The Interplay of Public Administration and Community Resilience During the COVID-19 Pandemic—A Rapid Scoping Review

IF 1.1 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Daniela Gröschke
{"title":"The Interplay of Public Administration and Community Resilience During the COVID-19 Pandemic—A Rapid Scoping Review","authors":"Daniela Gröschke","doi":"10.1002/crq.21480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This rapid scoping review examines the interplay between public administration and community resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on the type of research conducted, emerging themes in resilience studies, and key lessons learned. The findings show that research in the Global North has primarily examined resilience at the city level, while studies in the Global South have focused on vulnerable populations. Mechanisms of resilience are shaped by factors that increase community vulnerability (environmental, structural, and socio-cultural factors), key drivers of resilience (digital and technological innovation, adaptive capacity), and their respective influence on resilience strategies (including community-centered initiatives and multi-level, cross-sectoral collaboration). Together, these elements contribute to different resilience outcomes (persistence, adaptation, or transformation). Overall, strong public administrations were found to enhance community resilience, while limited access to public services increased vulnerability, particularly in marginalized communities, and reduced capacity for resilience. However, research on public administration resilience, particularly in the Global South, and on the role of social conflict in resilience processes remains limited. Directions for future research are outlined.</p>","PeriodicalId":39736,"journal":{"name":"Conflict Resolution Quarterly","volume":"43 1","pages":"133-157"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/crq.21480","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conflict Resolution Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/crq.21480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This rapid scoping review examines the interplay between public administration and community resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on the type of research conducted, emerging themes in resilience studies, and key lessons learned. The findings show that research in the Global North has primarily examined resilience at the city level, while studies in the Global South have focused on vulnerable populations. Mechanisms of resilience are shaped by factors that increase community vulnerability (environmental, structural, and socio-cultural factors), key drivers of resilience (digital and technological innovation, adaptive capacity), and their respective influence on resilience strategies (including community-centered initiatives and multi-level, cross-sectoral collaboration). Together, these elements contribute to different resilience outcomes (persistence, adaptation, or transformation). Overall, strong public administrations were found to enhance community resilience, while limited access to public services increased vulnerability, particularly in marginalized communities, and reduced capacity for resilience. However, research on public administration resilience, particularly in the Global South, and on the role of social conflict in resilience processes remains limited. Directions for future research are outlined.

Abstract Image

2019冠状病毒病大流行期间公共行政和社区复原力的相互作用——快速范围审查
本快速范围审查审查了2019冠状病毒病大流行期间公共行政与社区复原力之间的相互作用,重点关注所开展的研究类型、复原力研究中的新主题以及吸取的主要经验教训。研究结果表明,全球北方的研究主要考察了城市层面的复原力,而全球南方的研究则侧重于弱势群体。复原力机制由增加社区脆弱性的因素(环境、结构和社会文化因素)、复原力的关键驱动因素(数字和技术创新、适应能力)及其各自对复原力战略的影响(包括以社区为中心的举措和多层次、跨部门合作)形成。这些因素共同促成了不同的弹性结果(持久性、适应性或转换)。总体而言,强有力的公共行政可以增强社区的复原力,而获得公共服务的机会有限则增加了脆弱性,特别是在边缘化社区,并降低了复原力。然而,关于公共行政弹性的研究,特别是在全球南方,以及关于社会冲突在弹性过程中的作用的研究仍然有限。展望了今后的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Conflict Resolution Quarterly
Conflict Resolution Quarterly Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Conflict Resolution Quarterly publishes quality scholarship on relationships between theory, research, and practice in the conflict management and dispute resolution field to promote more effective professional applications. A defining focus of the journal is the relationships among theory, research, and practice. Articles address the implications of theory for practice and research directions, how research can better inform practice, and how research can contribute to theory development with important implications for practice. Articles also focus on all aspects of the conflict resolution process and context with primary focus on the behavior, role, and impact of third parties in effectively handling conflict.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信