Patient experiences of occupational formulation: It's about getting to know me

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Lorrae Mynard, Ellie Fossey, Louise Farnworth, Genevieve Pepin
{"title":"Patient experiences of occupational formulation: It's about getting to know me","authors":"Lorrae Mynard,&nbsp;Ellie Fossey,&nbsp;Louise Farnworth,&nbsp;Genevieve Pepin","doi":"10.1111/1440-1630.70047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Occupational formulation is a synthesis of assessment information that describes a person's occupational participation and needs, to guide collaborative goal and therapy planning. This study aimed to explore patients' experiences of creating occupational formulations and reflecting on them in an Australian secure forensic hospital.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>This qualitative descriptive study is part of a larger participatory action research project aiming to implement occupational formulation and evaluate its use within a forensic occupational therapy service. An occupational therapist researcher and lived experience worker co-interviewed patients who had completed an occupational formulation. A semi-structured interview guide and chart stimulated recall were used to support discussion with each participant about their occupational formulation. The audio-recorded interviews were transcribed, and reflexive thematic analysis was conducted.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Consumer and community involvement</h3>\n \n <p>Extensive consultation with members of the lived experience, occupational therapy and social work teams, and the hospital's consumer advisory group informed the design and implementation of this study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Ten forensic patients, including nine male and one female (aged 30s–60s) from four units, participated in interviews. Three themes were developed. The first, “a getting-to-know-you piece,” describes how participants viewed the occupational formulation and the process of developing it. The second, “talking about losses and limitations” reflects the challenges within the forensic system that participants highlighted through creating and reading their occupational formulations, while the third, “valuing its potential” depicts how the occupational formulations were used and could potentially be used.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Overall, participants viewed occupational formulation positively and valued being heard and understood. The approach benefited patients and the therapeutic relationship, supporting collaboration and potentially shifting power within the patient-therapist relationship. The study also identified missed opportunities to support further reflection and collaborative progress review. Suggestions were made for strengthening the development, documentation, and review of occupational formulations and goals.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY</h3>\n \n <p>Occupational therapists try to learn about people's daily lives to understand what matters to each person and set therapy goals together. One way they do this is through a process called an <i>occupational formulation</i>. This is a written summary made with the person to show what they need and want in their life. This study looked at how patients felt about using occupational formulation in a secure forensic hospital. This is a new way of working, so we wanted to learn more about how it was used and what patients thought about it.</p>\n \n <p>The study was planned with help from people with lived experience, occupational therapists, social workers, and the hospital's Consumer Advisory Group. An occupational therapist and a lived experience worker interviewed 10 patients about their occupational formulations. The interviews were recorded and written down. Researchers then looked at what the patients said to find common ideas.</p>\n \n <p>Three themes were identified: getting to know the person, talking about losses and limitations, and how the formulation helped or could be helpful. Most patients said the process was helpful. It made it easier to work with their occupational therapist and talk about what was important to them. They also wanted more chances to check in on their goals.</p>\n \n <p>Based on what we learned, we made suggestions to help therapists improve how they create and review occupational formulations with patients. More research could look at how this works in other places.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55418,"journal":{"name":"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal","volume":"72 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1440-1630.70047","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1440-1630.70047","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Occupational formulation is a synthesis of assessment information that describes a person's occupational participation and needs, to guide collaborative goal and therapy planning. This study aimed to explore patients' experiences of creating occupational formulations and reflecting on them in an Australian secure forensic hospital.

Method

This qualitative descriptive study is part of a larger participatory action research project aiming to implement occupational formulation and evaluate its use within a forensic occupational therapy service. An occupational therapist researcher and lived experience worker co-interviewed patients who had completed an occupational formulation. A semi-structured interview guide and chart stimulated recall were used to support discussion with each participant about their occupational formulation. The audio-recorded interviews were transcribed, and reflexive thematic analysis was conducted.

Consumer and community involvement

Extensive consultation with members of the lived experience, occupational therapy and social work teams, and the hospital's consumer advisory group informed the design and implementation of this study.

Findings

Ten forensic patients, including nine male and one female (aged 30s–60s) from four units, participated in interviews. Three themes were developed. The first, “a getting-to-know-you piece,” describes how participants viewed the occupational formulation and the process of developing it. The second, “talking about losses and limitations” reflects the challenges within the forensic system that participants highlighted through creating and reading their occupational formulations, while the third, “valuing its potential” depicts how the occupational formulations were used and could potentially be used.

