Gut microbiota modulation using prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics for CD4+ T-cell recovery in HIV: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Q2 Medicine
Michael Owen Hogipranata , Muhammad Reva Aditya , Imanuel Yuerrico Subianto , Virginie Trias Salim , Valeska Theodora Beatrice , Kana Mardhiyyah , Dewi Indiastari
{"title":"Gut microbiota modulation using prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics for CD4+ T-cell recovery in HIV: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Michael Owen Hogipranata ,&nbsp;Muhammad Reva Aditya ,&nbsp;Imanuel Yuerrico Subianto ,&nbsp;Virginie Trias Salim ,&nbsp;Valeska Theodora Beatrice ,&nbsp;Kana Mardhiyyah ,&nbsp;Dewi Indiastari","doi":"10.1016/j.medmic.2025.100147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) compromises the immune system by targeting key regulatory lymphocytes essential for coordinating immune responses. It continues to pose a significant global health burden, with approximately 40 million cases recorded by the end of 2023. Currently, highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) is the key therapeutic strategy, but it has several limitations, prompting the importance of new therapeutic approaches. This paper evaluates the effectiveness of gut microbiota basesd immunomodulatory therapies, consisting of prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics in HIV treatment while considering clinical, socioeconomic, and therapeutic influencing factors.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study was conducted based on PRISMA guidelines using multiple databases. Studies were employed based on established inclusion parameters, focusing on the efficacy of gut microbiota interventions in CD4<sup>+</sup> T-cell counts.Subgroup analyses were performed based on intervention type, dosage, duration, HAART status, and clinical setting. Moreover, sensitivity analysis, meta-regression, and publication bias assessment were also performed to ensure findings robustness and explore source of heterogeneity.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 21 studies were assessed in this meta-analysis. Risk of bias assessment indicated that most studies had a low risk of bias, though some concerns were noted. Prebiotics showed the greatest improvement by a mean difference (MD) of 52.15 cells/mm<sup>3</sup> (95 % CI: −5.64 to 109.93), though not statistically significant (p = 0.08). Synbiotics showed a more consistent and statistically significant effect (MD = 39.48 cells/mm<sup>3</sup>; 95 % CI: 34.39 to 44.58; p &lt; 0.00001). Notably, greatest immunological benefits were observed among HAART-naive individuals, with low-dose prebiotics (4–10 g/day), moderate intervention durations (4–6 months), and in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Sensitivity analysis using leave-one-out method confirmed findings robustness, while meta-regression identified key variables contributing to heterogeneity. Moreover, publication bias using Egger's and Begg's test was not evident in most outcomes, except for LMIC-based studies, which showed potential small-study effects.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Gut microbiota based immunomodulators show promising potential in supporting immune function among people living with HIV. However, due to study variability, high heterogeneity and wide confidence intervals (CI) in some subgroups, these findings are hypothesis-generating. Further high-quality studies should focused in homogeneous populations to validate efficacy and guide clinical implementation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36019,"journal":{"name":"Medicine in Microecology","volume":"26 ","pages":"Article 100147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine in Microecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259009782500028X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) compromises the immune system by targeting key regulatory lymphocytes essential for coordinating immune responses. It continues to pose a significant global health burden, with approximately 40 million cases recorded by the end of 2023. Currently, highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) is the key therapeutic strategy, but it has several limitations, prompting the importance of new therapeutic approaches. This paper evaluates the effectiveness of gut microbiota basesd immunomodulatory therapies, consisting of prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics in HIV treatment while considering clinical, socioeconomic, and therapeutic influencing factors.

Methods

This study was conducted based on PRISMA guidelines using multiple databases. Studies were employed based on established inclusion parameters, focusing on the efficacy of gut microbiota interventions in CD4+ T-cell counts.Subgroup analyses were performed based on intervention type, dosage, duration, HAART status, and clinical setting. Moreover, sensitivity analysis, meta-regression, and publication bias assessment were also performed to ensure findings robustness and explore source of heterogeneity.

Results

A total of 21 studies were assessed in this meta-analysis. Risk of bias assessment indicated that most studies had a low risk of bias, though some concerns were noted. Prebiotics showed the greatest improvement by a mean difference (MD) of 52.15 cells/mm3 (95 % CI: −5.64 to 109.93), though not statistically significant (p = 0.08). Synbiotics showed a more consistent and statistically significant effect (MD = 39.48 cells/mm3; 95 % CI: 34.39 to 44.58; p < 0.00001). Notably, greatest immunological benefits were observed among HAART-naive individuals, with low-dose prebiotics (4–10 g/day), moderate intervention durations (4–6 months), and in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Sensitivity analysis using leave-one-out method confirmed findings robustness, while meta-regression identified key variables contributing to heterogeneity. Moreover, publication bias using Egger's and Begg's test was not evident in most outcomes, except for LMIC-based studies, which showed potential small-study effects.

Conclusion

Gut microbiota based immunomodulators show promising potential in supporting immune function among people living with HIV. However, due to study variability, high heterogeneity and wide confidence intervals (CI) in some subgroups, these findings are hypothesis-generating. Further high-quality studies should focused in homogeneous populations to validate efficacy and guide clinical implementation.
使用益生元、益生菌和合成菌调节艾滋病毒CD4+ t细胞恢复的肠道微生物群:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)通过靶向协调免疫反应所必需的关键调节淋巴细胞来损害免疫系统。它继续构成重大的全球卫生负担,到2023年底记录的病例约为4000万例。目前,高效抗逆转录病毒治疗(HAART)是关键的治疗策略,但它有一些局限性,促使新的治疗方法的重要性。本文在考虑临床、社会经济和治疗影响因素的情况下,评估了基于肠道微生物群的免疫调节疗法的有效性,包括益生元、益生菌和合成菌治疗HIV。方法本研究依据PRISMA指南,使用多个数据库进行。研究基于已建立的纳入参数,重点关注肠道微生物群干预对CD4+ t细胞计数的影响。根据干预类型、剂量、持续时间、HAART状态和临床环境进行亚组分析。此外,还进行了敏感性分析、meta回归和发表偏倚评估,以确保研究结果的稳健性并探索异质性的来源。结果本荟萃分析共评估了21项研究。偏倚风险评估表明,大多数研究的偏倚风险较低,但也注意到一些问题。益生元的改善效果最大,平均差异(MD)为52.15个细胞/mm3 (95% CI:−5.64至109.93),但无统计学意义(p = 0.08)。合生剂表现出更一致且具有统计学意义的效果(MD = 39.48 cells/mm3; 95% CI: 34.39 ~ 44.58; p < 0.00001)。值得注意的是,在低剂量益生元(4-10克/天)、中等干预时间(4-6个月)和低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)的haart初始个体中观察到最大的免疫益处。使用留一法的敏感性分析证实了结果的稳健性,而元回归确定了导致异质性的关键变量。此外,使用Egger's和Begg's检验的发表偏倚在大多数结果中并不明显,除了基于lmic的研究,这些研究显示出潜在的小研究效应。结论基于肠道微生物群的免疫调节剂在支持HIV感染者免疫功能方面具有良好的潜力。然而,由于研究的可变性、高异质性和某些亚组的宽置信区间(CI),这些发现是假设产生的。进一步的高质量研究应集中在同质人群中,以验证疗效并指导临床实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medicine in Microecology
Medicine in Microecology Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
76 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信