Wildfire probability assessment and analysis based on multi-source data in Guangxi Province, China

IF 7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Kun Xu , Xin Pan , Kevin Tansey , Akram Abdulla , Rufat Guluzade , Zi Yang , Min He , Congbao Zhu , Shile Yang , Yingbao Yang
{"title":"Wildfire probability assessment and analysis based on multi-source data in Guangxi Province, China","authors":"Kun Xu ,&nbsp;Xin Pan ,&nbsp;Kevin Tansey ,&nbsp;Akram Abdulla ,&nbsp;Rufat Guluzade ,&nbsp;Zi Yang ,&nbsp;Min He ,&nbsp;Congbao Zhu ,&nbsp;Shile Yang ,&nbsp;Yingbao Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.114148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Wildfires are key environmental variables in global climate monitoring systems that significantly impact ecosystems, human life, and property. This study assessed the probability of wildfires in Guangxi Province using multi-source data and the Evidence Belief Function (EBF) model. A stratified random sampling method was applied to evaluate the accuracy of the three wildfire remote sensing products (MCD64A1, Fire_CCI51, and MCD14ML). Among these, MCD64A1 was identified as the most reliable dataset for mapping wildfires in the region. By dividing the year into three wildfire occurrence periods (A, B, and C) and combining 14 wildfire factors from 2003 to 2018, the EBF model was used to map and analyze the spatial distribution of wildfire risk. The relative importance of each wildfire factor was evaluated using a Random Forest (RF) model. The validation results confirmed that the AUC values of the success rate of the EBF model were all greater than 0.7, indicating that the model performed well in wildfire risk assessments. The derived wildfire probability map showed strong spatial consistency between the assessed probability levels and observed wildfire events, with high-risk areas in the northwest, central, and northeast regions of Guangxi. Furthermore, relative humidity was identified as the most significant factor influencing wildfire probability, while land surface temperature (LST), wind speed, and a human influence indicator, the Human Footprint (HPF), also had a significant effect on wildfire probability. These findings highlight the reliability of the EBF and RF models as tools for prediction evaluation and provide insights into effective resource allocation and wildfire prevention strategies in the region.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"179 ","pages":"Article 114148"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25010805","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wildfires are key environmental variables in global climate monitoring systems that significantly impact ecosystems, human life, and property. This study assessed the probability of wildfires in Guangxi Province using multi-source data and the Evidence Belief Function (EBF) model. A stratified random sampling method was applied to evaluate the accuracy of the three wildfire remote sensing products (MCD64A1, Fire_CCI51, and MCD14ML). Among these, MCD64A1 was identified as the most reliable dataset for mapping wildfires in the region. By dividing the year into three wildfire occurrence periods (A, B, and C) and combining 14 wildfire factors from 2003 to 2018, the EBF model was used to map and analyze the spatial distribution of wildfire risk. The relative importance of each wildfire factor was evaluated using a Random Forest (RF) model. The validation results confirmed that the AUC values of the success rate of the EBF model were all greater than 0.7, indicating that the model performed well in wildfire risk assessments. The derived wildfire probability map showed strong spatial consistency between the assessed probability levels and observed wildfire events, with high-risk areas in the northwest, central, and northeast regions of Guangxi. Furthermore, relative humidity was identified as the most significant factor influencing wildfire probability, while land surface temperature (LST), wind speed, and a human influence indicator, the Human Footprint (HPF), also had a significant effect on wildfire probability. These findings highlight the reliability of the EBF and RF models as tools for prediction evaluation and provide insights into effective resource allocation and wildfire prevention strategies in the region.
基于多源数据的广西野火概率评估与分析
野火是全球气候监测系统中的关键环境变量,对生态系统、人类生命和财产产生重大影响。本文采用多源数据和证据置信函数(EBF)模型对广西森林火灾发生概率进行了评估。采用分层随机抽样方法对MCD64A1、Fire_CCI51和MCD14ML三种野火遥感产品的精度进行了评价。其中,MCD64A1被确定为该地区野火地图最可靠的数据集。通过将2003 - 2018年划分为A、B、C三个野火发生期,并结合14个野火因子,利用EBF模型对森林野火风险的空间分布进行了绘制和分析。使用随机森林(RF)模型评估每个野火因子的相对重要性。验证结果表明,EBF模型的成功率AUC值均大于0.7,表明该模型具有较好的野火风险评估效果。结果表明,估算的概率水平与观测到的野火事件在空间上具有较强的一致性,高危区分布在广西西北部、中部和东北部。此外,相对湿度是影响野火概率的最显著因子,地表温度、风速和人类足迹(HPF)对野火概率也有显著影响。这些发现突出了EBF和RF模型作为预测评估工具的可靠性,并为该地区有效的资源分配和野火预防策略提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Indicators
Ecological Indicators 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1163
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published. • All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices. • New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use. • Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources. • Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators. • Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs. • How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes. • Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators. • Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信