Automated SEM-EDS mineralogical characterisation of archaeological pottery from Luxmanda and Mumba Rockshelter, Tanzania

IF 1.5 2区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY
Titus Luomba Ombori , Duncan Pirrie , Matthew R. Power , Ian Skilling , Agness O. Gidna , Audax Z.P. Mabulla , Pastory M. Bushozi , Mary E. Prendergast , Katherine M. Grillo
{"title":"Automated SEM-EDS mineralogical characterisation of archaeological pottery from Luxmanda and Mumba Rockshelter, Tanzania","authors":"Titus Luomba Ombori ,&nbsp;Duncan Pirrie ,&nbsp;Matthew R. Power ,&nbsp;Ian Skilling ,&nbsp;Agness O. Gidna ,&nbsp;Audax Z.P. Mabulla ,&nbsp;Pastory M. Bushozi ,&nbsp;Mary E. Prendergast ,&nbsp;Katherine M. Grillo","doi":"10.1016/j.jasrep.2025.105369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study presents the first application of automated scanning electron microscopy with linked energy dispersive spectrometry (SEM-EDS) to characterise “Narosura” Pastoral Neolithic (PN) pottery from the Luxmanda site in northern Tanzania. Additional samples from Mumba Rockshelter in the Eyasi Basin are also presented for comparison. The PN period in eastern Africa (∼5000–1200 BP) was characterised by the spread of domestic livestock and new forms of material culture associated with pastoralism. Despite extensive pottery macro-typological analysis in this region, few studies have focused on the mineralogical composition and provenance of the raw materials for PN pottery production. By examining 13 pottery samples using automated SEM-EDS, this study has identified four distinct mineralogical groups, each of which reflect the localised sourcing of raw materials for ceramic manufacture. The findings reveal differences in raw material sources suggesting varying pottery production techniques and cultural practices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48150,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports","volume":"67 ","pages":"Article 105369"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Archaeological Science-Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X2500402X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents the first application of automated scanning electron microscopy with linked energy dispersive spectrometry (SEM-EDS) to characterise “Narosura” Pastoral Neolithic (PN) pottery from the Luxmanda site in northern Tanzania. Additional samples from Mumba Rockshelter in the Eyasi Basin are also presented for comparison. The PN period in eastern Africa (∼5000–1200 BP) was characterised by the spread of domestic livestock and new forms of material culture associated with pastoralism. Despite extensive pottery macro-typological analysis in this region, few studies have focused on the mineralogical composition and provenance of the raw materials for PN pottery production. By examining 13 pottery samples using automated SEM-EDS, this study has identified four distinct mineralogical groups, each of which reflect the localised sourcing of raw materials for ceramic manufacture. The findings reveal differences in raw material sources suggesting varying pottery production techniques and cultural practices.
坦桑尼亚卢克曼达和孟买石窟考古陶器的自动SEM-EDS矿物学特征
这项研究首次应用自动扫描电子显微镜与链接能量色散光谱(SEM-EDS)来表征来自坦桑尼亚北部Luxmanda遗址的“Narosura”田园新石器时代(PN)陶器。此外,还提供了来自埃亚西盆地孟买岩洞的其他样本进行比较。非洲东部PN时期(约5000-1200年前)的特征是家畜的传播和与畜牧业相关的新形式的物质文化。尽管对该地区陶器宏观类型进行了广泛的分析,但对生产PN陶器原料的矿物学组成和物源的研究很少。通过使用自动SEM-EDS检查13个陶器样本,本研究确定了四个不同的矿物学组,每个组都反映了陶瓷制造原材料的本地来源。这些发现揭示了原料来源的差异,表明了不同的陶器制作技术和文化习俗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
405
期刊介绍: Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports is aimed at archaeologists and scientists engaged with the application of scientific techniques and methodologies to all areas of archaeology. The journal focuses on the results of the application of scientific methods to archaeological problems and debates. It will provide a forum for reviews and scientific debate of issues in scientific archaeology and their impact in the wider subject. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports will publish papers of excellent archaeological science, with regional or wider interest. This will include case studies, reviews and short papers where an established scientific technique sheds light on archaeological questions and debates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信