Catalyst driven optimization of cogasification and economic evaluation for enriched hydrogen syngas production from lignocellulosic waste toward biorefinery applications

IF 5.8 2区 生物学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING
Suhaib Umer Ilyas , Muddasser Inayat , Muhammad Shahbaz , Shaharin A. Sulaiman , Noor A. Merdad , Aymn Abdulrahman
{"title":"Catalyst driven optimization of cogasification and economic evaluation for enriched hydrogen syngas production from lignocellulosic waste toward biorefinery applications","authors":"Suhaib Umer Ilyas ,&nbsp;Muddasser Inayat ,&nbsp;Muhammad Shahbaz ,&nbsp;Shaharin A. Sulaiman ,&nbsp;Noor A. Merdad ,&nbsp;Aymn Abdulrahman","doi":"10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.108338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Growing environmental concerns have driven the search for renewable energy sources, particularly H<sub>2</sub> production. This study evaluated conversion of coconut shells and wood blends in downdraft gasifier to maximize H<sub>2</sub> yield and minimize tar formation in syngas, using mineral catalysts of cement, dolomite, and limestone. Effects of key parameters temperature (700–900 °C), catalyst loading (0–30 wt%), and blending ratio (20–80 wt%) were investigated. Process optimization was performed in Design of Expert and economic analysis was carried out at optimal conditions. Results revealed that dolomite achieved highest H<sub>2</sub> yield, with significant increased from 4.49 to 23.31 vol% as temperature varied from 700 to 900 °C at 15 wt% catalyst loading. In case of cement, H<sub>2</sub> yield increased from 13.22 to 20.57 vol% followed by limestone. CO yield increased from 17.82 to 25.96 vol% at higher temperature. coconut shell proportion in blend marginally improved CO yield. However, higher catalyst loading reduced CO yield. Among all catalysts, limestone yielded highest CO (30.13 vol%) at 900 °C, 30 wt% catalyst loading, and CS50:W50 blend. Tar formation was reduced significantly from 8.02 to 1.17 g/Nm<sup>3</sup> with increasing temperature and catalyst loading (dolomite case). Under optimal conditions (900 °C, 30 wt% catalyst loading, CS50:W50) process achieved maximum 23.31 vol% H<sub>2</sub> yield and minimum 1.17 g/Nm<sup>3</sup> tar formation. Economic analysis indicated 3.09 MYR/kg syngas production cost that could be further reduced by process scale-up and adopting autothermal gasification. Overall, this study aids in selecting an effective catalyst for biomass gasification and provides an economic analysis to assess its commercial viability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":253,"journal":{"name":"Biomass & Bioenergy","volume":"203 ","pages":"Article 108338"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomass & Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0961953425007494","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Growing environmental concerns have driven the search for renewable energy sources, particularly H2 production. This study evaluated conversion of coconut shells and wood blends in downdraft gasifier to maximize H2 yield and minimize tar formation in syngas, using mineral catalysts of cement, dolomite, and limestone. Effects of key parameters temperature (700–900 °C), catalyst loading (0–30 wt%), and blending ratio (20–80 wt%) were investigated. Process optimization was performed in Design of Expert and economic analysis was carried out at optimal conditions. Results revealed that dolomite achieved highest H2 yield, with significant increased from 4.49 to 23.31 vol% as temperature varied from 700 to 900 °C at 15 wt% catalyst loading. In case of cement, H2 yield increased from 13.22 to 20.57 vol% followed by limestone. CO yield increased from 17.82 to 25.96 vol% at higher temperature. coconut shell proportion in blend marginally improved CO yield. However, higher catalyst loading reduced CO yield. Among all catalysts, limestone yielded highest CO (30.13 vol%) at 900 °C, 30 wt% catalyst loading, and CS50:W50 blend. Tar formation was reduced significantly from 8.02 to 1.17 g/Nm3 with increasing temperature and catalyst loading (dolomite case). Under optimal conditions (900 °C, 30 wt% catalyst loading, CS50:W50) process achieved maximum 23.31 vol% H2 yield and minimum 1.17 g/Nm3 tar formation. Economic analysis indicated 3.09 MYR/kg syngas production cost that could be further reduced by process scale-up and adopting autothermal gasification. Overall, this study aids in selecting an effective catalyst for biomass gasification and provides an economic analysis to assess its commercial viability.

Abstract Image

催化剂驱动的共气化优化及从木质纤维素废弃物生产富氢合成气用于生物炼制的经济评价
日益增长的环境问题促使人们寻找可再生能源,特别是氢气生产。本研究评估了椰子壳和木材混合物在下吸式气化炉中的转化,以最大限度地提高H2产量,并减少合成气中的焦油形成,使用水泥、白云石和石灰石矿物催化剂。考察了温度(700 ~ 900℃)、催化剂负载(0 ~ 30 wt%)、掺合比(20 ~ 80 wt%)等关键参数的影响。在Design of Expert中进行工艺优化,并在最优条件下进行经济分析。结果表明,在催化剂负载为15 wt%的条件下,当温度在700 ~ 900℃范围内变化时,白云石的H2产率从4.49%显著提高到23.31%。水泥的H2产率从13.22%提高到20.57 vol%,其次是石灰石。在较高温度下,CO产率由17.82%提高到25.96%。混合中椰子壳的比例略微提高了CO产量。然而,较高的催化剂负载降低了CO产率。在所有催化剂中,石灰石在900°C、30 wt%催化剂负载和CS50:W50混合时CO产量最高(30.13 vol%)。随着温度和催化剂负载(白云石)的增加,焦油生成量从8.02 g/Nm3显著降低到1.17 g/Nm3。在最佳条件下(900°C, 30 wt%催化剂负载,CS50:W50),该工艺获得了最大23.31 vol%的H2产率和最小1.17 g/Nm3的焦油生成。经济分析表明,通过扩大工艺规模和采用自热气化,可以进一步降低3.09马币/千克合成气生产成本。总的来说,这项研究有助于选择有效的生物质气化催化剂,并提供经济分析来评估其商业可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biomass & Bioenergy
Biomass & Bioenergy 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
3.30%
发文量
258
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Biomass & Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers and short communications, review articles and case studies on biological resources, chemical and biological processes, and biomass products for new renewable sources of energy and materials. The scope of the journal extends to the environmental, management and economic aspects of biomass and bioenergy. Key areas covered by the journal: • Biomass: sources, energy crop production processes, genetic improvements, composition. Please note that research on these biomass subjects must be linked directly to bioenergy generation. • Biological Residues: residues/rests from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (palm, sugar etc), processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW). Papers on the use of biomass residues through innovative processes/technological novelty and/or consideration of feedstock/system sustainability (or unsustainability) are welcomed. However waste treatment processes and pollution control or mitigation which are only tangentially related to bioenergy are not in the scope of the journal, as they are more suited to publications in the environmental arena. Papers that describe conventional waste streams (ie well described in existing literature) that do not empirically address ''new'' added value from the process are not suitable for submission to the journal. • Bioenergy Processes: fermentations, thermochemical conversions, liquid and gaseous fuels, and petrochemical substitutes • Bioenergy Utilization: direct combustion, gasification, electricity production, chemical processes, and by-product remediation • Biomass and the Environment: carbon cycle, the net energy efficiency of bioenergy systems, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信