Robustness and Sensitivity of the Λ*-Ratio in Microelastohydrodynamic Lubrication

IF 3.3 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Jonny Hansen, Deepak K. Prajapati, Marcus Björling, Roland Larsson
{"title":"Robustness and Sensitivity of the Λ*-Ratio in Microelastohydrodynamic Lubrication","authors":"Jonny Hansen,&nbsp;Deepak K. Prajapati,&nbsp;Marcus Björling,&nbsp;Roland Larsson","doi":"10.1007/s11249-025-02060-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study builds upon the work published by Hansen et al. (Tribol Lett 69:1–17, 2021), which introduced a revised film parameter, <span>\\({\\Lambda }^{*}={({h}_{\\text{m}}+h}_{\\text{c}}{f}_{\\text{q}})/Spk\\)</span>, for evaluating rough surface contacts in the microelastohydrodynamic (micro-EHL) and mixed lubrication (ML) regimes. The parameter incorporates a micro-EHL correction term (<span>\\({f}_{\\text{q}}\\)</span>) that accounts for different roughness lays (or pattern), the reduced peak height parameter (<span>\\(Spk\\)</span>) for more relevant roughness representation, and an updated criterion for the EHL-to-ML transition (<span>\\({\\Lambda }^{*}=1\\)</span>). These advancements address the limitations of the traditional <span>\\(\\Lambda\\)</span>-ratio by offering improved sensitivity to running-in wear, resilience to measurement artefacts, and more realistic predictions of lubrication quality. In the present study, we investigate how measurement and calculation methods influence the robustness and sensitivity of the <span>\\({\\Lambda }^{*}\\)</span>-ratio. Key considerations include the impact of spatial resolution from surface roughness measurements, the sensitivity of asperity summit radius calculation methods, and the use of amplitude reduction theory (ART) as an alternative approach to compute <span>\\({\\Lambda }^{*}\\)</span> and benchmark its performance. Within the given scope, the results show that spatial biases can be mitigated with appropriate filter sizes and that <span>\\({\\Lambda }^{*}\\)</span> consistently predicts the EHL–ML transition more accurately than the traditional Λ-ratio, regardless of the asperity radius method used. Furthermore, we found that while ART can be used to compute <span>\\({\\Lambda }^{*}\\)</span>, the original approach using the <span>\\({f}_{\\text{q}}\\)</span>-term offers both overall improved accuracy and simplicity. By critically assessing key uncertainties with <span>\\({\\Lambda }^{*}\\)</span>, this study strengthens the parameter's robustness and enhances its applicability as a reliable tool for analysing and designing tribological systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":806,"journal":{"name":"Tribology Letters","volume":"73 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11249-025-02060-6.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tribology Letters","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11249-025-02060-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study builds upon the work published by Hansen et al. (Tribol Lett 69:1–17, 2021), which introduced a revised film parameter, \({\Lambda }^{*}={({h}_{\text{m}}+h}_{\text{c}}{f}_{\text{q}})/Spk\), for evaluating rough surface contacts in the microelastohydrodynamic (micro-EHL) and mixed lubrication (ML) regimes. The parameter incorporates a micro-EHL correction term (\({f}_{\text{q}}\)) that accounts for different roughness lays (or pattern), the reduced peak height parameter (\(Spk\)) for more relevant roughness representation, and an updated criterion for the EHL-to-ML transition (\({\Lambda }^{*}=1\)). These advancements address the limitations of the traditional \(\Lambda\)-ratio by offering improved sensitivity to running-in wear, resilience to measurement artefacts, and more realistic predictions of lubrication quality. In the present study, we investigate how measurement and calculation methods influence the robustness and sensitivity of the \({\Lambda }^{*}\)-ratio. Key considerations include the impact of spatial resolution from surface roughness measurements, the sensitivity of asperity summit radius calculation methods, and the use of amplitude reduction theory (ART) as an alternative approach to compute \({\Lambda }^{*}\) and benchmark its performance. Within the given scope, the results show that spatial biases can be mitigated with appropriate filter sizes and that \({\Lambda }^{*}\) consistently predicts the EHL–ML transition more accurately than the traditional Λ-ratio, regardless of the asperity radius method used. Furthermore, we found that while ART can be used to compute \({\Lambda }^{*}\), the original approach using the \({f}_{\text{q}}\)-term offers both overall improved accuracy and simplicity. By critically assessing key uncertainties with \({\Lambda }^{*}\), this study strengthens the parameter's robustness and enhances its applicability as a reliable tool for analysing and designing tribological systems.

微弹流润滑中\({{\varLambda }}^{{*}}\) -比的鲁棒性和灵敏度
这项研究建立在Hansen等人(Tribol Lett 69:1 - 17,2021)发表的研究成果的基础上,该研究引入了一个修订的膜参数\({\Lambda }^{*}={({h}_{\text{m}}+h}_{\text{c}}{f}_{\text{q}})/Spk\),用于评估微弹性流体动力学(micro-EHL)和混合润滑(ML)体系中的粗糙表面接触。该参数包含一个micro-EHL校正项(\({f}_{\text{q}}\)),用于解释不同的粗糙度层(或模式),减少的峰高参数(\(Spk\))用于更相关的粗糙度表示,以及ehl到ml转换的更新标准(\({\Lambda }^{*}=1\))。这些进步解决了传统\(\Lambda\) -比率的局限性,提高了对磨合磨损的灵敏度,对测量工件的弹性,以及对润滑质量的更现实的预测。在本研究中,我们探讨测量和计算方法如何影响\({\Lambda }^{*}\) -比率的稳健性和灵敏度。关键考虑因素包括表面粗糙度测量对空间分辨率的影响,粗糙顶点半径计算方法的敏感性,以及使用减幅理论(ART)作为计算\({\Lambda }^{*}\)和基准性能的替代方法。在给定的范围内,结果表明,适当的过滤器大小可以减轻空间偏差,并且无论使用何种粗糙半径方法,\({\Lambda }^{*}\)都比传统的Λ-ratio更准确地预测EHL-ML过渡。此外,我们发现虽然ART可用于计算\({\Lambda }^{*}\),但使用\({f}_{\text{q}}\) -term的原始方法提供了总体上提高的准确性和简单性。通过使用\({\Lambda }^{*}\)对关键不确定性进行批判性评估,本研究增强了参数的鲁棒性,并增强了其作为分析和设计摩擦学系统的可靠工具的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tribology Letters
Tribology Letters 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
9.40%
发文量
116
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Tribology Letters is devoted to the development of the science of tribology and its applications, particularly focusing on publishing high-quality papers at the forefront of tribological science and that address the fundamentals of friction, lubrication, wear, or adhesion. The journal facilitates communication and exchange of seminal ideas among thousands of practitioners who are engaged worldwide in the pursuit of tribology-based science and technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信