Microlevel analysis of smallholder farmers’ knowledge and perspectives of cassava pests, disease risks, and eco-friendly management techniques in two agroecological landscapes of Ghana
Benedicta Nsiah Frimpong , Victor Owusu , Robert Aidoo , Bright Owusu Asante , Allen Oppong , Justin Pita , Eveline M.F.W. Compaoré-Sawadogo , Ousmane Ndoye , Kouassi Modeste
{"title":"Microlevel analysis of smallholder farmers’ knowledge and perspectives of cassava pests, disease risks, and eco-friendly management techniques in two agroecological landscapes of Ghana","authors":"Benedicta Nsiah Frimpong , Victor Owusu , Robert Aidoo , Bright Owusu Asante , Allen Oppong , Justin Pita , Eveline M.F.W. Compaoré-Sawadogo , Ousmane Ndoye , Kouassi Modeste","doi":"10.1016/j.cropro.2025.107388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cassava, Africa's most significant tuberous crop and one of Ghana's strategic commodities, is currently threatened by pests and diseases. This study explored agroecological disparities in farmers' knowledge and perceptions regarding cassava pests, disease risks, and management approaches. We employed both descriptive and inferential statistics to analyze data collected from 511 smallholder cassava farmers across two distinct agroecological landscapes in Ghana. While farmers demonstrated a strong understanding of pests, diseases, and their causes, their knowledge of control measures and disease transmission between farms was lacking. The findings indicate that overall knowledge among farmers was moderate, with scores slightly above 50 % on knowledge-related questions. Farmers in the forest zone exhibited greater awareness of the benefits and challenges associated with integrated cassava disease management techniques compared to those in the forest-savannah transition zone. We conclude that there is a need to enhance farmers' capabilities in detecting, understanding, and managing cassava diseases. To improve farmers' knowledge and perceptions of crop health, a collaborative effort involving experts in cassava crop protection (entomologists, virologists, mycologists, and weed scientists), social scientists, advisory groups, and policymakers is essential.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10785,"journal":{"name":"Crop Protection","volume":"198 ","pages":"Article 107388"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261219425002807","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cassava, Africa's most significant tuberous crop and one of Ghana's strategic commodities, is currently threatened by pests and diseases. This study explored agroecological disparities in farmers' knowledge and perceptions regarding cassava pests, disease risks, and management approaches. We employed both descriptive and inferential statistics to analyze data collected from 511 smallholder cassava farmers across two distinct agroecological landscapes in Ghana. While farmers demonstrated a strong understanding of pests, diseases, and their causes, their knowledge of control measures and disease transmission between farms was lacking. The findings indicate that overall knowledge among farmers was moderate, with scores slightly above 50 % on knowledge-related questions. Farmers in the forest zone exhibited greater awareness of the benefits and challenges associated with integrated cassava disease management techniques compared to those in the forest-savannah transition zone. We conclude that there is a need to enhance farmers' capabilities in detecting, understanding, and managing cassava diseases. To improve farmers' knowledge and perceptions of crop health, a collaborative effort involving experts in cassava crop protection (entomologists, virologists, mycologists, and weed scientists), social scientists, advisory groups, and policymakers is essential.
期刊介绍:
The Editors of Crop Protection especially welcome papers describing an interdisciplinary approach showing how different control strategies can be integrated into practical pest management programs, covering high and low input agricultural systems worldwide. Crop Protection particularly emphasizes the practical aspects of control in the field and for protected crops, and includes work which may lead in the near future to more effective control. The journal does not duplicate the many existing excellent biological science journals, which deal mainly with the more fundamental aspects of plant pathology, applied zoology and weed science. Crop Protection covers all practical aspects of pest, disease and weed control, including the following topics:
-Abiotic damage-
Agronomic control methods-
Assessment of pest and disease damage-
Molecular methods for the detection and assessment of pests and diseases-
Biological control-
Biorational pesticides-
Control of animal pests of world crops-
Control of diseases of crop plants caused by microorganisms-
Control of weeds and integrated management-
Economic considerations-
Effects of plant growth regulators-
Environmental benefits of reduced pesticide use-
Environmental effects of pesticides-
Epidemiology of pests and diseases in relation to control-
GM Crops, and genetic engineering applications-
Importance and control of postharvest crop losses-
Integrated control-
Interrelationships and compatibility among different control strategies-
Invasive species as they relate to implications for crop protection-
Pesticide application methods-
Pest management-
Phytobiomes for pest and disease control-
Resistance management-
Sampling and monitoring schemes for diseases, nematodes, pests and weeds.