How do neoliberals vote? Power-based asymmetries in hierarchy-enhancement

IF 1.8 4区 社会学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Tristan G. Martin, Harrison J. Schmitt, Tyler Jimenez
{"title":"How do neoliberals vote? Power-based asymmetries in hierarchy-enhancement","authors":"Tristan G. Martin,&nbsp;Harrison J. Schmitt,&nbsp;Tyler Jimenez","doi":"10.1111/asap.70029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Neoliberal ideology has received increasing empirical attention in recent years, although little is known about its relationship to voting behavior. Examining this question may offer insight into theoretical questions regarding social hierarchies and neoliberalism. Following from social dominance theory, we posit that social dominance orientation should predict neoliberal ideology, which should, in turn, predict voting for a Republican candidate. However, building from the ideological asymmetry hypothesis, we posit that these relationships should be stronger among high (vs. low) power groups. One study (<i>N</i> = 604) is designed to test these hypothesized relationships between social dominance orientation, neoliberal ideology, and voting intentions among high- and low-power groups using a series of moderated-mediation models in the context of the 2024 US Presidential election. A nationally representative sample (based on race, gender, age, and political affiliation) of registered voters was recruited from Prolific to complete a brief survey in the weeks leading up to the election.</p>","PeriodicalId":46799,"journal":{"name":"Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy","volume":"25 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://spssi.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/asap.70029","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Neoliberal ideology has received increasing empirical attention in recent years, although little is known about its relationship to voting behavior. Examining this question may offer insight into theoretical questions regarding social hierarchies and neoliberalism. Following from social dominance theory, we posit that social dominance orientation should predict neoliberal ideology, which should, in turn, predict voting for a Republican candidate. However, building from the ideological asymmetry hypothesis, we posit that these relationships should be stronger among high (vs. low) power groups. One study (N = 604) is designed to test these hypothesized relationships between social dominance orientation, neoliberal ideology, and voting intentions among high- and low-power groups using a series of moderated-mediation models in the context of the 2024 US Presidential election. A nationally representative sample (based on race, gender, age, and political affiliation) of registered voters was recruited from Prolific to complete a brief survey in the weeks leading up to the election.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

新自由主义者如何投票?层级强化中基于权力的不对称
近年来,新自由主义意识形态受到了越来越多的实证关注,尽管人们对其与投票行为的关系知之甚少。研究这个问题可能会对有关社会等级和新自由主义的理论问题提供见解。根据社会支配理论,我们假设社会支配取向应该预测新自由主义意识形态,而新自由主义意识形态反过来又应该预测共和党候选人的投票。然而,根据意识形态不对称假说,我们假设这些关系应该在高(相对于低)权力群体中更强。其中一项研究(N = 604)旨在以2024年美国总统大选为背景,使用一系列适度中介模型来测试高权力群体和低权力群体中社会支配取向、新自由主义意识形态和投票意向之间的假设关系。在选举前的几周内,从多产州招募了一个具有全国代表性的登记选民样本(基于种族、性别、年龄和政治派别)来完成一项简短的调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Recent articles in ASAP have examined social psychological methods in the study of economic and social justice including ageism, heterosexism, racism, sexism, status quo bias and other forms of discrimination, social problems such as climate change, extremism, homelessness, inter-group conflict, natural disasters, poverty, and terrorism, and social ideals such as democracy, empowerment, equality, health, and trust.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信