An Examination of Training Quality and Provider Outcomes Across Two Generations of Train-the-Trainer

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Catherine A. Callaway, Joshua M. Varghese, Emma R. Agnew, Laurel D. Sarfan, Allison G. Harvey
{"title":"An Examination of Training Quality and Provider Outcomes Across Two Generations of Train-the-Trainer","authors":"Catherine A. Callaway,&nbsp;Joshua M. Varghese,&nbsp;Emma R. Agnew,&nbsp;Laurel D. Sarfan,&nbsp;Allison G. Harvey","doi":"10.1007/s10488-025-01463-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Train-the-trainer (TTT) is a promising method for implementing and sustaining evidence-based psychological treatments (EBPTs) in routine practice. In TTT, external “expert” trainers train an initial provider cohort (i.e., Generation 1) and then train “local” trainers to train the next provider cohort (i.e., Generation 2). This study evaluated whether training quality and provider outcomes are maintained across two generations of TTT in a hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation trial. TTT was used to implement the Transdiagnostic Intervention for Sleep and Circadian Dysfunction (TranS-C) in community mental health centers (CMHCs) across California, United States. CMHCs were randomized to receive training in either Standard or Adapted TranS-C. Data from both conditions were combined to maximize power. Two expert trainers trained 115 providers (Generation 1), and 25 local trainers trained 42 providers (Generation 2). Trainings were coded for gold standard training elements (TranS-C content, training techniques) using the Gold Standard Training Checklist. Providers completed a post-training assessment which measured TranS-C knowledge, acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of TranS-C, and willingness and confidence to use TranS-C. Local trainers delivered more gold standard training techniques than expert trainers. No differences were found between generations on provider outcomes after correcting for multiple comparisons. Sensitivity analyses excluding outliers revealed that providers trained in Generation 2 rated TranS-C as more appropriate to their setting. The extent of gold standard elements delivered in trainings were not related to provider outcomes. These findings support the potential of TTT to sustain, and even improve, training quality and provider outcomes in a CMHC setting.</p><p>The parent study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04154631) on 11 April 2019, https//clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04154631. This study was preregistered on the Open Science Framework (osfregistrationsx7v38v1).</p>","PeriodicalId":7195,"journal":{"name":"Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research","volume":"52 5","pages":"966 - 982"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10488-025-01463-w.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10488-025-01463-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Train-the-trainer (TTT) is a promising method for implementing and sustaining evidence-based psychological treatments (EBPTs) in routine practice. In TTT, external “expert” trainers train an initial provider cohort (i.e., Generation 1) and then train “local” trainers to train the next provider cohort (i.e., Generation 2). This study evaluated whether training quality and provider outcomes are maintained across two generations of TTT in a hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation trial. TTT was used to implement the Transdiagnostic Intervention for Sleep and Circadian Dysfunction (TranS-C) in community mental health centers (CMHCs) across California, United States. CMHCs were randomized to receive training in either Standard or Adapted TranS-C. Data from both conditions were combined to maximize power. Two expert trainers trained 115 providers (Generation 1), and 25 local trainers trained 42 providers (Generation 2). Trainings were coded for gold standard training elements (TranS-C content, training techniques) using the Gold Standard Training Checklist. Providers completed a post-training assessment which measured TranS-C knowledge, acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of TranS-C, and willingness and confidence to use TranS-C. Local trainers delivered more gold standard training techniques than expert trainers. No differences were found between generations on provider outcomes after correcting for multiple comparisons. Sensitivity analyses excluding outliers revealed that providers trained in Generation 2 rated TranS-C as more appropriate to their setting. The extent of gold standard elements delivered in trainings were not related to provider outcomes. These findings support the potential of TTT to sustain, and even improve, training quality and provider outcomes in a CMHC setting.

The parent study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04154631) on 11 April 2019, https//clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04154631. This study was preregistered on the Open Science Framework (osfregistrationsx7v38v1).

对两代培训师培训质量和提供者成果的考察。
培训师(TTT)是一种很有前途的方法,在日常实践中实施和维持循证心理治疗(EBPTs)。在TTT中,外部“专家”培训师培训最初的提供者队列(即第一代),然后培训“本地”培训师培训下一个提供者队列(即第二代)。本研究在混合型2有效性-实施试验中评估了两代TTT的培训质量和提供者结果是否保持不变。TTT用于在美国加利福尼亚州的社区精神卫生中心(cmhc)实施睡眠和昼夜节律障碍的跨诊断干预(TranS-C)。CMHCs随机接受标准TranS-C或改编TranS-C培训。将两种情况下的数据结合起来以实现功率最大化。两名专家培训师培训了115名提供者(第一代),25名当地培训师培训了42名提供者(第二代)。使用金标准培训清单对培训内容(TranS-C内容、培训技术)进行编码。提供者完成培训后评估,测量TranS-C知识、可接受性、适当性和可行性,以及使用TranS-C的意愿和信心。本地培训师传授的黄金标准培训技巧多于专业培训师。在校正多重比较后,没有发现代际间提供者结果的差异。排除异常值的敏感性分析显示,接受过第二代培训的医疗服务提供者认为TranS-C更适合他们的环境。培训中提供的金标准要素的程度与提供者的结果无关。这些发现支持了TTT在CMHC环境中维持甚至改善培训质量和提供者结果的潜力。试验注册:本研究已于2019年4月11日在ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04154631)注册,https//clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04154631。本研究已在开放科学框架(osfregistrationsx7v38v1)上预注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: The aim of Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services is to improve mental health services through research. This journal primarily publishes peer-reviewed, original empirical research articles.  The journal also welcomes systematic reviews. Please contact the editor if you have suggestions for special issues or sections focusing on important contemporary issues.  The journal usually does not publish articles on drug or alcohol addiction unless it focuses on persons who are dually diagnosed. Manuscripts on children and adults are equally welcome. Topics for articles may include, but need not be limited to, effectiveness of services, measure development, economics of mental health services, managed mental health care, implementation of services, staffing, leadership, organizational relations and policy, and the like.  Please review previously published articles for fit with our journal before submitting your manuscript.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信