An Open, Noncomparative, Clinical Follow-up Study to Confirm Performance and Safety of a Gelling Fiber Dressing When Used on Split-thickness Skin Graft Donor Sites.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Advances in Skin & Wound Care Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-14 DOI:10.1097/ASW.0000000000000337
Sinan Dogan, Anders Kjölhede, Matilda Karlsson
{"title":"An Open, Noncomparative, Clinical Follow-up Study to Confirm Performance and Safety of a Gelling Fiber Dressing When Used on Split-thickness Skin Graft Donor Sites.","authors":"Sinan Dogan, Anders Kjölhede, Matilda Karlsson","doi":"10.1097/ASW.0000000000000337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The performance of a gelling fiber dressing (GFD) was evaluated in adult patients undergoing split-thickness skin graft (STSG) transplantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A gelling fiber dressing was applied directly to the donor sites; a soft-silicone-coated foam was used as the secondary dressing. Follow-ups were scheduled for days 3 and 14, and day 21 for patients with donor sites that had not healed. The primary outcome measure was donor site progression from baseline to last visit when GFD was used. Secondary outcome measures included clinicians' and patients' evaluations of GFD performance, patients' evaluations of pain severity, dressing wear time, and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-nine of 33 participants (87.9%) had donor sites considered as \"improved\" at the final visit. Twenty (60.6%) donor sites were healed during the period when the GFD was used. High percentages of \"good\"/\"very good\" clinicians' ratings for the ability of GFD to absorb/retain exudate (93.3%), absorb/retain blood (96.6%), conform to the wound bed (96.8%), and maintain integrity when wet on removal (100%) were recorded. High percentages of \"good\"/\"very good\" patient ratings for comfort during wear (93.9%) and experience during dressing changes (86.6%) were also recorded. Mean pain score at GFD removal was 1.3, on a scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = worst imaginable. Median wear time per individual dressing was 14 days. Four adverse device events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings indicate the suitability of GFD for donor site management. The dressing, rated highly by clinicians and patients, was associated with good healing progression.</p>","PeriodicalId":7489,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Skin & Wound Care","volume":"38 8","pages":"433-441"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12345826/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Skin & Wound Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ASW.0000000000000337","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The performance of a gelling fiber dressing (GFD) was evaluated in adult patients undergoing split-thickness skin graft (STSG) transplantation.

Methods: A gelling fiber dressing was applied directly to the donor sites; a soft-silicone-coated foam was used as the secondary dressing. Follow-ups were scheduled for days 3 and 14, and day 21 for patients with donor sites that had not healed. The primary outcome measure was donor site progression from baseline to last visit when GFD was used. Secondary outcome measures included clinicians' and patients' evaluations of GFD performance, patients' evaluations of pain severity, dressing wear time, and adverse events.

Results: Twenty-nine of 33 participants (87.9%) had donor sites considered as "improved" at the final visit. Twenty (60.6%) donor sites were healed during the period when the GFD was used. High percentages of "good"/"very good" clinicians' ratings for the ability of GFD to absorb/retain exudate (93.3%), absorb/retain blood (96.6%), conform to the wound bed (96.8%), and maintain integrity when wet on removal (100%) were recorded. High percentages of "good"/"very good" patient ratings for comfort during wear (93.9%) and experience during dressing changes (86.6%) were also recorded. Mean pain score at GFD removal was 1.3, on a scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = worst imaginable. Median wear time per individual dressing was 14 days. Four adverse device events were reported.

Conclusions: The findings indicate the suitability of GFD for donor site management. The dressing, rated highly by clinicians and patients, was associated with good healing progression.

Abstract Image

一项开放的、非比比性的临床随访研究,以确认胶凝纤维敷料用于裂厚皮肤移植供体部位的性能和安全性。
目的:评价胶凝纤维敷料(GFD)在成人裂皮移植(STSG)中的应用效果。方法:将胶凝纤维敷料直接敷于供区;软硅包覆泡沫作为二次敷料。随访时间为第3天和第14天,对于供体部位未愈合的患者,随访时间为第21天。主要结局指标是使用GFD时供体部位从基线到最后一次就诊的进展情况。次要结局指标包括临床医生和患者对GFD表现的评价、患者对疼痛严重程度、敷料磨损时间和不良事件的评价。结果:33名参与者中有29名(87.9%)的供体部位在最后一次访问时被认为是“改善”的。20例(60.6%)供体部位在使用GFD期间愈合。临床医生对GFD吸收/保留渗出液(93.3%)、吸收/保留血液(96.6%)、符合伤口床(96.8%)和去除湿性时保持完整性(100%)的能力评分为“好”/“非常好”。患者在穿着舒适度(93.9%)和换药体验(86.6%)方面的“良好”/“非常好”评分比例也很高。GFD移除时的平均疼痛评分为1.3,评分范围从0 =无疼痛到10 =最糟糕。每个人的平均穿着时间为14天。报告了4例不良器械事件。结论:本研究结果表明了GFD在供区管理中的适用性。临床医生和患者高度评价这种敷料与良好的愈合进展有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Skin & Wound Care
Advances in Skin & Wound Care DERMATOLOGY-NURSING
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
271
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal, Advances in Skin & Wound Care is highly regarded for its unique balance of cutting-edge original research and practical clinical management articles on wounds and other problems of skin integrity. Each issue features CME/CE for physicians and nurses, the first journal in the field to regularly offer continuing education for both disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信