to final follow-up was 6.6∆ for MR advancement alone and 7.5∆ for MR advancement + LR recession. Regression analysis of surgical dose-response suggests that each MR advancement should be augmented by 2 mm more than Parks' general surgical recommendation for treating exotropia by MR resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Augmentation of MR advancement may improve the correction of consecutive exotropia and is effective while affording opportunity to explore the MR muscle.
矫正连续外斜视的手术剂量。
目的:由于之前没有连续外斜视的手术台面,本研究旨在确定这种情况下内侧直肌(MR)进展的合适手术剂量。设计:回顾性病例系列。方法:对伴有或不伴有侧直肌(LR)衰退的连续外斜视患者进行mri进展的数据进行回顾。结果:共纳入44例患者,平均年龄35±20岁(标准差)。术前平均远处外斜视29±15∆,近处外斜视33±19∆。34例患者单侧或双侧mri进展,10例mri进展合并LR衰退。MR进展组平均进展4.9±1.4mm。最后一次随访时,远处外斜视由26±12∆降至7±11∆。对于MR推进 + LR后退组,平均MR推进为6.2±2.0mm,包括LR后退的平均总手术剂量为14.6±4.7mm。总的来说,最后一次手术随访时,距离外斜视从39±18∆下降到9±14∆。从最初随访到最终随访,仅MR进展为6.6∆,MR进展 + LR衰退为7.5∆。手术剂量反应的回归分析表明,MR切除治疗外斜视时,每一次MR进展应比Parks的一般手术建议增加2mm。结论:增强MR进位可提高连续外斜视的矫正效果,并可提供探查MR肌的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
406
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Ophthalmology is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication that welcomes the submission of original, previously unpublished manuscripts directed to ophthalmologists and visual science specialists describing clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations. Published monthly since 1884, the full text of the American Journal of Ophthalmology and supplementary material are also presented online at www.AJO.com and on ScienceDirect. The American Journal of Ophthalmology publishes Full-Length Articles, Perspectives, Editorials, Correspondences, Books Reports and Announcements. Brief Reports and Case Reports are no longer published. We recommend submitting Brief Reports and Case Reports to our companion publication, the American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports. Manuscripts are accepted with the understanding that they have not been and will not be published elsewhere substantially in any format, and that there are no ethical problems with the content or data collection. Authors may be requested to produce the data upon which the manuscript is based and to answer expeditiously any questions about the manuscript or its authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信