Ana Beatriz Afonso, Carolina Morais da Silva, Paulo Nogueira, Mariana Verdelho Machado
{"title":"Meta-Analysis: Comparison of Living Versus Deceased Liver Transplantation for Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis","authors":"Ana Beatriz Afonso, Carolina Morais da Silva, Paulo Nogueira, Mariana Verdelho Machado","doi":"10.1111/apt.70357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\n \n <p>Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a rare disease that paradoxically accounts for 5%–15% of liver transplants (LT). The paucity of liver donors is boosting living donor LT (LDLT). We reviewed the literature regarding outcomes of LT in PSC, comparing LDLT with deceased donor LT (DDLT).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed through a search on: PubMed, Web-of-Science, Scopus and Cochrane Central, from inception to December 2024. In total, 22 studies were included, enrolling 22,024 patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Compared with LDLT, DDLT was associated with lower 1- (93.80% [95% CI 93.29–94.31] vs. 95.78% [95% CI 94.68–96.88]), 3- (88.81% [95% CI 88.14–89.48] vs. 93.23% [95% CI 91.85–94.61]) and 5-year survival (85.18% [95% CI 84.43–85.92] vs. 91.54% [95% CI 91.01–93.07]), although it had no impact on graft survival. DDLT was associated with a higher risk of post-LT sepsis (OR 3.68 [95% CI 1.02–13.26]), acute rejection (OR 1.75 [95% CI 1.12–2.73]) and PSC recurrence (OR 1.63 [95% CI 1.10–2.42]), but a lower risk of biliary complications (OR 0.29 [95% CI 0.11–0.78]). DDLT recipients were older (MD 4.26 years [95% CI 2.42–6.10]), with higher metabolic dysfunction, more advanced liver disease (higher MELD: MD 6.63 [95% CI 5.56–7.70]), but lower chances of having inflammatory bowel disease (OR 0.66 [95% CI 0.50–0.87]) or cholangiocarcinoma (OR 0.70 [95% CI 0.53–0.92]). DDLT donors were older (MD 2.46 years [95% CI 0.76–4.15]) and cold ischemia time was longer (MD 5.63 h [95% CI 3.18–8.08]).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>In PSC, LDLT seems to be associated with higher post-LT survival, compared with DDLT. This could be explained by earlier referral to LT with lower liver disease burden and better performance status; better graft quality; and shorter cold ischaemia time. PSC patients requiring LT should be encouraged to consider LDLT.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":121,"journal":{"name":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":"62 8","pages":"768-787"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apt.70357","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and Aims
Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a rare disease that paradoxically accounts for 5%–15% of liver transplants (LT). The paucity of liver donors is boosting living donor LT (LDLT). We reviewed the literature regarding outcomes of LT in PSC, comparing LDLT with deceased donor LT (DDLT).
Methods
A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed through a search on: PubMed, Web-of-Science, Scopus and Cochrane Central, from inception to December 2024. In total, 22 studies were included, enrolling 22,024 patients.
Results
Compared with LDLT, DDLT was associated with lower 1- (93.80% [95% CI 93.29–94.31] vs. 95.78% [95% CI 94.68–96.88]), 3- (88.81% [95% CI 88.14–89.48] vs. 93.23% [95% CI 91.85–94.61]) and 5-year survival (85.18% [95% CI 84.43–85.92] vs. 91.54% [95% CI 91.01–93.07]), although it had no impact on graft survival. DDLT was associated with a higher risk of post-LT sepsis (OR 3.68 [95% CI 1.02–13.26]), acute rejection (OR 1.75 [95% CI 1.12–2.73]) and PSC recurrence (OR 1.63 [95% CI 1.10–2.42]), but a lower risk of biliary complications (OR 0.29 [95% CI 0.11–0.78]). DDLT recipients were older (MD 4.26 years [95% CI 2.42–6.10]), with higher metabolic dysfunction, more advanced liver disease (higher MELD: MD 6.63 [95% CI 5.56–7.70]), but lower chances of having inflammatory bowel disease (OR 0.66 [95% CI 0.50–0.87]) or cholangiocarcinoma (OR 0.70 [95% CI 0.53–0.92]). DDLT donors were older (MD 2.46 years [95% CI 0.76–4.15]) and cold ischemia time was longer (MD 5.63 h [95% CI 3.18–8.08]).
Conclusion
In PSC, LDLT seems to be associated with higher post-LT survival, compared with DDLT. This could be explained by earlier referral to LT with lower liver disease burden and better performance status; better graft quality; and shorter cold ischaemia time. PSC patients requiring LT should be encouraged to consider LDLT.
背景和目的原发性硬化性胆管炎(PSC)是一种罕见的疾病,仅占肝移植(LT)的5%-15%。肝供体的缺乏促进了活体肝移植(LDLT)的发展。我们回顾了关于PSC中肝移植结果的文献,比较了LDLT和已故供者肝移植(DDLT)。方法通过检索PubMed、Web - of - Science、Scopus和Cochrane Central,从成立到2024年12月进行系统评价和meta分析。总共纳入22项研究,纳入22,024名患者。结果与LDLT相比,DDLT与较低的1‐(93.80% [95% CI 93.29-94.31]比95.78% [95% CI 94.68-96.88])、3‐(88.81% [95% CI 88.14-89.48]比93.23% [95% CI 91.85-94.61])和5‐年生存率(85.18% [95% CI 84.43-85.92]比91.54% [95% CI 91.01-93.07])相关,尽管它对移植物存活没有影响。DDLT与LT后脓毒症(OR 3.68 [95% CI 1.02-13.26])、急性排斥反应(OR 1.75 [95% CI 1.12-2.73])和PSC复发(OR 1.63 [95% CI 1.10-2.42])的高风险相关,但胆道并发症的风险较低(OR 0.29 [95% CI 0.11-0.78])。DDLT受者年龄较大(MD为4.26岁[95% CI 2.42-6.10]),代谢功能障碍较高,肝脏疾病更严重(MELD较高:MD为6.63 [95% CI 5.56-7.70]),但患炎症性肠病(OR为0.66 [95% CI 0.50-0.87])或胆管癌(OR为0.70 [95% CI 0.53-0.92])的几率较低。DDLT供者年龄较大(MD 2.46岁[95% CI 0.76-4.15]),冷缺血时间较长(MD 5.63 h [95% CI 3.18-8.08])。结论:在PSC中,与DDLT相比,LDLT似乎与更高的LT后生存率相关。这可以解释为早期转诊到肝移植,肝脏疾病负担较低,运动状态较好;接枝质量好;冷缺血时间短。应鼓励需要肝移植的PSC患者考虑肝移植。
期刊介绍:
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics is a global pharmacology journal focused on the impact of drugs on the human gastrointestinal and hepato-biliary systems. It covers a diverse range of topics, often with immediate clinical relevance to its readership.