Conclusion

Overall, participants viewed occupational formulation positively and valued being heard and understood. The approach benefited patients and the therapeutic relationship, supporting collaboration and potentially shifting power within the patient-therapist relationship. The study also identified missed opportunities to support further reflection and collaborative progress review. Suggestions were made for strengthening the development, documentation, and review of occupational formulations and goals.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

Occupational therapists try to learn about people's daily lives to understand what matters to each person and set therapy goals together. One way they do this is through a process called an occupational formulation. This is a written summary made with the person to show what they need and want in their life. This study looked at how patients felt about using occupational formulation in a secure forensic hospital. This is a new way of working, so we wanted to learn more about how it was used and what patients thought about it.

The study was planned with help from people with lived experience, occupational therapists, social workers, and the hospital's Consumer Advisory Group. An occupational therapist and a lived experience worker interviewed 10 patients about their occupational formulations. The interviews were recorded and written down. Researchers then looked at what the patients said to find common ideas.

Three themes were identified: getting to know the person, talking about losses and limitations, and how the formulation helped or could be helpful. Most patients said the process was helpful. It made it easier to work with their occupational therapist and talk about what was important to them. They also wanted more chances to check in on their goals.

Based on what we learned, we made suggestions to help therapists improve how they create and review occupational formulations with patients. More research could look at how this works in other places.

职业配方的患者体验:这是为了了解我
职业规划是描述个人职业参与和需求的综合评估信息,用于指导合作目标和治疗计划。本研究旨在探讨患者的经验,创造职业配方和反思他们在澳大利亚安全法医医院。该定性描述性研究是一个更大的参与性行动研究项目的一部分,旨在实施职业配方并评估其在法医职业治疗服务中的使用。一位职业治疗师研究员和生活体验工作者共同采访了完成职业配方的患者。半结构化的访谈指南和图表刺激回忆被用来支持与每个参与者讨论他们的职业规划。对访谈录音进行转录,并进行反身性专题分析。消费者和社区参与与生活经验、职业治疗和社会工作团队以及医院消费者咨询小组的成员进行了广泛的咨询,为本研究的设计和实施提供了信息。结果来自4个单位的10名法医患者参加了访谈,其中男9名,女1名,年龄30 ~ 60岁。会议发展了三个主题。第一部分是“了解你”,描述了参与者如何看待职业规划及其发展过程。第二,“谈论损失和限制”反映了参与者通过创建和阅读他们的职业公式强调的法医系统中的挑战,而第三,“评估其潜力”描述了如何使用和可能使用职业公式。结论总体而言,参与者对职业表述持积极态度,重视被倾听和被理解。这种方法使患者和治疗关系受益,支持合作,并可能在患者-治疗师关系中转移权力。该研究还确定了错过的机会,以支持进一步的反思和协作进展审查。提出了加强职业提法和目标的制定、记录和审查的建议。职业治疗师试图了解人们的日常生活,了解对每个人来说重要的是什么,并共同设定治疗目标。他们这样做的一种方法是通过一个叫做职业公式的过程。这是一份书面总结,表明他们在生活中需要什么和想要什么。这项研究观察了病人在安全的法医医院使用职业配方的感受。这是一种新的工作方式,所以我们想更多地了解它是如何使用的,以及患者对它的看法。这项研究是在有生活经验的人、职业治疗师、社会工作者和医院的消费者咨询小组的帮助下计划的。一位职业治疗师和一位生活体验工作者就他们的职业配方采访了10位患者。采访被记录下来并写了下来。然后,研究人员通过观察患者所说的话来寻找共同点。他们确定了三个主题:了解这个人,谈论损失和限制,以及这种表述如何有帮助或可能有帮助。大多数病人说这个过程很有帮助。这让他们更容易与职业治疗师合作,谈论对他们来说重要的事情。他们还希望有更多的机会来检查自己的目标。基于我们所学到的,我们提出了一些建议,以帮助治疗师改进他们如何与患者一起创建和审查职业配方。更多的研究可以看看这在其他地方是如何起作用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian Occupational Therapy Journal is a leading international peer reviewed publication presenting influential, high quality innovative scholarship and research relevant to occupational therapy. The aim of the journal is to be a leader in the dissemination of scholarship and evidence to substantiate, influence and shape policy and occupational therapy practice locally and globally. The journal publishes empirical studies, theoretical papers, and reviews. Preference will be given to manuscripts that have a sound theoretical basis, methodological rigour with sufficient scope and scale to make important new contributions to the occupational therapy body of knowledge. AOTJ does not publish protocols for any study design The journal will consider multidisciplinary or interprofessional studies that include occupational therapy, occupational therapists or occupational therapy students, so long as ‘key points’ highlight the specific implications for occupational therapy, occupational therapists and/or occupational therapy students and/or consumers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信