Limited but localized: geochemical and biodiversity impacts of shale gas extraction on soil ecosystems

IF 3.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Shangbo Zhou, Yiyao Li, Xicheng Jin, Shuchan Peng, Changqian Miu, Daijun Zhang and Peili Lu
{"title":"Limited but localized: geochemical and biodiversity impacts of shale gas extraction on soil ecosystems","authors":"Shangbo Zhou, Yiyao Li, Xicheng Jin, Shuchan Peng, Changqian Miu, Daijun Zhang and Peili Lu","doi":"10.1039/D5EM00356C","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >The rapid global expansion of shale gas extraction has intensified scrutiny of its environmental impact, yet research on terrestrial ecosystems remains limited compared to aquatic systems. To address this gap, we investigated the Fuling shale gas field in China's Sichuan Basin—a region of intensive hydraulic fracturing activity—to evaluate effects on soil geochemistry and fauna. We quantified hydraulic fracturing-associated tracers (<em>i.e.</em>, electrical conductivity (EC), chloride (Cl<small><sup>−</sup></small>), strontium (Sr), and barium (Ba)) across three distance gradients (10 m, 50 m, and 100 m) from extraction well pads. While EC, Cl<small><sup>−</sup></small>, Sr, and Ba concentrations were elevated at certain sampling sites near the extraction well pads, statistical analyses revealed no significant differences in the concentrations of these tracers across varying distance gradients. To assess ecological impacts, we integrated traditional morphological taxonomy with environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding, enabling high-resolution characterization of soil fauna communities. Results indicated no significant alterations in community structure attributable to shale gas activities. A multiparameter index (MPI) synthesizing physicochemical and biological data further confirmed no measurable degradation of soil health. These findings suggest that current extraction practices in the Sichuan Basin have not yet caused serious soil contamination or ecological disruption within the studied spatial scope. However, as regional hydraulic fracturing intensifies, long-term monitoring of cumulative pressures and ecosystem resilience thresholds will be essential to mitigate latent risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":74,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts","volume":" 9","pages":" 2931-2940"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/em/d5em00356c","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rapid global expansion of shale gas extraction has intensified scrutiny of its environmental impact, yet research on terrestrial ecosystems remains limited compared to aquatic systems. To address this gap, we investigated the Fuling shale gas field in China's Sichuan Basin—a region of intensive hydraulic fracturing activity—to evaluate effects on soil geochemistry and fauna. We quantified hydraulic fracturing-associated tracers (i.e., electrical conductivity (EC), chloride (Cl), strontium (Sr), and barium (Ba)) across three distance gradients (10 m, 50 m, and 100 m) from extraction well pads. While EC, Cl, Sr, and Ba concentrations were elevated at certain sampling sites near the extraction well pads, statistical analyses revealed no significant differences in the concentrations of these tracers across varying distance gradients. To assess ecological impacts, we integrated traditional morphological taxonomy with environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding, enabling high-resolution characterization of soil fauna communities. Results indicated no significant alterations in community structure attributable to shale gas activities. A multiparameter index (MPI) synthesizing physicochemical and biological data further confirmed no measurable degradation of soil health. These findings suggest that current extraction practices in the Sichuan Basin have not yet caused serious soil contamination or ecological disruption within the studied spatial scope. However, as regional hydraulic fracturing intensifies, long-term monitoring of cumulative pressures and ecosystem resilience thresholds will be essential to mitigate latent risks.

Abstract Image

有限但局部:页岩气开采对土壤生态系统的地球化学和生物多样性影响。
页岩气开采在全球的迅速扩张加剧了对其环境影响的审视,但与水生系统相比,对陆地生态系统的研究仍然有限。为了解决这一差距,我们对中国四川盆地涪陵页岩气田进行了调查,以评估其对土壤地球化学和动物的影响。涪陵页岩气田是水力压裂活动密集的地区。我们对水力压裂相关的示踪剂(即电导率(EC)、氯化物(Cl-)、锶(Sr)和钡(Ba))在距离提取井台10米、50米和100米的三个距离梯度上进行了量化。虽然在提取井台附近的某些采样点,EC、Cl-、Sr和Ba的浓度升高,但统计分析显示,这些示踪剂的浓度在不同距离梯度上没有显著差异。为了评估生态影响,我们将传统形态分类学与环境DNA (eDNA)元条形码相结合,实现了土壤动物群落的高分辨率表征。结果表明,页岩气活动对群落结构没有显著影响。综合理化和生物学数据的多参数指数(MPI)进一步证实了土壤健康没有可测量的退化。这些结果表明,在研究的空间范围内,四川盆地目前的开采活动尚未造成严重的土壤污染或生态破坏。然而,随着区域水力压裂的加剧,长期监测累积压力和生态系统恢复阈值对于减轻潜在风险至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
3.60%
发文量
202
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts publishes high quality papers in all areas of the environmental chemical sciences, including chemistry of the air, water, soil and sediment. We welcome studies on the environmental fate and effects of anthropogenic and naturally occurring contaminants, both chemical and microbiological, as well as related natural element cycling processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信