Cause-specific mortality after a diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ: Associations with screening and socio-economic status.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Renée S J M Schmitz, Alexandra W van den Belt-Dusebout, Maartje van Seijen, Ellen A J Verschuur, Frederieke H van Duijnhoven, Michael Schaapveld, Esther H Lips, Jelle Wesseling, Marjanka K Schmidt
{"title":"Cause-specific mortality after a diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ: Associations with screening and socio-economic status.","authors":"Renée S J M Schmitz, Alexandra W van den Belt-Dusebout, Maartje van Seijen, Ellen A J Verschuur, Frederieke H van Duijnhoven, Michael Schaapveld, Esther H Lips, Jelle Wesseling, Marjanka K Schmidt","doi":"10.1002/ijc.70112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The lower all-cause mortality in women with Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) compared with the general population has been hypothesized to be due to a \"healthy-user effect,\" but this has not been studied in large cohorts. In a population-based, retrospective cohort study comprising 18,942 women with primary DCIS between 1999 and 2015 in the Netherlands, the cumulative incidence of breast cancer death (BCD) was estimated using death by other cause as a competing risk. The cause-specific mortality risk of women with DCIS was compared with that of the Dutch female population. Multivariable competing risk regression was used to quantify the effects of the method of detection and socio-economic status (SES). With 289 BCDs, the 10-year cumulative incidence of BCD was 1.3% (95% CI, 1.1-1.5). Compared to the Dutch female population, women with DCIS had a 2.1-times higher risk of BCD, but a 7% lower risk of all-cause mortality. Women with screen-detected DCIS had lower risks of BCD compared to women with non-screen-detected DCIS (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR]:0.60, 95% CI 0.47-0.77), as did women with high SES versus low SES (sHR 0.54, 95% CI 0.30-0.97) in the first 4 years of follow-up, adjusted for age and year at diagnosis, and DCIS characteristics. In conclusion, overall mortality in women with DCIS is not higher compared to the Dutch female population, though death due to invasive breast cancer is increased. Within all women with DCIS, those with screen-detected DCIS or high SES had lower BCD and all-cause mortality, suggesting a healthy-user effect.</p>","PeriodicalId":180,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.70112","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The lower all-cause mortality in women with Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) compared with the general population has been hypothesized to be due to a "healthy-user effect," but this has not been studied in large cohorts. In a population-based, retrospective cohort study comprising 18,942 women with primary DCIS between 1999 and 2015 in the Netherlands, the cumulative incidence of breast cancer death (BCD) was estimated using death by other cause as a competing risk. The cause-specific mortality risk of women with DCIS was compared with that of the Dutch female population. Multivariable competing risk regression was used to quantify the effects of the method of detection and socio-economic status (SES). With 289 BCDs, the 10-year cumulative incidence of BCD was 1.3% (95% CI, 1.1-1.5). Compared to the Dutch female population, women with DCIS had a 2.1-times higher risk of BCD, but a 7% lower risk of all-cause mortality. Women with screen-detected DCIS had lower risks of BCD compared to women with non-screen-detected DCIS (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR]:0.60, 95% CI 0.47-0.77), as did women with high SES versus low SES (sHR 0.54, 95% CI 0.30-0.97) in the first 4 years of follow-up, adjusted for age and year at diagnosis, and DCIS characteristics. In conclusion, overall mortality in women with DCIS is not higher compared to the Dutch female population, though death due to invasive breast cancer is increased. Within all women with DCIS, those with screen-detected DCIS or high SES had lower BCD and all-cause mortality, suggesting a healthy-user effect.

导管原位癌诊断后的病因特异性死亡率:与筛查和社会经济地位的关系。
与一般人群相比,导管原位癌(DCIS)妇女的全因死亡率较低的假设是由于“健康使用者效应”,但尚未在大型队列中进行研究。在一项以人群为基础的回顾性队列研究中,荷兰1999年至2015年期间18,942名原发性DCIS妇女,使用其他原因死亡作为竞争风险来估计乳腺癌死亡(BCD)的累积发生率。将患有DCIS的妇女与荷兰女性人口的死因特异性死亡风险进行了比较。使用多变量竞争风险回归来量化检测方法和社会经济地位(SES)的影响。289例BCD, 10年累计BCD发病率为1.3% (95% CI, 1.1-1.5)。与荷兰女性相比,患有DCIS的女性患BCD的风险高2.1倍,但全因死亡率低7%。筛查检测到DCIS的女性与未筛查检测到DCIS的女性相比,BCD的风险更低(亚分布风险比[sHR]:0.60, 95% CI 0.47-0.77),高SES与低SES的女性(sHR 0.54, 95% CI 0.30-0.97)在前4年的随访中,根据诊断时的年龄和年份以及DCIS特征进行调整。总之,DCIS妇女的总死亡率与荷兰女性人口相比并不高,但浸润性乳腺癌的死亡率有所增加。在所有患有DCIS的女性中,筛检出DCIS或高SES的女性BCD和全因死亡率较低,表明存在健康使用者效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
3.10%
发文量
460
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Cancer (IJC) is the official journal of the Union for International Cancer Control—UICC; it appears twice a month. IJC invites submission of manuscripts under a broad scope of topics relevant to experimental and clinical cancer research and publishes original Research Articles and Short Reports under the following categories: -Cancer Epidemiology- Cancer Genetics and Epigenetics- Infectious Causes of Cancer- Innovative Tools and Methods- Molecular Cancer Biology- Tumor Immunology and Microenvironment- Tumor Markers and Signatures- Cancer Therapy and Prevention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信