Public Spending and Water Scarcity: An Empirical Analysis of USBR Investments in the Colorado River Basin

IF 2.2 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Paloma Avila, Mehdi Nemati, Daniel Crespo, Ariel Dinar, Zachary Frankel, Nicholas Halberg
{"title":"Public Spending and Water Scarcity: An Empirical Analysis of USBR Investments in the Colorado River Basin","authors":"Paloma Avila,&nbsp;Mehdi Nemati,&nbsp;Daniel Crespo,&nbsp;Ariel Dinar,&nbsp;Zachary Frankel,&nbsp;Nicholas Halberg","doi":"10.1111/1752-1688.70042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Rigid historical agreements, rapid population growth, and the accelerating impacts of climate change have significantly increased the complexity of water management and importance of water in the Colorado River Basin, leading to persistent and at times severe water supply shortages. Various policy interventions aim to address this challenge, with federal government funding for supply and demand management being a key component, as seen in initiatives such as compensated conservation programs. Utilizing data from the US Bureau of Reclamation, a primary source of funding for the basin water efficiency and management, we analyze the distribution of these funds, ex-ante estimated water savings, and estimate the cost of water saved. Our analysis covers 462 projects across 10 programs from 2004 to 2024, spanning over 200 locations across the seven states that share the Basin water. The total funding for these efficiency programs amounts to approximately $1.08 billion (2023 constant dollars). Our analysis indicates that approximately 81% of the funds are allocated to projects aimed at reducing water demand, and about 19% are allocated to projects that augment water supply. In terms of geographic distribution, 5.7% of funds went to the Upper Basin states, 75.5% to the Lower Basin states, and 18.8% to Tribal areas. Across all projects, the estimated cost of water saved ranged widely, from approximately $385 to $2444 per acre-foot saved.</p>","PeriodicalId":17234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The American Water Resources Association","volume":"61 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1752-1688.70042","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The American Water Resources Association","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1752-1688.70042","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rigid historical agreements, rapid population growth, and the accelerating impacts of climate change have significantly increased the complexity of water management and importance of water in the Colorado River Basin, leading to persistent and at times severe water supply shortages. Various policy interventions aim to address this challenge, with federal government funding for supply and demand management being a key component, as seen in initiatives such as compensated conservation programs. Utilizing data from the US Bureau of Reclamation, a primary source of funding for the basin water efficiency and management, we analyze the distribution of these funds, ex-ante estimated water savings, and estimate the cost of water saved. Our analysis covers 462 projects across 10 programs from 2004 to 2024, spanning over 200 locations across the seven states that share the Basin water. The total funding for these efficiency programs amounts to approximately $1.08 billion (2023 constant dollars). Our analysis indicates that approximately 81% of the funds are allocated to projects aimed at reducing water demand, and about 19% are allocated to projects that augment water supply. In terms of geographic distribution, 5.7% of funds went to the Upper Basin states, 75.5% to the Lower Basin states, and 18.8% to Tribal areas. Across all projects, the estimated cost of water saved ranged widely, from approximately $385 to $2444 per acre-foot saved.

Abstract Image

公共支出与水资源短缺:科罗拉多河流域USBR投资的实证分析
僵化的历史协议、快速的人口增长和气候变化的加速影响大大增加了科罗拉多河流域水管理的复杂性和水的重要性,导致了持续的、有时严重的供水短缺。各种政策干预旨在应对这一挑战,联邦政府为供需管理提供资金是一个关键组成部分,如补偿保护计划等举措。利用美国垦务局的数据,我们分析了这些资金的分配,预估的节水量,并估计了节水成本。美国垦务局是流域水资源效率和管理的主要资金来源。我们的分析涵盖了2004年至2024年10个项目中的462个项目,涵盖了共享流域水资源的7个州的200多个地点。这些能效项目的总资金总额约为10.8亿美元(按2023年不变美元计算)。我们的分析表明,大约81%的资金分配给了旨在减少水需求的项目,大约19%的资金分配给了增加水供应的项目。在地理分布方面,5.7%的资金流向盆地上游各州,75.5%流向盆地下游各州,18.8%流向部落地区。在所有项目中,节水的估计成本相差很大,从每英亩英尺节约约385美元到2444美元不等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of The American Water Resources Association
Journal of The American Water Resources Association 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
100
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: JAWRA seeks to be the preeminent scholarly publication on multidisciplinary water resources issues. JAWRA papers present ideas derived from multiple disciplines woven together to give insight into a critical water issue, or are based primarily upon a single discipline with important applications to other disciplines. Papers often cover the topics of recent AWRA conferences such as riparian ecology, geographic information systems, adaptive management, and water policy. JAWRA authors present work within their disciplinary fields to a broader audience. Our Associate Editors and reviewers reflect this diversity to ensure a knowledgeable and fair review of a broad range of topics. We particularly encourage submissions of papers which impart a ''take home message'' our readers can use.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信