Erin A McClure,Megan E Piper,Laura E Crotty Alexander,Ellen L Burnham,Tom P Freeman,Panagis Galiatsatos,Adam Edward Lang,Dustin C Lee,Frank T Leone,Anne C Melzer,Robin J Mermelstein,LaTrice Montgomery,Rachel A Rabin,Danielle M Smith,Gideon St Helen,Andrea H Weinberger,Hasmeena Kathuria
{"title":"Effects of Inhaled Tobacco and Cannabis Co-Use on Respiratory Health and Tobacco Cessation. An Official American Thoracic Society Research Statement.","authors":"Erin A McClure,Megan E Piper,Laura E Crotty Alexander,Ellen L Burnham,Tom P Freeman,Panagis Galiatsatos,Adam Edward Lang,Dustin C Lee,Frank T Leone,Anne C Melzer,Robin J Mermelstein,LaTrice Montgomery,Rachel A Rabin,Danielle M Smith,Gideon St Helen,Andrea H Weinberger,Hasmeena Kathuria","doi":"10.1164/rccm.202507-1792st","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nTobacco and cannabis are among the most widely used substances globally, and rates of co-use are on the rise. Understanding the impact of inhaled tobacco-cannabis co-use on health outcomes and tobacco cessation is critical for guiding patients and clinicians.\r\n\r\nOBJECTIVES\r\nTo summarize the existing evidence, identify knowledge gaps, and prioritize research questions related to effects of inhaled tobacco-cannabis co-use on tobacco cessation and lung health.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nA multidisciplinary committee was convened to review the evidence, identify knowledge gaps, and develop research questions in four priority research areas: 1) common data elements and terminology; 2) patterns and prevalence of co-use; 3) impact of co-use on tobacco cessation; and 4) effects of co-use on lung health. A modified Delphi process was conducted in three rounds to reach consensus on prioritizing research questions.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThe evidence reviewed by the expert panel in four priority research areas yielded the following gaps in the literature with high priority to address with future research: 1) lack of consensus on terminology and recommended co-use data elements; 2) limited research on co-use and tobacco-related disparities; 3) insufficient evidence on how cannabis use affects tobacco cessation; and 4) alarming yet inconsistent findings on the effects of co-use on lung health.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nThis statement outlines and guides a research agenda on the effects of inhaled tobacco-cannabis co-use on tobacco cessation and lung health. Consensus-driven recommendations include adopting harmonized terms and minimum data elements; studying the prevalence of co-use among populations experiencing tobacco-related disparities; evaluating the impact of co-use on tobacco cessation pharmacotherapies; and assessing the effects of co-use on the development and progression of lung diseases.","PeriodicalId":7664,"journal":{"name":"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":19.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202507-1792st","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Tobacco and cannabis are among the most widely used substances globally, and rates of co-use are on the rise. Understanding the impact of inhaled tobacco-cannabis co-use on health outcomes and tobacco cessation is critical for guiding patients and clinicians.
OBJECTIVES
To summarize the existing evidence, identify knowledge gaps, and prioritize research questions related to effects of inhaled tobacco-cannabis co-use on tobacco cessation and lung health.
METHODS
A multidisciplinary committee was convened to review the evidence, identify knowledge gaps, and develop research questions in four priority research areas: 1) common data elements and terminology; 2) patterns and prevalence of co-use; 3) impact of co-use on tobacco cessation; and 4) effects of co-use on lung health. A modified Delphi process was conducted in three rounds to reach consensus on prioritizing research questions.
RESULTS
The evidence reviewed by the expert panel in four priority research areas yielded the following gaps in the literature with high priority to address with future research: 1) lack of consensus on terminology and recommended co-use data elements; 2) limited research on co-use and tobacco-related disparities; 3) insufficient evidence on how cannabis use affects tobacco cessation; and 4) alarming yet inconsistent findings on the effects of co-use on lung health.
CONCLUSIONS
This statement outlines and guides a research agenda on the effects of inhaled tobacco-cannabis co-use on tobacco cessation and lung health. Consensus-driven recommendations include adopting harmonized terms and minimum data elements; studying the prevalence of co-use among populations experiencing tobacco-related disparities; evaluating the impact of co-use on tobacco cessation pharmacotherapies; and assessing the effects of co-use on the development and progression of lung diseases.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine focuses on human biology and disease, as well as animal studies that contribute to the understanding of pathophysiology and treatment of diseases that affect the respiratory system and critically ill patients. Papers that are solely or predominantly based in cell and molecular biology are published in the companion journal, the American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology. The Journal also seeks to publish clinical trials and outstanding review articles on areas of interest in several forms. The State-of-the-Art review is a treatise usually covering a broad field that brings bench research to the bedside. Shorter reviews are published as Critical Care Perspectives or Pulmonary Perspectives. These are generally focused on a more limited area and advance a concerted opinion about care for a specific process. Concise Clinical Reviews provide an evidence-based synthesis of the literature pertaining to topics of fundamental importance to the practice of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. Images providing advances or unusual contributions to the field are published as Images in Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep Medicine and the Sciences.
A recent trend and future direction of the Journal has been to include debates of a topical nature on issues of importance in pulmonary and critical care medicine and to the membership of the American Thoracic Society. Other recent changes have included encompassing works from the field of critical care medicine and the extension of the editorial governing of journal policy to colleagues outside of the United States of America. The focus and direction of the Journal is to establish an international forum for state-of-the-art respiratory and critical care medicine.