The Diversity Paradox: The Unintended Consequences of Gender Diversity on Gender Pay Equity

IF 9 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Claudia Holtschlag, Carlos Morales, Aline Masuda, B. Sebastian Reiche
{"title":"The Diversity Paradox: The Unintended Consequences of Gender Diversity on Gender Pay Equity","authors":"Claudia Holtschlag,&nbsp;Carlos Morales,&nbsp;Aline Masuda,&nbsp;B. Sebastian Reiche","doi":"10.1002/hrm.22308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>We examine how gender diversity and employees' internal pay position interact to explain gender differences in pay raises. Integrating equity theory and institutional theory, we argue that pay raises are guided by equity-based reward allocation policies. Further, we expect a decoupling between these policies and their implementation if other gender diversity goals, such as a balanced ratio of female and male employees at the work-unit level, are achieved. Specifically, gender diversity at the work-unit level provides legitimacy that corporate diversity goals are being pursued. This makes the implementation of reward allocation policies aimed at increasing gender pay equity less salient in work units with high levels of gender diversity. We test our hypotheses using a multilevel moderated mediation model on a longitudinal sample of 9,246 observations from 4,003 employees in a large German company. Our results show an indirect effect of gender on pay increases over 3 years via compa ratio (i.e., the relative pay position for a given job grade). In support of equity theory, the results show that women receive higher pay increases than men over time to compensate for a lower compa ratio. Moreover, in work units with high gender diversity, the indirect effect of gender on pay raise is weaker, suggesting a decoupling between equity-based reward allocation policies and their implementation. Our results offer valuable insights into the interaction of equity and institutional theory-based explanations of reaching corporate diversity goals.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48310,"journal":{"name":"Human Resource Management","volume":"64 5","pages":"1305-1319"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Resource Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hrm.22308","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We examine how gender diversity and employees' internal pay position interact to explain gender differences in pay raises. Integrating equity theory and institutional theory, we argue that pay raises are guided by equity-based reward allocation policies. Further, we expect a decoupling between these policies and their implementation if other gender diversity goals, such as a balanced ratio of female and male employees at the work-unit level, are achieved. Specifically, gender diversity at the work-unit level provides legitimacy that corporate diversity goals are being pursued. This makes the implementation of reward allocation policies aimed at increasing gender pay equity less salient in work units with high levels of gender diversity. We test our hypotheses using a multilevel moderated mediation model on a longitudinal sample of 9,246 observations from 4,003 employees in a large German company. Our results show an indirect effect of gender on pay increases over 3 years via compa ratio (i.e., the relative pay position for a given job grade). In support of equity theory, the results show that women receive higher pay increases than men over time to compensate for a lower compa ratio. Moreover, in work units with high gender diversity, the indirect effect of gender on pay raise is weaker, suggesting a decoupling between equity-based reward allocation policies and their implementation. Our results offer valuable insights into the interaction of equity and institutional theory-based explanations of reaching corporate diversity goals.

多样性悖论:性别多样性对性别薪酬平等的意外后果
我们研究了性别多样性和员工内部薪酬地位如何相互作用,以解释加薪中的性别差异。结合公平理论和制度理论,我们认为薪酬增长是由基于股权的奖励分配政策引导的。此外,我们预计,如果实现其他性别多样性目标,如在工作单位层面实现男女雇员的平衡比例,这些政策与其实施之间将会脱钩。具体来说,工作单位层面的性别多样性为追求公司多样性目标提供了合法性。这使得在性别高度多样化的工作单位执行旨在增加男女薪酬平等的奖励分配政策不那么突出。我们在一家大型德国公司的4,003名员工的9,246个观察的纵向样本上使用多层调节中介模型来检验我们的假设。我们的研究结果表明,通过比较比率(即给定工作等级的相对工资地位),性别对3年内的工资增长有间接影响。为了支持公平理论,研究结果表明,随着时间的推移,女性的工资增幅高于男性,以弥补较低的比较比率。此外,在性别多样性较高的工作单位中,性别对加薪的间接影响较弱,这表明基于股权的奖励分配政策与其实施之间存在脱钩。我们的研究结果为实现公司多样性目标的公平和制度理论解释之间的相互作用提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Covering the broad spectrum of contemporary human resource management, this journal provides academics and practicing managers with the latest concepts, tools, and information for effective problem solving and decision making in this field. Broad in scope, it explores issues of societal, organizational, and individual relevance. Journal articles discuss new theories, new techniques, case studies, models, and research trends of particular significance to practicing HR managers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信