The role of qualitative methods in shaping policy on employment rights for people with disabilities in Uganda

Andrew Griffiths , Stevens Bechange , Hannah Loryman , Monica Ndoria , Adetokunbo Johnson , Graham Long
{"title":"The role of qualitative methods in shaping policy on employment rights for people with disabilities in Uganda","authors":"Andrew Griffiths ,&nbsp;Stevens Bechange ,&nbsp;Hannah Loryman ,&nbsp;Monica Ndoria ,&nbsp;Adetokunbo Johnson ,&nbsp;Graham Long","doi":"10.1016/j.socimp.2025.100146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There is widespread evidence that people with disabilities face challenges, including discrimination, in accessing labour markets: however, there is much less evidence around how the rights to employment of persons with disabilities should be implemented within national legal frameworks. Our current study looks at this question in the context of Uganda where, despite an estimated 12 % of the population living with a disability, data and evidence on the employment of people with disabilities, and on implementation of relevant anti-discrimination law, is scarce. We present our methodology and some early results of a mixed-methods, participatory research project examining policy implementation. One key finding is that the information-gathering interviews conducted with policy actors have themselves changed the perceptions and intentions of these actors. We reflect on potential explanations of these results and situate them in relevant debates around participant-researcher relationships. Lastly, we consider how significant the implications for policy implementation, and change-oriented research more generally, might be.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101167,"journal":{"name":"Societal Impacts","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Societal Impacts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949697725000451","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is widespread evidence that people with disabilities face challenges, including discrimination, in accessing labour markets: however, there is much less evidence around how the rights to employment of persons with disabilities should be implemented within national legal frameworks. Our current study looks at this question in the context of Uganda where, despite an estimated 12 % of the population living with a disability, data and evidence on the employment of people with disabilities, and on implementation of relevant anti-discrimination law, is scarce. We present our methodology and some early results of a mixed-methods, participatory research project examining policy implementation. One key finding is that the information-gathering interviews conducted with policy actors have themselves changed the perceptions and intentions of these actors. We reflect on potential explanations of these results and situate them in relevant debates around participant-researcher relationships. Lastly, we consider how significant the implications for policy implementation, and change-oriented research more generally, might be.
定性方法在制定乌干达残疾人就业权利政策方面的作用
有广泛证据表明,残疾人在进入劳动力市场方面面临包括歧视在内的挑战;然而,关于如何在国家法律框架内落实残疾人的就业权利的证据却少得多。我们目前的研究着眼于乌干达背景下的这个问题,尽管估计有12% %的人口生活在残疾人中,但关于残疾人就业和相关反歧视法实施的数据和证据很少。我们介绍了我们的方法和一些混合方法的早期结果,参与性研究项目检查政策实施。一个关键的发现是,对政策行为者进行的信息收集访谈本身就改变了这些行为者的看法和意图。我们反思了这些结果的潜在解释,并将它们置于围绕参与者-研究人员关系的相关辩论中。最后,我们考虑了政策实施的重要意义,以及更普遍的以变革为导向的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信