{"title":"A model of theft and bribery","authors":"Desiree A. Desierto","doi":"10.1111/ecca.70003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Two of the most pervasive kinds of public corruption are theft and bribery. I show how a simple common agency model can simultaneously depict both. In one setting, a public official (agent) who has discretion over government revenues can steal some of it and allocate the rest to public spending towards various sectors (principals), some of whom can pay bribes in exchange. I find that there is a threshold level of revenues at and below which the official obtains bribes but does not steal revenues. She only starts stealing revenues above the threshold. In another setting, there are two political candidates (agents), each promising to allocate public spending to various groups of voters (principals), some of whom can pay bribes in exchange. Each candidate then uses the bribes and any government revenues that she expects to steal in office to buy some votes. I find that the candidate who would steal less revenues in office will obtain larger bribes, and vice versa, which suggests that bribe money and stolen revenues are substitute sources of (illicit) campaign funds.</p>","PeriodicalId":48040,"journal":{"name":"Economica","volume":"92 368","pages":"1247-1271"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ecca.70003","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economica","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecca.70003","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Two of the most pervasive kinds of public corruption are theft and bribery. I show how a simple common agency model can simultaneously depict both. In one setting, a public official (agent) who has discretion over government revenues can steal some of it and allocate the rest to public spending towards various sectors (principals), some of whom can pay bribes in exchange. I find that there is a threshold level of revenues at and below which the official obtains bribes but does not steal revenues. She only starts stealing revenues above the threshold. In another setting, there are two political candidates (agents), each promising to allocate public spending to various groups of voters (principals), some of whom can pay bribes in exchange. Each candidate then uses the bribes and any government revenues that she expects to steal in office to buy some votes. I find that the candidate who would steal less revenues in office will obtain larger bribes, and vice versa, which suggests that bribe money and stolen revenues are substitute sources of (illicit) campaign funds.
期刊介绍:
Economica is an international journal devoted to research in all branches of economics. Theoretical and empirical articles are welcome from all parts of the international research community. Economica is a leading economics journal, appearing high in the published citation rankings. In addition to the main papers which make up each issue, there is an extensive review section, covering a wide range of recently published titles at all levels.