Creating an atlas of variant effects to resolve variants of uncertain significance and guide cardiovascular medicine

IF 44.2 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Andrew M. Glazer, Daniel R. Tabet, Victoria N. Parikh, Brett M. Kroncke, Atina G. Cote, Yuta Yamamoto, Qianru Wang, Ayesha Muhammad, Megan C. Lancaster, Matthew J. O’Neill, Jochen Weile, Tao Yang, Calum A. Macrae, Euan A. Ashley, Frederick P. Roth, Dan M. Roden
{"title":"Creating an atlas of variant effects to resolve variants of uncertain significance and guide cardiovascular medicine","authors":"Andrew M. Glazer, Daniel R. Tabet, Victoria N. Parikh, Brett M. Kroncke, Atina G. Cote, Yuta Yamamoto, Qianru Wang, Ayesha Muhammad, Megan C. Lancaster, Matthew J. O’Neill, Jochen Weile, Tao Yang, Calum A. Macrae, Euan A. Ashley, Frederick P. Roth, Dan M. Roden","doi":"10.1038/s41569-025-01201-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Cardiovascular diseases are leading global causes of death and disability, often presenting as interrelated phenotypes of atherosclerotic vascular disease, heart failure and arrhythmias. Cardiovascular diseases arise from interactions between environmental factors and predisposing genotypes and include common Mendelian lipid disorders, cardiomyopathies and arrhythmia syndromes. The identification of a pathogenic variant through genetic testing can inform disease diagnosis, risk prediction, treatment and family screening. However, a major roadblock in genomic medicine is that for many variants, especially missense variants, we lack sufficient evidence to enable a definitive classification, and therefore these variants are deemed as ‘variants of uncertain significance’. In this Review, we describe how multiplexed assays of variant effects can enable the functional assessment of nearly all coding variants in a target sequence, potentially offering a proactive approach to identifying the functional significance of gene variants that are observed later in a patient. We discuss validation, including the role of in silico variant effect predictors, and how multiplexed experimental methods are informing cardiovascular disease biology and ultimately resolving the problem of variants of uncertain significance at scale.</p>","PeriodicalId":18976,"journal":{"name":"Nature Reviews Cardiology","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":44.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Reviews Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41569-025-01201-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cardiovascular diseases are leading global causes of death and disability, often presenting as interrelated phenotypes of atherosclerotic vascular disease, heart failure and arrhythmias. Cardiovascular diseases arise from interactions between environmental factors and predisposing genotypes and include common Mendelian lipid disorders, cardiomyopathies and arrhythmia syndromes. The identification of a pathogenic variant through genetic testing can inform disease diagnosis, risk prediction, treatment and family screening. However, a major roadblock in genomic medicine is that for many variants, especially missense variants, we lack sufficient evidence to enable a definitive classification, and therefore these variants are deemed as ‘variants of uncertain significance’. In this Review, we describe how multiplexed assays of variant effects can enable the functional assessment of nearly all coding variants in a target sequence, potentially offering a proactive approach to identifying the functional significance of gene variants that are observed later in a patient. We discuss validation, including the role of in silico variant effect predictors, and how multiplexed experimental methods are informing cardiovascular disease biology and ultimately resolving the problem of variants of uncertain significance at scale.

Abstract Image

创建变异效应图谱,解决意义不确定的变异,指导心血管医学
心血管疾病是全球主要的死亡和残疾原因,通常表现为动脉粥样硬化性血管疾病、心力衰竭和心律失常的相关表型。心血管疾病源于环境因素和易感基因型之间的相互作用,包括常见的孟德尔脂质紊乱、心肌病和心律失常综合征。通过基因检测识别致病变异可以为疾病诊断、风险预测、治疗和家庭筛查提供信息。然而,基因组医学的一个主要障碍是,对于许多变异,特别是错义变异,我们缺乏足够的证据来进行明确的分类,因此这些变异被认为是“不确定意义的变异”。在这篇综述中,我们描述了变异效应的多重分析如何能够对目标序列中几乎所有的编码变异进行功能评估,潜在地提供了一种主动的方法来识别患者随后观察到的基因变异的功能意义。我们讨论了验证,包括计算机变异效应预测因子的作用,以及多重实验方法如何为心血管疾病生物学提供信息,并最终在规模上解决不确定意义的变异问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nature Reviews Cardiology
Nature Reviews Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
53.10
自引率
0.60%
发文量
143
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nature Reviews Cardiology aims to be the go-to source for reviews and commentaries in the scientific and clinical communities it serves. Focused on providing authoritative and accessible articles enriched with clear figures and tables, the journal strives to offer unparalleled service to authors, referees, and readers, maximizing the usefulness and impact of each publication. It covers a broad range of content types, including Research Highlights, Comments, News & Views, Reviews, Consensus Statements, and Perspectives, catering to practising cardiologists and cardiovascular research scientists. Authored by renowned clinicians, academics, and researchers, the content targets readers in the biological and medical sciences, ensuring accessibility across various disciplines. In-depth Reviews offer up-to-date information, while Consensus Statements provide evidence-based recommendations. Perspectives and News & Views present topical discussions and opinions, and the Research Highlights section filters primary research from cardiovascular and general medical journals. As part of the Nature Reviews portfolio, Nature Reviews Cardiology maintains high standards and a wide reach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信