Single-leg bending (SLB) analysis of a structural adhesive as a function of the adhesive thickness

A.F.L. Macedo , R.D.S.G. Campilho , A.L. Faria , M. Belhouari , K. Madani
{"title":"Single-leg bending (SLB) analysis of a structural adhesive as a function of the adhesive thickness","authors":"A.F.L. Macedo ,&nbsp;R.D.S.G. Campilho ,&nbsp;A.L. Faria ,&nbsp;M. Belhouari ,&nbsp;K. Madani","doi":"10.1016/j.prostr.2025.08.074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The mixed-mode static fracture analysis of bonded joints using cohesive zone models (CZM) requires accurate predictions of adhesive strength and fracture toughness. Tensile and shear fracture toughness (<em>G</em><sub>IC</sub> and <em>G</em><sub>IIC</sub>), along with their mixed-mode behaviors, significantly vary with the adhesive thickness (<em>t</em><sub>A</sub>). This work focuses on the numerical analysis of how <em>t</em><sub>A</sub> influences the mixed-mode fracture process in adhesive joints. Experimental data from single-leg bending (SLB) tests is used, involving composite adherends and a ductile adhesive, with <em>t</em><sub>A</sub> ranging from 0.1 to 2.0 mm. The study includes a comparison between experimental and numerical load-displacement (<em>P</em>-<em>δ</em>) curves for validation purposes, followed by the estimation of CZM laws and validation of the fracture envelope across all <em>t</em><sub>A</sub>. The findings enabled a comprehensive numerical evaluation of the <em>t</em><sub>A</sub> effect on fracture behavior in adhesive joints, leading to the proposal of a numerical methodology to analyze mixed-mode bonded joints.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20518,"journal":{"name":"Procedia Structural Integrity","volume":"72 ","pages":"Pages 61-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Procedia Structural Integrity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452321625004202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The mixed-mode static fracture analysis of bonded joints using cohesive zone models (CZM) requires accurate predictions of adhesive strength and fracture toughness. Tensile and shear fracture toughness (GIC and GIIC), along with their mixed-mode behaviors, significantly vary with the adhesive thickness (tA). This work focuses on the numerical analysis of how tA influences the mixed-mode fracture process in adhesive joints. Experimental data from single-leg bending (SLB) tests is used, involving composite adherends and a ductile adhesive, with tA ranging from 0.1 to 2.0 mm. The study includes a comparison between experimental and numerical load-displacement (P-δ) curves for validation purposes, followed by the estimation of CZM laws and validation of the fracture envelope across all tA. The findings enabled a comprehensive numerical evaluation of the tA effect on fracture behavior in adhesive joints, leading to the proposal of a numerical methodology to analyze mixed-mode bonded joints.
一种结构胶粘剂的单腿弯曲(SLB)随胶粘剂厚度的函数分析
利用黏合区模型(CZM)进行粘接接头的混合模式静态断裂分析,需要准确预测粘接强度和断裂韧性。拉伸和剪切断裂韧性(GIC和GIIC)及其混合模式行为随胶粘剂厚度(tA)显著变化。本文着重对tA对粘接接头混合模式断裂过程的影响进行了数值分析。使用单腿弯曲(SLB)试验的实验数据,包括复合粘合剂和韧性粘合剂,tA范围为0.1至2.0 mm。该研究包括比较实验和数值载荷-位移(P-δ)曲线以进行验证,然后估计CZM规律并验证所有tA的断裂包络。研究结果可以对tA对粘结接头断裂行为的影响进行全面的数值评估,从而提出了一种分析混合模式粘结接头的数值方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信