Philippe Lambin, Henry C. Woodruff, Shruti Atul Mali, Xian Zhong, Sheng Kuang, Elizaveta Lavrova, Hamza Khan, Karim Lekadir, Alex Zwanenburg, Joseph Deasy, Maciej Bobowicz, Luis Marti-Bonmati, Andrew Maidment, Michel Dumontier, Paul E. Kinahan, J. Martijn Nobel, Sina Amirrajab, Zohaib Salahuddin
{"title":"Radiomics Quality Score 2.0: towards radiomics readiness levels and clinical translation for personalized medicine","authors":"Philippe Lambin, Henry C. Woodruff, Shruti Atul Mali, Xian Zhong, Sheng Kuang, Elizaveta Lavrova, Hamza Khan, Karim Lekadir, Alex Zwanenburg, Joseph Deasy, Maciej Bobowicz, Luis Marti-Bonmati, Andrew Maidment, Michel Dumontier, Paul E. Kinahan, J. Martijn Nobel, Sina Amirrajab, Zohaib Salahuddin","doi":"10.1038/s41571-025-01067-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Radiomics is a tool for medical imaging analysis that could have a relevant role in precision oncology by offering precise quantitative support for clinical decision-making. The Radiomics Quality Score (RQS) is a tool developed to assess the rigour of radiomics studies that has now been widely adopted by researchers. Although RQS version 1.0 established a benchmark, an updated framework is required to account for evolving knowledge and ensure optimal evaluation of the quality of radiomics studies through the inclusion of fairness, explainability, rigorous quality control and harmonization. In this Review, we introduce the updated RQS 2.0, which maintains the scientific rigour of its predecessor and addresses these contemporary needs, and therefore could potentially accelerate clinical translation. Moreover, we introduce the radiomics readiness levels, inspired by the technology readiness level framework, which are integrated in RQS 2.0 and reflect nine distinct levels of incremental improvement in radiomics research with the ultimate aim of clinical implementation. We also detail anticipated future directions in radiomics, outlining a strategic vision to advance precision oncology, which is the ultimate aim of RQS 2.0.</p>","PeriodicalId":19079,"journal":{"name":"Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":82.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-025-01067-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Radiomics is a tool for medical imaging analysis that could have a relevant role in precision oncology by offering precise quantitative support for clinical decision-making. The Radiomics Quality Score (RQS) is a tool developed to assess the rigour of radiomics studies that has now been widely adopted by researchers. Although RQS version 1.0 established a benchmark, an updated framework is required to account for evolving knowledge and ensure optimal evaluation of the quality of radiomics studies through the inclusion of fairness, explainability, rigorous quality control and harmonization. In this Review, we introduce the updated RQS 2.0, which maintains the scientific rigour of its predecessor and addresses these contemporary needs, and therefore could potentially accelerate clinical translation. Moreover, we introduce the radiomics readiness levels, inspired by the technology readiness level framework, which are integrated in RQS 2.0 and reflect nine distinct levels of incremental improvement in radiomics research with the ultimate aim of clinical implementation. We also detail anticipated future directions in radiomics, outlining a strategic vision to advance precision oncology, which is the ultimate aim of RQS 2.0.
期刊介绍:
Nature Reviews publishes clinical content authored by internationally renowned clinical academics and researchers, catering to readers in the medical sciences at postgraduate levels and beyond. Although targeted at practicing doctors, researchers, and academics within specific specialties, the aim is to ensure accessibility for readers across various medical disciplines. The journal features in-depth Reviews offering authoritative and current information, contextualizing topics within the history and development of a field. Perspectives, News & Views articles, and the Research Highlights section provide topical discussions, opinions, and filtered primary research from diverse medical journals.