Modeling the carbon footprint in the life cycle of PET and glass packaging for beverages

IF 11.2 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
M. Medrek, L. Wiechetek, J. Banas, Z. Pastuszak
{"title":"Modeling the carbon footprint in the life cycle of PET and glass packaging for beverages","authors":"M. Medrek,&nbsp;L. Wiechetek,&nbsp;J. Banas,&nbsp;Z. Pastuszak","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study presents a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) comparing the carbon footprint (CF) of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and glass beverage packaging. The analysis focuses on disposable glass, returnable glass, and PET bottles, using one packaging cycle as the functional unit to ensure comparability across systems with varying reuse and recycling characteristics. Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) was applied to simulate process variability using stochastic real-world parameters collected from beverage producers and distributors in Poland. Environmental impacts were assessed across the full life cycle, including production, distribution, and end-of-life phases.</div><div>A unified recovery factor was introduced to integrate reuse (for returnable glass), material recycling (all packaging), and energy recovery (for PET), enabling consistent simulation of emission reductions. Results show a strong inverse correlation between CF and recovery rates. Returnable glass bottles offer the greatest potential for CF reduction, up to five times under high return rates, while PET benefits from low material weight and moderate recovery. Disposable glass exhibits the highest CF due to the energy intensity of virgin and cullet-based production.</div><div>The findings highlight the importance of improving return and recycling systems to reduce emissions. The model also allows extrapolation to EU-level scenarios by applying country-specific recovery rates. This research provides relevant guidance for manufacturers and policymakers aiming to reduce packaging-related impacts in line with circular economy goals and EU waste directives. The integration of BPMN with LCA offers a novel, flexible simulation framework for evaluating packaging strategies and optimizing recovery performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"117 ","pages":"Article 108140"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925525003373","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) comparing the carbon footprint (CF) of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and glass beverage packaging. The analysis focuses on disposable glass, returnable glass, and PET bottles, using one packaging cycle as the functional unit to ensure comparability across systems with varying reuse and recycling characteristics. Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) was applied to simulate process variability using stochastic real-world parameters collected from beverage producers and distributors in Poland. Environmental impacts were assessed across the full life cycle, including production, distribution, and end-of-life phases.
A unified recovery factor was introduced to integrate reuse (for returnable glass), material recycling (all packaging), and energy recovery (for PET), enabling consistent simulation of emission reductions. Results show a strong inverse correlation between CF and recovery rates. Returnable glass bottles offer the greatest potential for CF reduction, up to five times under high return rates, while PET benefits from low material weight and moderate recovery. Disposable glass exhibits the highest CF due to the energy intensity of virgin and cullet-based production.
The findings highlight the importance of improving return and recycling systems to reduce emissions. The model also allows extrapolation to EU-level scenarios by applying country-specific recovery rates. This research provides relevant guidance for manufacturers and policymakers aiming to reduce packaging-related impacts in line with circular economy goals and EU waste directives. The integration of BPMN with LCA offers a novel, flexible simulation framework for evaluating packaging strategies and optimizing recovery performance.
模拟饮料用PET和玻璃包装生命周期中的碳足迹
本研究提出了一个生命周期评估(LCA)比较碳足迹(CF)的聚对苯二甲酸乙二醇酯(PET)和玻璃饮料包装。分析的重点是一次性玻璃、可回收玻璃和PET瓶,使用一个包装循环作为功能单元,以确保具有不同再利用和回收特性的系统之间的可比性。业务流程模型和符号(BPMN)应用于模拟过程可变性,使用从波兰饮料生产商和分销商收集的随机现实世界参数。环境影响在整个生命周期进行评估,包括生产、分销和生命周期结束阶段。一个统一的回收系数被引入,以整合再利用(可回收玻璃)、材料回收(所有包装)和能源回收(PET),从而实现一致的减排模拟。结果显示,CF与恢复率之间存在很强的负相关关系。可回收的玻璃瓶提供了最大的潜力,减少CF,高达五倍在高回报率下,而PET受益于低材料重量和适度的回收。由于原始玻璃和基于cullet的生产的能源强度,一次性玻璃显示出最高的CF。研究结果强调了改善回收和再循环系统以减少排放的重要性。该模型还允许通过应用各国具体的回收率来推断欧盟层面的情景。本研究为制造商和决策者提供了相关指导,旨在根据循环经济目标和欧盟废物指令减少包装相关的影响。BPMN与LCA的集成为评估包装策略和优化回收性能提供了一个新颖、灵活的模拟框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
10.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信