Catalyst driven optimization of cogasification and economic evaluation for enriched hydrogen syngas production from lignocellulosic waste toward biorefinery applications
Suhaib Umer Ilyas , Muddasser Inayat , Muhammad Shahbaz , Shaharin A. Sulaiman , Noor A. Merdad , Aymn Abdulrahman
{"title":"Catalyst driven optimization of cogasification and economic evaluation for enriched hydrogen syngas production from lignocellulosic waste toward biorefinery applications","authors":"Suhaib Umer Ilyas , Muddasser Inayat , Muhammad Shahbaz , Shaharin A. Sulaiman , Noor A. Merdad , Aymn Abdulrahman","doi":"10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.108338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Growing environmental concerns have driven the search for renewable energy sources, particularly H<sub>2</sub> production. This study evaluated conversion of coconut shells and wood blends in downdraft gasifier to maximize H<sub>2</sub> yield and minimize tar formation in syngas, using mineral catalysts of cement, dolomite, and limestone. Effects of key parameters temperature (700–900 °C), catalyst loading (0–30 wt%), and blending ratio (20–80 wt%) were investigated. Process optimization was performed in Design of Expert and economic analysis was carried out at optimal conditions. Results revealed that dolomite achieved highest H<sub>2</sub> yield, with significant increased from 4.49 to 23.31 vol% as temperature varied from 700 to 900 °C at 15 wt% catalyst loading. In case of cement, H<sub>2</sub> yield increased from 13.22 to 20.57 vol% followed by limestone. CO yield increased from 17.82 to 25.96 vol% at higher temperature. coconut shell proportion in blend marginally improved CO yield. However, higher catalyst loading reduced CO yield. Among all catalysts, limestone yielded highest CO (30.13 vol%) at 900 °C, 30 wt% catalyst loading, and CS50:W50 blend. Tar formation was reduced significantly from 8.02 to 1.17 g/Nm<sup>3</sup> with increasing temperature and catalyst loading (dolomite case). Under optimal conditions (900 °C, 30 wt% catalyst loading, CS50:W50) process achieved maximum 23.31 vol% H<sub>2</sub> yield and minimum 1.17 g/Nm<sup>3</sup> tar formation. Economic analysis indicated 3.09 MYR/kg syngas production cost that could be further reduced by process scale-up and adopting autothermal gasification. Overall, this study aids in selecting an effective catalyst for biomass gasification and provides an economic analysis to assess its commercial viability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":253,"journal":{"name":"Biomass & Bioenergy","volume":"203 ","pages":"Article 108338"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomass & Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0961953425007494","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Growing environmental concerns have driven the search for renewable energy sources, particularly H2 production. This study evaluated conversion of coconut shells and wood blends in downdraft gasifier to maximize H2 yield and minimize tar formation in syngas, using mineral catalysts of cement, dolomite, and limestone. Effects of key parameters temperature (700–900 °C), catalyst loading (0–30 wt%), and blending ratio (20–80 wt%) were investigated. Process optimization was performed in Design of Expert and economic analysis was carried out at optimal conditions. Results revealed that dolomite achieved highest H2 yield, with significant increased from 4.49 to 23.31 vol% as temperature varied from 700 to 900 °C at 15 wt% catalyst loading. In case of cement, H2 yield increased from 13.22 to 20.57 vol% followed by limestone. CO yield increased from 17.82 to 25.96 vol% at higher temperature. coconut shell proportion in blend marginally improved CO yield. However, higher catalyst loading reduced CO yield. Among all catalysts, limestone yielded highest CO (30.13 vol%) at 900 °C, 30 wt% catalyst loading, and CS50:W50 blend. Tar formation was reduced significantly from 8.02 to 1.17 g/Nm3 with increasing temperature and catalyst loading (dolomite case). Under optimal conditions (900 °C, 30 wt% catalyst loading, CS50:W50) process achieved maximum 23.31 vol% H2 yield and minimum 1.17 g/Nm3 tar formation. Economic analysis indicated 3.09 MYR/kg syngas production cost that could be further reduced by process scale-up and adopting autothermal gasification. Overall, this study aids in selecting an effective catalyst for biomass gasification and provides an economic analysis to assess its commercial viability.
期刊介绍:
Biomass & Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers and short communications, review articles and case studies on biological resources, chemical and biological processes, and biomass products for new renewable sources of energy and materials.
The scope of the journal extends to the environmental, management and economic aspects of biomass and bioenergy.
Key areas covered by the journal:
• Biomass: sources, energy crop production processes, genetic improvements, composition. Please note that research on these biomass subjects must be linked directly to bioenergy generation.
• Biological Residues: residues/rests from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (palm, sugar etc), processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW). Papers on the use of biomass residues through innovative processes/technological novelty and/or consideration of feedstock/system sustainability (or unsustainability) are welcomed. However waste treatment processes and pollution control or mitigation which are only tangentially related to bioenergy are not in the scope of the journal, as they are more suited to publications in the environmental arena. Papers that describe conventional waste streams (ie well described in existing literature) that do not empirically address ''new'' added value from the process are not suitable for submission to the journal.
• Bioenergy Processes: fermentations, thermochemical conversions, liquid and gaseous fuels, and petrochemical substitutes
• Bioenergy Utilization: direct combustion, gasification, electricity production, chemical processes, and by-product remediation
• Biomass and the Environment: carbon cycle, the net energy efficiency of bioenergy systems, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues.