Awareness and Attitudes Toward Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw Among Physicians: A Cross-Sectional Study

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Kadriye Ayça Dere, Ayşe Güllü
{"title":"Awareness and Attitudes Toward Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw Among Physicians: A Cross-Sectional Study","authors":"Kadriye Ayça Dere,&nbsp;Ayşe Güllü","doi":"10.1155/ijcp/1684494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Background:</b> The aim of this study was to evaluate the knowledge and attitudes of medical physicians who prescribe antiresorptive and antiangiogenic drugs toward medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ), a devastating complication.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> This cross-sectional study included physicians in the fields of internal medicine, orthopedics and traumatology, rheumatology, physical medicine and rehabilitation, oncology, hematology, and urology working in university hospitals, training and research hospitals, and private health institutions. Participating physicians were asked to answer a survey consisting of 25 questions to determine their knowledge, attitudes, and awareness about MRONJ.</p><p><b>Results:</b> Of the physicians participating in the study, 45% were academicians, 30.9% were specialists, and 24.2% were assistant physicians. 30.3% of the participate had never heard of the concept of MRONJ. The specialties most aware of the concept of MRONJ were internal medicine (21.74%), physical medicine and rehabilitation (18.26%), and orthopedics and traumatology (17.39%), respectively. In our study, it was determined that 38.78% of the participants did not receive information on this subject through lectures/presentations/seminars, etc., and 10.8% reported that they were not informed about the side effects of drugs that can cause MRONJ. 37% of the physicians never consulted their patients with a dentist before starting treatment with drugs that can cause MRONJ.</p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> The study results showed that physicians who prescribe drugs that can cause MRONJ have low awareness of preventing MRONJ and that their knowledge and sensitivity on this issue should be increased.</p>","PeriodicalId":13782,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ijcp/1684494","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ijcp/1684494","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the knowledge and attitudes of medical physicians who prescribe antiresorptive and antiangiogenic drugs toward medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ), a devastating complication.

Methods: This cross-sectional study included physicians in the fields of internal medicine, orthopedics and traumatology, rheumatology, physical medicine and rehabilitation, oncology, hematology, and urology working in university hospitals, training and research hospitals, and private health institutions. Participating physicians were asked to answer a survey consisting of 25 questions to determine their knowledge, attitudes, and awareness about MRONJ.

Results: Of the physicians participating in the study, 45% were academicians, 30.9% were specialists, and 24.2% were assistant physicians. 30.3% of the participate had never heard of the concept of MRONJ. The specialties most aware of the concept of MRONJ were internal medicine (21.74%), physical medicine and rehabilitation (18.26%), and orthopedics and traumatology (17.39%), respectively. In our study, it was determined that 38.78% of the participants did not receive information on this subject through lectures/presentations/seminars, etc., and 10.8% reported that they were not informed about the side effects of drugs that can cause MRONJ. 37% of the physicians never consulted their patients with a dentist before starting treatment with drugs that can cause MRONJ.

Conclusions: The study results showed that physicians who prescribe drugs that can cause MRONJ have low awareness of preventing MRONJ and that their knowledge and sensitivity on this issue should be increased.

Abstract Image

医师对颌骨药物相关性骨坏死的认识和态度:一项横断面研究
背景:本研究的目的是评估开抗吸收和抗血管生成药物的医生对药物相关性颌骨骨坏死(MRONJ)的知识和态度,这是一种毁灭性的并发症。方法:这项横断面研究包括在大学医院、培训和研究医院以及私立医疗机构工作的内科、骨科和创伤学、风湿病学、物理医学和康复学、肿瘤学、血液学和泌尿学等领域的医生。参与调查的医生被要求回答一项由25个问题组成的调查,以确定他们对MRONJ的知识、态度和意识。结果:参与研究的医师中,专科医师占45%,专科医师占30.9%,助理医师占24.2%。30.3%的参与者从未听说过MRONJ的概念。最了解MRONJ概念的专业分别是内科(21.74%)、物理医学与康复(18.26%)、骨科与创伤(17.39%)。在我们的研究中,我们确定38.78%的参与者没有通过讲座/演示/研讨会等方式获得关于这一主题的信息,10.8%的参与者报告他们没有被告知可能导致MRONJ的药物的副作用。37%的医生在开始使用可能导致MRONJ的药物治疗之前从未咨询过他们的病人的牙医。结论:本研究结果表明,开具可引起MRONJ的药物的医生对预防MRONJ的意识较低,应提高其对此问题的认识和敏感性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
274
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: IJCP is a general medical journal. IJCP gives special priority to work that has international appeal. IJCP publishes: Editorials. IJCP Editorials are commissioned. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] Perspectives. Most IJCP Perspectives are commissioned. Example. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] Study design and interpretation. Example. [Always peer reviewed] Original data from clinical investigations. In particular: Primary research papers from RCTs, observational studies, epidemiological studies; pre-specified sub-analyses; pooled analyses. [Always peer reviewed] Meta-analyses. [Always peer reviewed] Systematic reviews. From October 2009, special priority will be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed] Non-systematic/narrative reviews. From October 2009, reviews that are not systematic will be considered only if they include a discrete Methods section that must explicitly describe the authors'' approach. Special priority will, however, be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed] ''How to…'' papers. Example. [Always peer reviewed] Consensus statements. [Always peer reviewed] Short reports. [Always peer reviewed] Letters. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] International scope IJCP publishes work from investigators globally. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the UK. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the USA or Canada. Around 45% of IJCP articles list an author from a European country that is not the UK. Around 15% of articles published in IJCP list an author from a country in the Asia-Pacific region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信