Effectiveness of sorafenib in combination with physical thermal ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Xiang Wen, Fuliang Qi, Hailong Qian, Rancen Tao, Jie Li, Liang Wang
{"title":"Effectiveness of sorafenib in combination with physical thermal ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis.","authors":"Xiang Wen, Fuliang Qi, Hailong Qian, Rancen Tao, Jie Li, Liang Wang","doi":"10.17219/acem/202323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the 6th most common cancer worldwide and claims roughly 700,000 lives each year; nearly 50% of global HCC fatalities occur in China.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To conduct a comprehensive meta-analysis identifying predictors of sorafenib efficacy in combination with thermal ablation for HCC treatment.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted up to October 2024, reviewing 720 identified studies. From these, 19 studies were selected that included a total of 3,341 participants with HCC at baseline. The meta-analysis examined the effects of sorafenib in combination with physical thermal ablation, using odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Analyses were performed using two-sided methods and either fixed-effect or random-effects models, depending on the level of heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The meta-analysis revealed that combining physical thermal ablation with sorafenib significantly improved outcomes in HCC patients: Overall survival (OS) was more than doubled (OR = 2.03; 95% CI: 1.55-2.67; p < 0.001), recurrence rates were significantly reduced (OR = 0.62; 95% CI: 0.39-0.98; p = 0.04), and overall treatment efficacy was markedly higher (OR = 2.53; 95% CI: 1.61-3.96; p < 0.001) compared with thermal ablation alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In individuals with HCC, physical thermal ablation and sorafenib had significantly higher OS, lower recurrence rates, and high overall efficacy compared to physical thermal ablation. To validate this discovery, more research is needed, and caution must be implemented when interacting with its values.</p>","PeriodicalId":7306,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17219/acem/202323","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the 6th most common cancer worldwide and claims roughly 700,000 lives each year; nearly 50% of global HCC fatalities occur in China.

Objectives: To conduct a comprehensive meta-analysis identifying predictors of sorafenib efficacy in combination with thermal ablation for HCC treatment.

Material and methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted up to October 2024, reviewing 720 identified studies. From these, 19 studies were selected that included a total of 3,341 participants with HCC at baseline. The meta-analysis examined the effects of sorafenib in combination with physical thermal ablation, using odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Analyses were performed using two-sided methods and either fixed-effect or random-effects models, depending on the level of heterogeneity.

Results: The meta-analysis revealed that combining physical thermal ablation with sorafenib significantly improved outcomes in HCC patients: Overall survival (OS) was more than doubled (OR = 2.03; 95% CI: 1.55-2.67; p < 0.001), recurrence rates were significantly reduced (OR = 0.62; 95% CI: 0.39-0.98; p = 0.04), and overall treatment efficacy was markedly higher (OR = 2.53; 95% CI: 1.61-3.96; p < 0.001) compared with thermal ablation alone.

Conclusion: In individuals with HCC, physical thermal ablation and sorafenib had significantly higher OS, lower recurrence rates, and high overall efficacy compared to physical thermal ablation. To validate this discovery, more research is needed, and caution must be implemented when interacting with its values.

索拉非尼联合物理热消融治疗肝癌的有效性:一项荟萃分析。
背景:肝细胞癌(HCC)是全球第六大常见癌症,每年夺去约70万人的生命;全球近50%的HCC死亡病例发生在中国。目的:进行一项综合荟萃分析,确定索拉非尼联合热消融治疗HCC疗效的预测因素。材料和方法:截至2024年10月,进行了全面的文献检索,回顾了720项已确定的研究。从中选择了19项研究,包括3341名基线时HCC患者。该荟萃分析使用比值比(ORs)和95%置信区间(95% ci)检验了索拉非尼联合物理热消融的效果。根据异质性水平,采用双侧方法和固定效应或随机效应模型进行分析。结果:荟萃分析显示,物理热消融联合索拉非尼可显著改善HCC患者的预后:与单独热消融相比,总生存期(OS)增加一倍以上(OR = 2.03; 95% CI: 1.55-2.67; p < 0.001),复发率显著降低(OR = 0.62; 95% CI: 0.39-0.98; p = 0.04),总治疗疗效显著提高(OR = 2.53; 95% CI: 1.61-3.96; p < 0.001)。结论:在HCC患者中,与物理热消融相比,物理热消融和索拉非尼具有明显更高的OS,更低的复发率和更高的总体疗效。为了验证这一发现,需要进行更多的研究,并且在与其值交互时必须谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine
Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
153
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine has been published by the Wroclaw Medical University since 1992. Establishing the medical journal was the idea of Prof. Bogumił Halawa, Chair of the Department of Cardiology, and was fully supported by the Rector of Wroclaw Medical University, Prof. Zbigniew Knapik. Prof. Halawa was also the first editor-in-chief, between 1992-1997. The journal, then entitled "Postępy Medycyny Klinicznej i Doświadczalnej", appeared quarterly. Prof. Leszek Paradowski was editor-in-chief from 1997-1999. In 1998 he initiated alterations in the profile and cover design of the journal which were accepted by the Editorial Board. The title was changed to Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine. Articles in English were welcomed. A number of outstanding representatives of medical science from Poland and abroad were invited to participate in the newly established International Editorial Staff. Prof. Antonina Harłozińska-Szmyrka was editor-in-chief in years 2000-2005, in years 2006-2007 once again prof. Leszek Paradowski and prof. Maria Podolak-Dawidziak was editor-in-chief in years 2008-2016. Since 2017 the editor-in chief is prof. Maciej Bagłaj. Since July 2005, original papers have been published only in English. Case reports are no longer accepted. The manuscripts are reviewed by two independent reviewers and a statistical reviewer, and English texts are proofread by a native speaker. The journal has been indexed in several databases: Scopus, Ulrich’sTM International Periodicals Directory, Index Copernicus and since 2007 in Thomson Reuters databases: Science Citation Index Expanded i Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition. In 2010 the journal obtained Impact Factor which is now 1.179 pts. Articles published in the journal are worth 15 points among Polish journals according to the Polish Committee for Scientific Research and 169.43 points according to the Index Copernicus. Since November 7, 2012, Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine has been indexed and included in National Library of Medicine’s MEDLINE database. English abstracts printed in the journal are included and searchable using PubMed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信