“The grief exists in a bubble that the rest of the world doesn't see”: Exploring biographical disruption and meaning-making amongst people bereaved during the Covid-19 pandemic
IF 5 2区 医学Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Emily Harrop , Kali Barawi , Francesca Mazzaschi , Anna Torrens-Burton , Eileen Sutton , Emma Gilbert , Donna Wakefield , Silvia Goss , Kathy Seddon , Mirella Longo , Lucy E. Selman
{"title":"“The grief exists in a bubble that the rest of the world doesn't see”: Exploring biographical disruption and meaning-making amongst people bereaved during the Covid-19 pandemic","authors":"Emily Harrop , Kali Barawi , Francesca Mazzaschi , Anna Torrens-Burton , Eileen Sutton , Emma Gilbert , Donna Wakefield , Silvia Goss , Kathy Seddon , Mirella Longo , Lucy E. Selman","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>People bereaved during the Covid-19 pandemic experienced profoundly altered death, mourning and grieving practices. Worsened grief outcomes have been widely reported but less is known about how people coped during these unprecedented times. Using reflexive thematic analysis critically informed by theories of biographical disruption and meaning-making, we analysed 39 interview transcripts from 24 people bereaved during the pandemic in the UK. We describe five core domains of disruption and associated meaning making: difficult and traumatic death experiences; disrupted mourning practices; loss of relationship and sense of self; social relationships, isolation and support; and developing understandings of grief. While the multi-dimensionality and severity of the disruption experienced was striking, so too were the ways in which people reappraised and reconstructed more positive and coherent accounts, often in relational ways, helping to explain their varied grief and coping experiences. Findings demonstrate the utility of critically combining these theoretical frameworks for conceptualising and contextualising grieving during ‘extraordinary’, as well as more ‘ordinary’ times. Implications are identified for minimising the disruption inherent in stressful bereavement circumstances, whilst also supporting people to reconcile and make meaning in their experiences.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"384 ","pages":"Article 118518"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625008494","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
People bereaved during the Covid-19 pandemic experienced profoundly altered death, mourning and grieving practices. Worsened grief outcomes have been widely reported but less is known about how people coped during these unprecedented times. Using reflexive thematic analysis critically informed by theories of biographical disruption and meaning-making, we analysed 39 interview transcripts from 24 people bereaved during the pandemic in the UK. We describe five core domains of disruption and associated meaning making: difficult and traumatic death experiences; disrupted mourning practices; loss of relationship and sense of self; social relationships, isolation and support; and developing understandings of grief. While the multi-dimensionality and severity of the disruption experienced was striking, so too were the ways in which people reappraised and reconstructed more positive and coherent accounts, often in relational ways, helping to explain their varied grief and coping experiences. Findings demonstrate the utility of critically combining these theoretical frameworks for conceptualising and contextualising grieving during ‘extraordinary’, as well as more ‘ordinary’ times. Implications are identified for minimising the disruption inherent in stressful bereavement circumstances, whilst also supporting people to reconcile and make meaning in their experiences.
期刊介绍:
Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.