Sarah A. Ackroyd , Gabrielle Sudilovsky , Yan Che , Jennifer A. Bennett , S Diane Yamada , Gini F Fleming
{"title":"Analysis of racial differences in HER2 status and molecular subtype in grade 3 endometroid endometrial carcinoma","authors":"Sarah A. Ackroyd , Gabrielle Sudilovsky , Yan Che , Jennifer A. Bennett , S Diane Yamada , Gini F Fleming","doi":"10.1016/j.gore.2025.101936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To characterize stage I-III Grade 3 endometroid endometrial cancer (Gr3 EEC) by molecular subtype and human epithelial growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status and explore differences in characteristics by race.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We identified patients with a diagnosis of stage I-III Gr3 EEC from a single-institution health system cancer registry and pathologically confirmed the diagnosis. Review of the electronic health record was performed as needed to confirm patient characteristics. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) and immunohistochemical staining (IHC) for HER2 was performed on all primary tumors.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirty-four primary cases remained classified as stage I-III Gr3 EEC after pathologic review and exclusion of cases lacking in-house primary tumor for re-review. Fifteen were categorized as microsatellite unstable (MSI; 44 %), 10 as copy number high (CNH; 29 %), six as polymerase E mutant (<em>POLE</em>mut; 17.6 %) and three as copy number low (CNL; 8.8 %). Thirteen patients were Black, 18 were White, and 3 had a race of “other and/or unknown”. HER2 status by IHC in the primary tumor was 0 (n = 7; 20.5 %), 1+ (n = 11; 32 %), 2+ (n = 14; 41 %), 3+ (n = 1; 3 %). There was no difference in the distribution of TCGA subtype or HER2 status by race.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In stage I-III stage Gr3 EEC HER2 positivity (3 + ) was uncommon, but expression at the 2 + level was frequent, and did not differ by race. In this limited sample, there were no differences in distribution of TCGA subtype amongst patients with grade 3 EEC. Other causes should be explored to explain reported differences in outcomes in EEC by race.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12873,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologic Oncology Reports","volume":"61 ","pages":"Article 101936"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologic Oncology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352578925001614","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
To characterize stage I-III Grade 3 endometroid endometrial cancer (Gr3 EEC) by molecular subtype and human epithelial growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status and explore differences in characteristics by race.
Methods
We identified patients with a diagnosis of stage I-III Gr3 EEC from a single-institution health system cancer registry and pathologically confirmed the diagnosis. Review of the electronic health record was performed as needed to confirm patient characteristics. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) and immunohistochemical staining (IHC) for HER2 was performed on all primary tumors.
Results
Thirty-four primary cases remained classified as stage I-III Gr3 EEC after pathologic review and exclusion of cases lacking in-house primary tumor for re-review. Fifteen were categorized as microsatellite unstable (MSI; 44 %), 10 as copy number high (CNH; 29 %), six as polymerase E mutant (POLEmut; 17.6 %) and three as copy number low (CNL; 8.8 %). Thirteen patients were Black, 18 were White, and 3 had a race of “other and/or unknown”. HER2 status by IHC in the primary tumor was 0 (n = 7; 20.5 %), 1+ (n = 11; 32 %), 2+ (n = 14; 41 %), 3+ (n = 1; 3 %). There was no difference in the distribution of TCGA subtype or HER2 status by race.
Conclusion
In stage I-III stage Gr3 EEC HER2 positivity (3 + ) was uncommon, but expression at the 2 + level was frequent, and did not differ by race. In this limited sample, there were no differences in distribution of TCGA subtype amongst patients with grade 3 EEC. Other causes should be explored to explain reported differences in outcomes in EEC by race.
期刊介绍:
Gynecologic Oncology Reports is an online-only, open access journal devoted to the rapid publication of narrative review articles, survey articles, case reports, case series, letters to the editor regarding previously published manuscripts and other short communications in the field of gynecologic oncology. The journal will consider papers that concern tumors of the female reproductive tract, with originality, quality, and clarity the chief criteria of acceptance.