Challenges in pediatric cardiac emergency care amid nursing and resource shortages in Germany

IF 1.7 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Georg Daniel Duerr , Dietmar Schranz
{"title":"Challenges in pediatric cardiac emergency care amid nursing and resource shortages in Germany","authors":"Georg Daniel Duerr ,&nbsp;Dietmar Schranz","doi":"10.1016/j.cegh.2025.102165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Pediatric cardiac emergency care in Germany faces critical challenges due to ICU bed shortages, rigid healthcare policies, and nursing workforce deficits. The strict adherence to the Paediatric Cardiac Surgery Directive (PCSD) often prevents critically ill children from receiving timely life-saving interventions, as policies restrict their admission to adult intensive care units (AICUs), even in urgent situations.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>comparative cross-national report.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study employs a comparative approach, analyzing pediatric cardiac care models in the United Kingdom, New Zealand, and Australia. These countries have implemented flexible, interdisciplinary strategies to address ICU capacity issues, ensuring critically ill children receive timely surgical and postoperative care. Literature from PubMed and national healthcare policy frameworks were reviewed to assess their applicability to Germany.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Findings indicate that integrating pediatric and adult intensive care services, along with flexible policy adaptations, can improve emergency care accessibility. International models emphasize interdisciplinary collaboration, specialized training for adult ICU staff, and structured transitional care for pediatric cardiac patients.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Policy adaptations are required in the German healthcare system to enhance pediatric cardiac emergency care. Implementing flexible ICU admission protocols, cross-disciplinary training, and optimizing resource allocation can bridge critical gaps. A modernized, patient-centered approach is essential to ensuring equitable and timely access to life-saving pediatric cardiac interventions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46404,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health","volume":"35 ","pages":"Article 102165"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213398425002556","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Pediatric cardiac emergency care in Germany faces critical challenges due to ICU bed shortages, rigid healthcare policies, and nursing workforce deficits. The strict adherence to the Paediatric Cardiac Surgery Directive (PCSD) often prevents critically ill children from receiving timely life-saving interventions, as policies restrict their admission to adult intensive care units (AICUs), even in urgent situations.

Study design

comparative cross-national report.

Methods

This study employs a comparative approach, analyzing pediatric cardiac care models in the United Kingdom, New Zealand, and Australia. These countries have implemented flexible, interdisciplinary strategies to address ICU capacity issues, ensuring critically ill children receive timely surgical and postoperative care. Literature from PubMed and national healthcare policy frameworks were reviewed to assess their applicability to Germany.

Results

Findings indicate that integrating pediatric and adult intensive care services, along with flexible policy adaptations, can improve emergency care accessibility. International models emphasize interdisciplinary collaboration, specialized training for adult ICU staff, and structured transitional care for pediatric cardiac patients.

Conclusions

Policy adaptations are required in the German healthcare system to enhance pediatric cardiac emergency care. Implementing flexible ICU admission protocols, cross-disciplinary training, and optimizing resource allocation can bridge critical gaps. A modernized, patient-centered approach is essential to ensuring equitable and timely access to life-saving pediatric cardiac interventions.
在护理和资源短缺的德国儿科心脏急诊护理的挑战
目的:由于ICU床位短缺、僵化的医疗政策和护理人员短缺,德国的儿科心脏病急诊护理面临着严峻的挑战。严格遵守《儿科心脏外科指令》(PCSD)往往会使危重儿童无法及时接受挽救生命的干预措施,因为政策限制他们入住成人重症监护病房(aicu),即使在紧急情况下也是如此。研究设计:比较跨国报告。方法本研究采用比较方法,分析了英国、新西兰和澳大利亚的儿童心脏护理模式。这些国家实施了灵活的跨学科战略,以解决ICU能力问题,确保危重儿童及时获得手术和术后护理。对PubMed和国家医疗保健政策框架的文献进行了审查,以评估其对德国的适用性。结果研究结果表明,整合儿科和成人重症监护服务,以及灵活的政策调整,可以提高急诊护理的可及性。国际模式强调跨学科合作,对成人ICU工作人员的专业培训,以及对儿科心脏病患者的结构化过渡护理。结论德国卫生保健系统需要调整政策以加强儿童心脏急诊护理。实施灵活的ICU入院方案、跨学科培训和优化资源分配可以弥合关键的差距。现代化的、以患者为中心的方法对于确保公平和及时获得挽救生命的儿科心脏干预措施至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health
Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
218
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health (CEGH) is a multidisciplinary journal and it is published four times (March, June, September, December) a year. The mandate of CEGH is to promote articles on clinical epidemiology with focus on developing countries in the context of global health. We also accept articles from other countries. It publishes original research work across all disciplines of medicine and allied sciences, related to clinical epidemiology and global health. The journal publishes Original articles, Review articles, Evidence Summaries, Letters to the Editor. All articles published in CEGH are peer-reviewed and published online for immediate access and citation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信