Validating and leveraging non-SARS-CoV-2 respiratory infection as a negative control outcome in a phase 3 COVID-19 vaccine trial with extended observational follow-up.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ethan Ashby, Holly Janes, Dean Follmann, Peter B Gilbert, Honghong Zhou, Xiaowei Wang, Bethany Girard, Frances Priddy, James G Kublin, Lawrence Corey, Kathleen M Neuzil, Lindsey R Baden, Hana M El Sahly, Bo Zhang, On Behalf Of Cove Study Group
{"title":"Validating and leveraging non-SARS-CoV-2 respiratory infection as a negative control outcome in a phase 3 COVID-19 vaccine trial with extended observational follow-up.","authors":"Ethan Ashby, Holly Janes, Dean Follmann, Peter B Gilbert, Honghong Zhou, Xiaowei Wang, Bethany Girard, Frances Priddy, James G Kublin, Lawrence Corey, Kathleen M Neuzil, Lindsey R Baden, Hana M El Sahly, Bo Zhang, On Behalf Of Cove Study Group","doi":"10.1093/aje/kwaf176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Negative control outcomes (NCOs) are useful tools for hidden bias detection, but empirical evidence validating NCOs for COVID-19 is lacking. To address this gap, we examined the blinded phase of the randomized, placebo-controlled Coronavirus Vaccine Efficacy (COVE; NCT04470427) trial of the mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccine. We confirmed that acute respiratory illness with a positive test for a non-SARS-CoV-2 respiratory pathogen on a multiplex PCR panel was a valid NCO for COVID-19, considering that it was unaffected by vaccination (vaccine efficacy, VE=3.3% (95% CI, -22.3-23.6)) yet strongly associated with COVID-19 (odds ratio=2.95 (95% CI, 2.00-4.24)). Subsequently, we leveraged non-SARS-CoV-2 infections to detect bias in time-varying VE estimates from COVE's blinded and booster phases. Balanced incidence of non-SARS-CoV-2 infection between vaccinated and unvaccinated COVID-19-free risk sets suggested low selection bias in VE estimates of two-dose mRNA-1273 against COVID-19 during the blinded phase (VE=92.5% (95% CI, 88.8-94.9) 14 days post-dose-two, stable for 5 months). In COVE's booster phase, higher non-SARS-CoV-2 incidence was observed after the single booster (intensity ratio, IR=2.38 (95% CI, 1.75-3.25) 14 days post-boost), suggesting that booster VE estimates may underestimate the true VE against COVID-19. Our findings demonstrate the potential of off-target infections for unraveling complex biases in COVID-19 vaccine studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":7472,"journal":{"name":"American journal of epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12448673/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwaf176","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Negative control outcomes (NCOs) are useful tools for hidden bias detection, but empirical evidence validating NCOs for COVID-19 is lacking. To address this gap, we examined the blinded phase of the randomized, placebo-controlled Coronavirus Vaccine Efficacy (COVE; NCT04470427) trial of the mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccine. We confirmed that acute respiratory illness with a positive test for a non-SARS-CoV-2 respiratory pathogen on a multiplex PCR panel was a valid NCO for COVID-19, considering that it was unaffected by vaccination (vaccine efficacy, VE=3.3% (95% CI, -22.3-23.6)) yet strongly associated with COVID-19 (odds ratio=2.95 (95% CI, 2.00-4.24)). Subsequently, we leveraged non-SARS-CoV-2 infections to detect bias in time-varying VE estimates from COVE's blinded and booster phases. Balanced incidence of non-SARS-CoV-2 infection between vaccinated and unvaccinated COVID-19-free risk sets suggested low selection bias in VE estimates of two-dose mRNA-1273 against COVID-19 during the blinded phase (VE=92.5% (95% CI, 88.8-94.9) 14 days post-dose-two, stable for 5 months). In COVE's booster phase, higher non-SARS-CoV-2 incidence was observed after the single booster (intensity ratio, IR=2.38 (95% CI, 1.75-3.25) 14 days post-boost), suggesting that booster VE estimates may underestimate the true VE against COVID-19. Our findings demonstrate the potential of off-target infections for unraveling complex biases in COVID-19 vaccine studies.

验证和利用非sars - cov -2呼吸道感染作为阴性对照结果的3期COVID-19疫苗试验与延长观察随访。
阴性对照结果(NCOs)是检测隐藏偏差的有用工具,但缺乏验证NCOs与COVID-19相关的经验证据。为了解决这一空白,我们对mRNA-1273 COVID-19疫苗的随机、安慰剂对照冠状病毒疫苗疗效(COVE; NCT04470427)试验的盲法阶段进行了研究。我们证实,多重PCR检测非sars - cov -2呼吸道病原体呈阳性的急性呼吸道疾病是COVID-19的有效NCO,考虑到它不受疫苗接种的影响(疫苗有效性,VE=3.3% (95% CI, -22.3-23.6)),但与COVID-19密切相关(优势比=2.95 (95% CI, 2.00-4.24))。随后,我们利用非sars - cov -2感染来检测COVE盲法和加强期随时间变化的VE估计的偏差。非sars - cov -2感染在接种疫苗和未接种COVID-19的风险组之间的发生率平衡,表明在盲法期,两剂mRNA-1273抗COVID-19的VE估计的选择偏差较低(VE=92.5% (95% CI, 88.8-94.9),两剂后14天,稳定5个月)。在COVE增强期,单次增强后非sars - cov -2发生率较高(强度比,IR=2.38 (95% CI, 1.75-3.25),增强后14天),表明增强后的VE估计可能低估了对COVID-19的真实VE。我们的研究结果表明,脱靶感染有可能解开COVID-19疫苗研究中的复杂偏见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of epidemiology
American journal of epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
221
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Epidemiology is the oldest and one of the premier epidemiologic journals devoted to the publication of empirical research findings, opinion pieces, and methodological developments in the field of epidemiologic research. It is a peer-reviewed journal aimed at both fellow epidemiologists and those who use epidemiologic data, including public health workers and clinicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信