Monopsony in labor markets: Not important in the aggregate

IF 4.7 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Sami Alpanda
{"title":"Monopsony in labor markets: Not important in the aggregate","authors":"Sami Alpanda","doi":"10.1016/j.econmod.2025.107274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>I construct a New Keynesian dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model, where labor market power and wage rigidities arise partly on the labor demand and partly on the labor supply side. In particular, households supply two types of labor, one where labor market power lies with households as in the standard setup and one where labor market power lies with firms (i.e., monopsony). Estimations using Bayesian likelihood methods indicate that the fit of the hybrid model is slightly better than the standard setup in the literature with labor market power modeled fully on the household side. However, the estimated share of labor operating in monopsonistic markets is relatively small (about 12%), and thus, the hybrid model generates very similar dynamics to the standard setup.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48419,"journal":{"name":"Economic Modelling","volume":"152 ","pages":"Article 107274"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Modelling","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026499932500269X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

I construct a New Keynesian dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model, where labor market power and wage rigidities arise partly on the labor demand and partly on the labor supply side. In particular, households supply two types of labor, one where labor market power lies with households as in the standard setup and one where labor market power lies with firms (i.e., monopsony). Estimations using Bayesian likelihood methods indicate that the fit of the hybrid model is slightly better than the standard setup in the literature with labor market power modeled fully on the household side. However, the estimated share of labor operating in monopsonistic markets is relatively small (about 12%), and thus, the hybrid model generates very similar dynamics to the standard setup.
劳动力市场的垄断:总体上不重要
我构建了一个新凯恩斯主义动态随机一般均衡模型,其中劳动力市场力量和工资刚性部分出现在劳动力需求方面,部分出现在劳动力供给方面。特别是,家庭提供两种类型的劳动力,一种是标准设置中劳动力市场力量在于家庭,另一种是劳动力市场力量在于企业(即垄断)。使用贝叶斯似然方法的估计表明,混合模型的拟合略好于文献中完全基于家庭方面建模的劳动力市场力量的标准设置。然而,在垄断市场中,劳动力的估计份额相对较小(约为12%),因此,混合模型产生的动态与标准设置非常相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Economic Modelling
Economic Modelling ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
10.60%
发文量
295
期刊介绍: Economic Modelling fills a major gap in the economics literature, providing a single source of both theoretical and applied papers on economic modelling. The journal prime objective is to provide an international review of the state-of-the-art in economic modelling. Economic Modelling publishes the complete versions of many large-scale models of industrially advanced economies which have been developed for policy analysis. Examples are the Bank of England Model and the US Federal Reserve Board Model which had hitherto been unpublished. As individual models are revised and updated, the journal publishes subsequent papers dealing with these revisions, so keeping its readers as up to date as possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信