Infections resulting from wild land and aquatic species injuries: A case series from Mornington Peninsula, Australia

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Ishith Seth , Omar Shadid , Gianluca Marcaccini , Roberto Cuomo , Warren M. Rozen
{"title":"Infections resulting from wild land and aquatic species injuries: A case series from Mornington Peninsula, Australia","authors":"Ishith Seth ,&nbsp;Omar Shadid ,&nbsp;Gianluca Marcaccini ,&nbsp;Roberto Cuomo ,&nbsp;Warren M. Rozen","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2025.112715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Urban expansion into natural habitats has increased human interactions with wild terrestrial and aquatic species, leading to a rise in animal-related injuries. These incidents often result in complex infections, posing major public health challenges. This study examines the epidemiology, therapeutic interventions, and clinical outcomes of infections from non-domesticated animal injuries in the Mornington Peninsula, Australia.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study (February 2021–April 2024) evaluated medical records of patients presenting with injuries from wild species who subsequently developed infections. Selection criteria included only cases with confirmed infections determined by clinical assessment or positive microbial cultures. Injuries from domestic animals, insects, or humans were excluded. The analysis assessed timing of infection onset, microbial culture results, antibiotic sensitivity profiles, and postoperative trajectories.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 52 bites from non-domesticated animals were documented, with 23 % (12/52) being infected. Most were males with an average age of 43 years. Among the 12 infected cases, Staphylococcus aureus was isolated in 3/12 (25 %), β-haemolytic streptococci in 2/12 (17 %), Enterococcus faecalis in 1/12 (8 %), Pseudomonas aeruginosa in 1/12 (8 %), Prevotella bivia in 1/12 (8 %), and Vibrio vulnificus in 1/12 (8 %); mixed coliform growth was observed in 3/12 (25 %). Compared to typical dog and cat bites, usually caused by Pasteurella multocida, streptococci, staphylococci and anaerobes, our series revealed a higher presence of marine-associated pathogens such as Vibrio species and environmental Gram-negative bacilli. Management involved wound debridement with adjunctive medical therapy (7/12), delayed primary closure (3/12), and medical management alone (3/12). All patients received empirical broad-spectrum antibiotics, which were later adjusted based on culture results. Most isolates were pan-sensitive, except for Vibrio vulnificus (ciprofloxacin-sensitive, resistant to penicillins/cephalosporins) and penicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. All patients recovered without complications following comprehensive wound care and targeted antibiotic therapy. Notably, some marine-derived infections exhibited unique resistance patterns that required specific antimicrobial regimens.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The necessity for immediate comprehensive wound management and empirically guided antibiotic therapy, adjusted based on culture results, was essential for managing these complex infections. The data derived from this study provides essential insights into the microbial dynamics and clinical management of wild animal bite infections, emphasizing the need for individualized medical strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54978,"journal":{"name":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","volume":"56 11","pages":"Article 112715"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002013832500573X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Urban expansion into natural habitats has increased human interactions with wild terrestrial and aquatic species, leading to a rise in animal-related injuries. These incidents often result in complex infections, posing major public health challenges. This study examines the epidemiology, therapeutic interventions, and clinical outcomes of infections from non-domesticated animal injuries in the Mornington Peninsula, Australia.

Methods

This retrospective study (February 2021–April 2024) evaluated medical records of patients presenting with injuries from wild species who subsequently developed infections. Selection criteria included only cases with confirmed infections determined by clinical assessment or positive microbial cultures. Injuries from domestic animals, insects, or humans were excluded. The analysis assessed timing of infection onset, microbial culture results, antibiotic sensitivity profiles, and postoperative trajectories.

