Assessing the landslide failure surface depth and volume: A new spline interpolation method

IF 8.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Jaspreet Singh, Sergio A. Sepúlveda
{"title":"Assessing the landslide failure surface depth and volume: A new spline interpolation method","authors":"Jaspreet Singh,&nbsp;Sergio A. Sepúlveda","doi":"10.1016/j.enggeo.2025.108319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Landslides pose significant risk to the communities and infrastructure, particularly in mountainous regions. Accurate estimation of landslide slip surface depth/geometry and volume of displaced material is crucial for hazard assessment, borehole planning and mitigation strategy. This study presents a novel, cost-effective method based on spline interpolation to estimate the depth of slip surface using Digital Elevation Model (DEM) data, especially in areas with limited field data. The method relies on exposed boundary scarps, making it particularly useful for failed slopes with debris cover or well-developed slow-moving landslides where the slip surface is underneath the sliding material. The approach is validated through two case studies in Western Canada, the Hope Slide and the Downie Slide. The results demonstrate that the interpolated slip surface geometry, provided depth estimates and volume distributions that align closely with existing data, with a maximum volume of about 61 million m<sup>3</sup> for the Hope Slide and 0.9 billion m<sup>3</sup> for the Downie Slide. As the method is iterative, the stopping criteria can be decided on meeting a certain slope angle, depth or volume depending on the requirements. Further, the algorithm is flexible to include any additional data related to the slip surface in form of 3D exposure planes or 1D borehole depths. This was tested on the case studies by providing additional data and showing improved results on estimating the final slip surface geometry. Beyond landslides analysis the method can be applied for topographic corrections and removing deposited material from other surface processes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11567,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Geology","volume":"357 ","pages":"Article 108319"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Geology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013795225004156","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Landslides pose significant risk to the communities and infrastructure, particularly in mountainous regions. Accurate estimation of landslide slip surface depth/geometry and volume of displaced material is crucial for hazard assessment, borehole planning and mitigation strategy. This study presents a novel, cost-effective method based on spline interpolation to estimate the depth of slip surface using Digital Elevation Model (DEM) data, especially in areas with limited field data. The method relies on exposed boundary scarps, making it particularly useful for failed slopes with debris cover or well-developed slow-moving landslides where the slip surface is underneath the sliding material. The approach is validated through two case studies in Western Canada, the Hope Slide and the Downie Slide. The results demonstrate that the interpolated slip surface geometry, provided depth estimates and volume distributions that align closely with existing data, with a maximum volume of about 61 million m3 for the Hope Slide and 0.9 billion m3 for the Downie Slide. As the method is iterative, the stopping criteria can be decided on meeting a certain slope angle, depth or volume depending on the requirements. Further, the algorithm is flexible to include any additional data related to the slip surface in form of 3D exposure planes or 1D borehole depths. This was tested on the case studies by providing additional data and showing improved results on estimating the final slip surface geometry. Beyond landslides analysis the method can be applied for topographic corrections and removing deposited material from other surface processes.
评估滑坡破坏面深度和体积:一种新的样条插值方法
山体滑坡对社区和基础设施构成重大威胁,特别是在山区。准确估计滑坡滑面深度/几何形状和位移材料的体积对于危害评估、钻孔规划和减灾战略至关重要。本文提出了一种基于样条插值的新颖、经济的方法,利用数字高程模型(DEM)数据来估计滑动面深度,特别是在野外数据有限的地区。该方法依赖于暴露的边界陡坡,这使得它特别适用于有碎石覆盖的失稳斜坡或发育良好的缓慢移动的滑坡,其中滑动面位于滑动材料的下方。该方法在加拿大西部的Hope Slide和Downie Slide两个案例中得到了验证。结果表明,内插的滑动面几何形状提供的深度估计和体积分布与现有数据密切相关,其中希望滑动的最大体积约为6100万立方米,唐尼滑动的最大体积约为9亿立方米。由于该方法是迭代的,可以根据要求在满足一定的坡角、深度或体积时确定停止准则。此外,该算法还可以灵活地包括与滑动面相关的任何附加数据,例如3D暴露平面或1D井眼深度。通过提供额外的数据并在估计最终滑动面几何形状方面显示出改进的结果,在案例研究中进行了测试。除了滑坡分析之外,该方法还可以应用于地形校正和清除其他地表过程中的沉积物质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Engineering Geology
Engineering Geology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
12.20%
发文量
327
审稿时长
5.6 months
期刊介绍: Engineering Geology, an international interdisciplinary journal, serves as a bridge between earth sciences and engineering, focusing on geological and geotechnical engineering. It welcomes studies with relevance to engineering, environmental concerns, and safety, catering to engineering geologists with backgrounds in geology or civil/mining engineering. Topics include applied geomorphology, structural geology, geophysics, geochemistry, environmental geology, hydrogeology, land use planning, natural hazards, remote sensing, soil and rock mechanics, and applied geotechnical engineering. The journal provides a platform for research at the intersection of geology and engineering disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信