Impact of Sample Preparation Strategies on the Quantitative Accuracy of Low-Abundance Serum Proteins in Shotgun Proteomics

IF 3.6 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Drosos Katsavelis*, Marieke G. C. van der Hart, Justina C. Wolters, Hjalmar P. Permentier, Peter Horvatovich and Thomas I.F.H. Cremers, 
{"title":"Impact of Sample Preparation Strategies on the Quantitative Accuracy of Low-Abundance Serum Proteins in Shotgun Proteomics","authors":"Drosos Katsavelis*,&nbsp;Marieke G. C. van der Hart,&nbsp;Justina C. Wolters,&nbsp;Hjalmar P. Permentier,&nbsp;Peter Horvatovich and Thomas I.F.H. Cremers,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.jproteome.5c00572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Serum proteomics plays a crucial role in biomarker discovery and disease research, yet the selection of an optimal sample preparation method remains challenging. Evaluating the accuracy of protein quantitation is of major importance and a vital part of a benchmarking study in proteomics, since clinical studies are based on the differential expression of certain proteins that can be used as biomarkers or be indicative of a pathological state. In this study, we performed a direct comparison of 6 widely used serum proteomic sample preparation workflows: In-gel digestion (IGD), Single-Pot Solid-Phase-enhanced Sample Preparation (SP3), Top 14 Abundant Protein Depletion (Top 14), Isopropanol/Trichloroacetic Acid (IPA/TCA) precipitation, PreOmics ENRICH-iST (PreOmics), and Seer Proteograph XT (Seer). Seer and PreOmics demonstrated superior quantitative accuracy, especially for proteins with low abundance in serum, while the Seer enrichment approach provided the highest number of protein identifications (&gt;2000) as measured by an Orbitrap Exploris 480. All methods had median CVs close to or below 20%. This comparative analysis provides a comprehensive resource for selecting the most appropriate serum sample preparation strategy based on specific experimental needs, facilitating human serum proteomic profiling for biomedical research.</p>","PeriodicalId":48,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Proteome Research","volume":"24 9","pages":"4792–4803"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.jproteome.5c00572","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Proteome Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jproteome.5c00572","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Serum proteomics plays a crucial role in biomarker discovery and disease research, yet the selection of an optimal sample preparation method remains challenging. Evaluating the accuracy of protein quantitation is of major importance and a vital part of a benchmarking study in proteomics, since clinical studies are based on the differential expression of certain proteins that can be used as biomarkers or be indicative of a pathological state. In this study, we performed a direct comparison of 6 widely used serum proteomic sample preparation workflows: In-gel digestion (IGD), Single-Pot Solid-Phase-enhanced Sample Preparation (SP3), Top 14 Abundant Protein Depletion (Top 14), Isopropanol/Trichloroacetic Acid (IPA/TCA) precipitation, PreOmics ENRICH-iST (PreOmics), and Seer Proteograph XT (Seer). Seer and PreOmics demonstrated superior quantitative accuracy, especially for proteins with low abundance in serum, while the Seer enrichment approach provided the highest number of protein identifications (>2000) as measured by an Orbitrap Exploris 480. All methods had median CVs close to or below 20%. This comparative analysis provides a comprehensive resource for selecting the most appropriate serum sample preparation strategy based on specific experimental needs, facilitating human serum proteomic profiling for biomedical research.

样品制备策略对Shotgun蛋白质组学低丰度血清蛋白定量准确性的影响。
血清蛋白质组学在生物标志物发现和疾病研究中发挥着至关重要的作用,但选择最佳的样品制备方法仍然具有挑战性。评估蛋白质定量的准确性非常重要,也是蛋白质组学基准研究的重要组成部分,因为临床研究是基于某些蛋白质的差异表达,这些蛋白质可以用作生物标志物或指示病理状态。在这项研究中,我们对6种广泛使用的血清蛋白质组学样品制备工作流程进行了直接比较:凝胶内消化(IGD)、单锅固相增强样品制备(SP3)、Top 14 Abundant Protein Depletion (Top 14)、异丙醇/三氯乙酸(IPA/TCA)沉淀、PreOmics ENRICH-iST (PreOmics)和Seer Proteograph XT (Seer)。Seer和PreOmics表现出卓越的定量准确性,特别是对于血清中丰度较低的蛋白质,而Seer富集方法提供了最高数量的蛋白质鉴定(bbb2000),由Orbitrap Exploris 480测量。所有方法的中位数cv都接近或低于20%。这种比较分析为根据特定的实验需要选择最合适的血清样品制备策略提供了综合资源,促进了生物医学研究的人类血清蛋白质组学分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Proteome Research
Journal of Proteome Research 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
4.50%
发文量
251
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Proteome Research publishes content encompassing all aspects of global protein analysis and function, including the dynamic aspects of genomics, spatio-temporal proteomics, metabonomics and metabolomics, clinical and agricultural proteomics, as well as advances in methodology including bioinformatics. The theme and emphasis is on a multidisciplinary approach to the life sciences through the synergy between the different types of "omics".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信