Jingyi Shen , Chao Geng , Ruiliang Liu , Yichao Zhao , Zhigang Wu , Kui Chen , Yu Peng , Ji Zhang , Jianfeng Lang
{"title":"Bridging the crafts: lead isotopes reveal the innovation of lead-glazed pottery in Warring States China","authors":"Jingyi Shen , Chao Geng , Ruiliang Liu , Yichao Zhao , Zhigang Wu , Kui Chen , Yu Peng , Ji Zhang , Jianfeng Lang","doi":"10.1016/j.jas.2025.106354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study reassesses the origin of low-fired lead-glazed pottery in ancient China through a systematic analysis of seven excavated specimens from the ancient Linzi City, the capital of the Qi State, dated to the late Warring States period (300–221 BCE). By integrating archaeological context, compositional and lead isotopic analysis, the research establishes these ceramics as the earliest scientifically verified lead-glazed pottery in China. The findings indicate that these wares were produced using a standardized technological protocol, locally sourced clay bodies coated with high-lead glazes (50–62 wt% PbO), exclusively colored by iron oxide (Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>), and fired in a reducing atmosphere, which represent a rather different process compared to the typical Chinese lead glaze technology since the Western Han dynasty (202BCE-8CE). Moreover, lead isotopic data attribute the lead source to highly radiogenic deposits that were locally available and mined for Qi bronze production, revealing a shared lead supply to both ceramic and metallurgical production. The study argues that the initial development of lead glazing emerged as a result of cross-craft interaction involving ceramic production, proto-porcelain, lead-barium siliceous materials, and, most significantly, leaded bronze manufacturing. These findings contribute to the ongoing debate regarding the earliest lead-glazed pottery, underscore the significance of cross-craft interactions in technological innovation, and reframe the Qi State as a key center for early ceramic experimentation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50254,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Archaeological Science","volume":"182 ","pages":"Article 106354"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Archaeological Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305440325002031","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study reassesses the origin of low-fired lead-glazed pottery in ancient China through a systematic analysis of seven excavated specimens from the ancient Linzi City, the capital of the Qi State, dated to the late Warring States period (300–221 BCE). By integrating archaeological context, compositional and lead isotopic analysis, the research establishes these ceramics as the earliest scientifically verified lead-glazed pottery in China. The findings indicate that these wares were produced using a standardized technological protocol, locally sourced clay bodies coated with high-lead glazes (50–62 wt% PbO), exclusively colored by iron oxide (Fe2O3), and fired in a reducing atmosphere, which represent a rather different process compared to the typical Chinese lead glaze technology since the Western Han dynasty (202BCE-8CE). Moreover, lead isotopic data attribute the lead source to highly radiogenic deposits that were locally available and mined for Qi bronze production, revealing a shared lead supply to both ceramic and metallurgical production. The study argues that the initial development of lead glazing emerged as a result of cross-craft interaction involving ceramic production, proto-porcelain, lead-barium siliceous materials, and, most significantly, leaded bronze manufacturing. These findings contribute to the ongoing debate regarding the earliest lead-glazed pottery, underscore the significance of cross-craft interactions in technological innovation, and reframe the Qi State as a key center for early ceramic experimentation.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Archaeological Science is aimed at archaeologists and scientists with particular interests in advancing the development and application of scientific techniques and methodologies to all areas of archaeology. This established monthly journal publishes focus articles, original research papers and major review articles, of wide archaeological significance. The journal provides an international forum for archaeologists and scientists from widely different scientific backgrounds who share a common interest in developing and applying scientific methods to inform major debates through improving the quality and reliability of scientific information derived from archaeological research.