Results

A total of 52 bites from non-domesticated animals were documented, with 23 % (12/52) being infected. Most were males with an average age of 43 years. Among the 12 infected cases, Staphylococcus aureus was isolated in 3/12 (25 %), β-haemolytic streptococci in 2/12 (17 %), Enterococcus faecalis in 1/12 (8 %), Pseudomonas aeruginosa in 1/12 (8 %), Prevotella bivia in 1/12 (8 %), and Vibrio vulnificus in 1/12 (8 %); mixed coliform growth was observed in 3/12 (25 %). Compared to typical dog and cat bites, usually caused by Pasteurella multocida, streptococci, staphylococci and anaerobes, our series revealed a higher presence of marine-associated pathogens such as Vibrio species and environmental Gram-negative bacilli. Management involved wound debridement with adjunctive medical therapy (7/12), delayed primary closure (3/12), and medical management alone (3/12). All patients received empirical broad-spectrum antibiotics, which were later adjusted based on culture results. Most isolates were pan-sensitive, except for Vibrio vulnificus (ciprofloxacin-sensitive, resistant to penicillins/cephalosporins) and penicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. All patients recovered without complications following comprehensive wound care and targeted antibiotic therapy. Notably, some marine-derived infections exhibited unique resistance patterns that required specific antimicrobial regimens.

Conclusions

The necessity for immediate comprehensive wound management and empirically guided antibiotic therapy, adjusted based on culture results, was essential for managing these complex infections. The data derived from this study provides essential insights into the microbial dynamics and clinical management of wild animal bite infections, emphasizing the need for individualized medical strategies.
野生陆地和水生物种损伤引起的感染:澳大利亚莫宁顿半岛的病例系列
城市向自然栖息地的扩张增加了人类与野生陆生和水生物种的相互作用,导致动物相关伤害的增加。这些事件往往导致复杂的感染,对公共卫生构成重大挑战。本研究调查了澳大利亚莫宁顿半岛非驯养动物受伤感染的流行病学、治疗干预和临床结果。方法回顾性研究(2021年2月- 2024年4月)对野生物种损伤后发生感染的患者病历进行评估。选择标准仅包括经临床评估或微生物培养阳性确定的确诊感染病例。家畜、昆虫或人类造成的伤害被排除在外。分析评估了感染发生的时间、微生物培养结果、抗生素敏感性概况和术后轨迹。结果共报告非家养动物咬伤52例,其中23%(12/52)被感染。大多数是平均年龄为43岁的男性。在12例感染病例中,分离出金黄色葡萄球菌3/12(25%)、β溶血性链球菌2/12(17%)、粪肠球菌1/12(8%)、铜绿假单胞菌1/12(8%)、bivia普氏菌1/12(8%)、创伤弧菌1/12 (8%);3/12(25%)观察到混合大肠菌群生长。与通常由多杀性巴氏杆菌、链球菌、葡萄球菌和厌氧菌引起的典型狗和猫咬伤相比,我们的系列研究显示,与海洋相关的病原体如弧菌和环境革兰氏阴性杆菌的存在更高。处理方法包括伤口清创配合药物治疗(7/12)、延迟初次闭合(3/12)和单纯药物治疗(3/12)。所有患者均使用经验性广谱抗生素,随后根据培养结果进行调整。除创伤弧菌(对环丙沙星敏感,对青霉素/头孢菌素耐药)和耐青霉素金黄色葡萄球菌外,大多数菌株均为泛敏感。经过全面的伤口护理和靶向抗生素治疗,所有患者均无并发症。值得注意的是,一些海洋来源的感染表现出独特的耐药模式,需要特定的抗微生物方案。结论急诊综合创面处理和经验性抗生素治疗是处理这些复杂感染的必要条件,并根据培养结果进行调整。从这项研究中获得的数据为野生动物咬伤感染的微生物动力学和临床管理提供了重要的见解,强调了个性化医疗策略的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
699
审稿时长
96 days
期刊介绍: Injury was founded in 1969 and is an international journal dealing with all aspects of trauma care and accident surgery. Our primary aim is to facilitate the exchange of ideas, techniques and information among all members of the trauma team.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信