An Analysis of Human Preference for Object Orientation in Mechanical Design Visualization

IF 2 Q3 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING
Yan-Ting Chen , Cheyn Rodriguez , Andrew Herbert , Rui Liu
{"title":"An Analysis of Human Preference for Object Orientation in Mechanical Design Visualization","authors":"Yan-Ting Chen ,&nbsp;Cheyn Rodriguez ,&nbsp;Andrew Herbert ,&nbsp;Rui Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.mfglet.2025.06.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Effective communication of new mechanical designs is critical during the conceptual design stage of product development and has a significant impact on how designers present their work. While 2D technical drawings are widely used to convey the 3D geometry of designs, critical factors of design visualization, such as view selection, including object orientation, rotation, and direction of view, are often overlooked. To enhance communication efficiency and reduce errors, it is essential to establish optimal criteria for presenting mechanical designs. This study explores human preferences for orienting mechanical components, focusing on two common approaches: functionality-based and stability-based orientations. To examine these preferences, two groups of participants with diverse academic backgrounds were tasked with selecting between these two orientations for a set of mechanical designs. Additionally, participants rated their familiarity with each object (on a scale from 0 to 3) to assess how familiarity influences orientation preferences. The findings aim to provide insights into the optimal presentation of mechanical designs, enhancing clarity and effectiveness in design communication. The experimental results reveal that participants with a higher level of familiarity with the design tend to prefer functionality-based orientations, while stability-based orientations are more frequently selected for less familiar designs. Additionally, academic background primarily influences participants’ familiarity with the designs but has minimal impact on their orientation preferences when familiarity is considered. These results provide valuable insights for optimizing the presentation of mechanical designs, enhancing clarity and communication effectiveness in design visualization. By understanding these preference patterns, this study offers practical implications for improving mechanical design communication. Tailoring visualization strategies based on familiarity levels can improve clarity and ensure that design intent is effectively communicated to different audiences. These findings provide a foundation for future research to optimize view selection in mechanical design visualization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38186,"journal":{"name":"Manufacturing Letters","volume":"44 ","pages":"Pages 205-213"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manufacturing Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213846325000513","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Effective communication of new mechanical designs is critical during the conceptual design stage of product development and has a significant impact on how designers present their work. While 2D technical drawings are widely used to convey the 3D geometry of designs, critical factors of design visualization, such as view selection, including object orientation, rotation, and direction of view, are often overlooked. To enhance communication efficiency and reduce errors, it is essential to establish optimal criteria for presenting mechanical designs. This study explores human preferences for orienting mechanical components, focusing on two common approaches: functionality-based and stability-based orientations. To examine these preferences, two groups of participants with diverse academic backgrounds were tasked with selecting between these two orientations for a set of mechanical designs. Additionally, participants rated their familiarity with each object (on a scale from 0 to 3) to assess how familiarity influences orientation preferences. The findings aim to provide insights into the optimal presentation of mechanical designs, enhancing clarity and effectiveness in design communication. The experimental results reveal that participants with a higher level of familiarity with the design tend to prefer functionality-based orientations, while stability-based orientations are more frequently selected for less familiar designs. Additionally, academic background primarily influences participants’ familiarity with the designs but has minimal impact on their orientation preferences when familiarity is considered. These results provide valuable insights for optimizing the presentation of mechanical designs, enhancing clarity and communication effectiveness in design visualization. By understanding these preference patterns, this study offers practical implications for improving mechanical design communication. Tailoring visualization strategies based on familiarity levels can improve clarity and ensure that design intent is effectively communicated to different audiences. These findings provide a foundation for future research to optimize view selection in mechanical design visualization.
机械设计可视化中人对对象取向的偏好分析
在产品开发的概念设计阶段,新机械设计的有效沟通是至关重要的,并且对设计师如何展示他们的工作有重大影响。虽然2D技术图纸被广泛用于传达设计的3D几何形状,但设计可视化的关键因素,如视图选择,包括对象方向,旋转和视图方向,往往被忽视。为了提高沟通效率,减少错误,建立机械设计的最佳呈现标准是至关重要的。本研究探讨了人类对机械部件定向的偏好,重点关注两种常见方法:基于功能的定向和基于稳定性的定向。为了检查这些偏好,两组具有不同学术背景的参与者被要求在这两种方向中选择一组机械设计。此外,参与者对每个物体的熟悉程度打分(从0到3),以评估熟悉程度如何影响取向偏好。研究结果旨在为机械设计的最佳呈现提供见解,提高设计沟通的清晰度和有效性。实验结果表明,对设计熟悉程度较高的参与者倾向于选择基于功能的方向,而对设计不熟悉的参与者更倾向于选择基于稳定性的方向。此外,学术背景主要影响参与者对设计的熟悉程度,但在考虑熟悉程度时,对他们的取向偏好的影响最小。这些结果为优化机械设计的呈现,提高设计可视化的清晰度和沟通效率提供了有价值的见解。通过了解这些偏好模式,本研究为改善机械设计沟通提供了实际意义。根据熟悉程度定制可视化策略可以提高清晰度,并确保将设计意图有效地传达给不同的受众。这些研究结果为机械设计可视化中优化视图选择的研究奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Manufacturing Letters
Manufacturing Letters Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.10%
发文量
192
审稿时长
60 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信