Echocardiographic predictors of double disc-self-centering device embolization after transcatheter closure of ostium secundum atrial septal defects

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Grégoire Albenque , Estíbaliz Valdeolmillos , Marine Cachanado , Jerome Petit , clement Batteux , Sebastien Hascoet
{"title":"Echocardiographic predictors of double disc-self-centering device embolization after transcatheter closure of ostium secundum atrial septal defects","authors":"Grégoire Albenque ,&nbsp;Estíbaliz Valdeolmillos ,&nbsp;Marine Cachanado ,&nbsp;Jerome Petit ,&nbsp;clement Batteux ,&nbsp;Sebastien Hascoet","doi":"10.1016/j.acvd.2025.06.048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Transcatheter closure of ostium secundum atrial septal defect (osASD) has been the first-line treatment since the 2000s, with the Amplatzer Septal Occluder (ASO) being the most commonly used device. Device embolization is the most frequent major complication. This study aims to identify key echocardiographic predictors of device embolization in a large patient cohort.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>This prospective, single-center cohort study included patients who underwent transcatheter osASD closure with ASO between 1998 and 2021 at Marie Lannelongue Hospital. Echocardiographic assessments included osASD size and rim evaluation. Rim deficiency was defined as &lt;<!--> <!-->5<!--> <!-->mm. The osASD size-to-body surface area (BSA) ratio was calculated. Logistic regression models identified factors associated with embolization.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 1901 patients with complete echocardiographic data, 19 (1%) experienced device embolization within 48<!--> <!-->hours. Eleven occurred in adults and eight in patients under 18years old. Ten devices embolized within the right heart cavities or pulmonary trunk while nine migrated into the left cavities or aorta. Thirteen devices were successfully retrieved by catheterisation and in four cases osASD closure was successfully performed during a second attempt using a larger prosthesis. Embolization was significantly associated with larger osASD size (22<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->9<!--> <!-->mm <em>vs.</em> 18<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->7<!--> <!-->mm, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.031) and an osASD size/BSA ratio<!--> <!-->≥<!--> <!-->20<!--> <!-->mm/m<sup>2</sup> (OR 5.27 [1.95–14.22], <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.001). IVC, antero-inferior, and postero-inferior rim deficiencies were also significant predictors (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001, <em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001, and <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.023, respectively). The absence of balloon sizing increased embolization risk (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.002). In multivariate analysis, IVC rim deficiency (OR 15.38 [3.58–66.08], <em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001) and an osASD size/BSA ratio<!--> <!-->≥<!--> <!-->20<!--> <!-->mm/m<sup>2</sup> (OR 4.27 [1.46–12.53], <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.008) remained independent predictors.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Transcatheter osASD closure is highly successful with low major complication rates. However, device embolization is associated with IVC rim deficiency and an osASD size/BSA ratio<!--> <!-->≥<!--> <!-->20<!--> <!-->mm/m<sup>2</sup>.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55472,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases","volume":"118 8","pages":"Pages S272-S273"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875213625003754","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Transcatheter closure of ostium secundum atrial septal defect (osASD) has been the first-line treatment since the 2000s, with the Amplatzer Septal Occluder (ASO) being the most commonly used device. Device embolization is the most frequent major complication. This study aims to identify key echocardiographic predictors of device embolization in a large patient cohort.

Method

This prospective, single-center cohort study included patients who underwent transcatheter osASD closure with ASO between 1998 and 2021 at Marie Lannelongue Hospital. Echocardiographic assessments included osASD size and rim evaluation. Rim deficiency was defined as < 5 mm. The osASD size-to-body surface area (BSA) ratio was calculated. Logistic regression models identified factors associated with embolization.

Results

Among 1901 patients with complete echocardiographic data, 19 (1%) experienced device embolization within 48 hours. Eleven occurred in adults and eight in patients under 18years old. Ten devices embolized within the right heart cavities or pulmonary trunk while nine migrated into the left cavities or aorta. Thirteen devices were successfully retrieved by catheterisation and in four cases osASD closure was successfully performed during a second attempt using a larger prosthesis. Embolization was significantly associated with larger osASD size (22 ± 9 mm vs. 18 ± 7 mm, p = 0.031) and an osASD size/BSA ratio  20 mm/m2 (OR 5.27 [1.95–14.22], p = 0.001). IVC, antero-inferior, and postero-inferior rim deficiencies were also significant predictors (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p = 0.023, respectively). The absence of balloon sizing increased embolization risk (p = 0.002). In multivariate analysis, IVC rim deficiency (OR 15.38 [3.58–66.08], p < 0.001) and an osASD size/BSA ratio  20 mm/m2 (OR 4.27 [1.46–12.53], p = 0.008) remained independent predictors.

Conclusion

Transcatheter osASD closure is highly successful with low major complication rates. However, device embolization is associated with IVC rim deficiency and an osASD size/BSA ratio  20 mm/m2.
经导管封闭第二心房缺损后双盘自定心装置栓塞的超声心动图预测因素
自2000年代以来,经导管关闭第二口房间隔缺损(osASD)已成为一线治疗方法,其中Amplatzer室间隔闭塞器(ASO)是最常用的设备。器械栓塞是最常见的主要并发症。本研究旨在确定大型患者队列中器械栓塞的关键超声心动图预测因素。该前瞻性单中心队列研究纳入了1998年至2021年间在Marie Lannelongue医院接受ASO经导管osASD关闭术的患者。超声心动图评估包括osASD大小和边缘评估。边缘缺陷定义为<; 5mm。计算osASD的尺寸与体表面积(BSA)比。Logistic回归模型确定了与栓塞相关的因素。结果1901例超声心动图资料完整的患者中,19例(1%)在48小时内进行了器械栓塞。11例发生在成人中,8例发生在18岁以下的患者中。10个装置栓塞在右心腔或肺动脉干内,9个装置迁移到左心腔或主动脉内。13个装置通过导管成功取出,4个病例在第二次尝试使用更大的假体时成功完成osASD关闭。栓塞与较大的osASD尺寸(22±9 mm比18±7 mm, p = 0.031)和osASD尺寸/BSA比值≥20 mm/m2 (OR 5.27 [1.95-14.22], p = 0.001)显著相关。IVC、前下缘缺陷和后下缘缺陷也是显著的预测因素(p < 0.001、p <; 0.001和p = 0.023)。没有球囊尺寸增加栓塞风险(p = 0.002)。在多变量分析中,IVC边缘缺陷(OR为15.38 [3.58-66.08],p < 0.001)和osASD大小/BSA比值≥20 mm/m2 (OR为4.27 [1.46-12.53],p = 0.008)仍然是独立的预测因子。结论经导管osASD闭合成功率高,主要并发症发生率低。然而,器械栓塞与下腔静脉边缘缺陷和osASD大小/BSA比值≥20mm /m2相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases
Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
87
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes original peer-reviewed clinical and research articles, epidemiological studies, new methodological clinical approaches, review articles and editorials. Topics covered include coronary artery and valve diseases, interventional and pediatric cardiology, cardiovascular surgery, cardiomyopathy and heart failure, arrhythmias and stimulation, cardiovascular imaging, vascular medicine and hypertension, epidemiology and risk factors, and large multicenter studies. Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases also publishes abstracts of papers presented at the annual sessions of the Journées Européennes de la Société Française de Cardiologie and the guidelines edited by the French Society of Cardiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信