Andrew M. Glazer, Daniel R. Tabet, Victoria N. Parikh, Brett M. Kroncke, Atina G. Cote, Yuta Yamamoto, Qianru Wang, Ayesha Muhammad, Megan C. Lancaster, Matthew J. O’Neill, Jochen Weile, Tao Yang, Calum A. Macrae, Euan A. Ashley, Frederick P. Roth, Dan M. Roden
{"title":"Creating an atlas of variant effects to resolve variants of uncertain significance and guide cardiovascular medicine","authors":"Andrew M. Glazer, Daniel R. Tabet, Victoria N. Parikh, Brett M. Kroncke, Atina G. Cote, Yuta Yamamoto, Qianru Wang, Ayesha Muhammad, Megan C. Lancaster, Matthew J. O’Neill, Jochen Weile, Tao Yang, Calum A. Macrae, Euan A. Ashley, Frederick P. Roth, Dan M. Roden","doi":"10.1038/s41569-025-01201-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Cardiovascular diseases are leading global causes of death and disability, often presenting as interrelated phenotypes of atherosclerotic vascular disease, heart failure and arrhythmias. Cardiovascular diseases arise from interactions between environmental factors and predisposing genotypes and include common Mendelian lipid disorders, cardiomyopathies and arrhythmia syndromes. The identification of a pathogenic variant through genetic testing can inform disease diagnosis, risk prediction, treatment and family screening. However, a major roadblock in genomic medicine is that for many variants, especially missense variants, we lack sufficient evidence to enable a definitive classification, and therefore these variants are deemed as ‘variants of uncertain significance’. In this Review, we describe how multiplexed assays of variant effects can enable the functional assessment of nearly all coding variants in a target sequence, potentially offering a proactive approach to identifying the functional significance of gene variants that are observed later in a patient. We discuss validation, including the role of in silico variant effect predictors, and how multiplexed experimental methods are informing cardiovascular disease biology and ultimately resolving the problem of variants of uncertain significance at scale.</p>","PeriodicalId":18976,"journal":{"name":"Nature Reviews Cardiology","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":44.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Reviews Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41569-025-01201-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases are leading global causes of death and disability, often presenting as interrelated phenotypes of atherosclerotic vascular disease, heart failure and arrhythmias. Cardiovascular diseases arise from interactions between environmental factors and predisposing genotypes and include common Mendelian lipid disorders, cardiomyopathies and arrhythmia syndromes. The identification of a pathogenic variant through genetic testing can inform disease diagnosis, risk prediction, treatment and family screening. However, a major roadblock in genomic medicine is that for many variants, especially missense variants, we lack sufficient evidence to enable a definitive classification, and therefore these variants are deemed as ‘variants of uncertain significance’. In this Review, we describe how multiplexed assays of variant effects can enable the functional assessment of nearly all coding variants in a target sequence, potentially offering a proactive approach to identifying the functional significance of gene variants that are observed later in a patient. We discuss validation, including the role of in silico variant effect predictors, and how multiplexed experimental methods are informing cardiovascular disease biology and ultimately resolving the problem of variants of uncertain significance at scale.
期刊介绍:
Nature Reviews Cardiology aims to be the go-to source for reviews and commentaries in the scientific and clinical communities it serves. Focused on providing authoritative and accessible articles enriched with clear figures and tables, the journal strives to offer unparalleled service to authors, referees, and readers, maximizing the usefulness and impact of each publication. It covers a broad range of content types, including Research Highlights, Comments, News & Views, Reviews, Consensus Statements, and Perspectives, catering to practising cardiologists and cardiovascular research scientists. Authored by renowned clinicians, academics, and researchers, the content targets readers in the biological and medical sciences, ensuring accessibility across various disciplines. In-depth Reviews offer up-to-date information, while Consensus Statements provide evidence-based recommendations. Perspectives and News & Views present topical discussions and opinions, and the Research Highlights section filters primary research from cardiovascular and general medical journals. As part of the Nature Reviews portfolio, Nature Reviews Cardiology maintains high standards and a wide reach.