The present status of knowledge on the global use of rhinoceros dehorning: A systematic review

IF 4.4 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Lucy C. Chimes , Timothy Kuiper , Colleen T. Downs
{"title":"The present status of knowledge on the global use of rhinoceros dehorning: A systematic review","authors":"Lucy C. Chimes ,&nbsp;Timothy Kuiper ,&nbsp;Colleen T. Downs","doi":"10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Poaching remains a major threat to rhinoceros (hereafter rhino) species, particularly in southern Africa. In response, the use of dehorning (removing the horns of live rhinos) is increasing. We systematically reviewed 120 publications (44 % peer-reviewed) published prior to June 2024 to assess the present knowledge regarding rhino dehorning. The use of dehorning has increased across southern Africa, with no records of its use in eastern black rhinos or Asian rhino species, while the cost of dehorning per rhino and mortality rates associated with the dehorning procedure have decreased. The discussion of legal trade in relation to dehorning was the most common theme (56 %, n = 67), followed by biological/ecological impacts (24 %, n = 29) and anti-poaching effectiveness (23 %, n = 27). However, only 45 % and 37 % of the latter two themes were peer-reviewed, respectively, most of which only focused on one site and so were not generalisable to other areas. Publications discussing potential legal trade supplied through dehorning presented mixed views, with questions surrounding the potential conservation benefits of trade and the difficulty in predicting market responses. We found little evidence of any dehorning impacts on rhino reproduction, although there was some indication of changes to social structure and ranging behaviour, which warrant further investigation. The present peer- and non-peer-reviewed literature suggests dehorning is effective in reducing poaching on a site-specific scale. However, large-scale, peer-reviewed studies with robust counterfactual analyses, including on possible poaching displacement from dehorned to horned sites, are needed to inform global rhino conservation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55375,"journal":{"name":"Biological Conservation","volume":"311 ","pages":"Article 111456"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320725004938","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Poaching remains a major threat to rhinoceros (hereafter rhino) species, particularly in southern Africa. In response, the use of dehorning (removing the horns of live rhinos) is increasing. We systematically reviewed 120 publications (44 % peer-reviewed) published prior to June 2024 to assess the present knowledge regarding rhino dehorning. The use of dehorning has increased across southern Africa, with no records of its use in eastern black rhinos or Asian rhino species, while the cost of dehorning per rhino and mortality rates associated with the dehorning procedure have decreased. The discussion of legal trade in relation to dehorning was the most common theme (56 %, n = 67), followed by biological/ecological impacts (24 %, n = 29) and anti-poaching effectiveness (23 %, n = 27). However, only 45 % and 37 % of the latter two themes were peer-reviewed, respectively, most of which only focused on one site and so were not generalisable to other areas. Publications discussing potential legal trade supplied through dehorning presented mixed views, with questions surrounding the potential conservation benefits of trade and the difficulty in predicting market responses. We found little evidence of any dehorning impacts on rhino reproduction, although there was some indication of changes to social structure and ranging behaviour, which warrant further investigation. The present peer- and non-peer-reviewed literature suggests dehorning is effective in reducing poaching on a site-specific scale. However, large-scale, peer-reviewed studies with robust counterfactual analyses, including on possible poaching displacement from dehorned to horned sites, are needed to inform global rhino conservation.
全球犀牛去角利用现状:系统综述
偷猎仍然是犀牛(以下简称犀牛)物种的主要威胁,特别是在非洲南部。作为回应,使用去角(去掉活犀牛的角)的人越来越多。我们系统地审查了2024年6月之前发表的120篇出版物(44%经过同行评审),以评估目前关于犀牛去角的知识。在整个非洲南部,去角的使用有所增加,但没有在东部黑犀牛或亚洲犀牛物种中使用的记录,而每头犀牛去角的成本和与去角过程相关的死亡率已经下降。关于合法贸易与去角相关的讨论是最常见的主题(56%,n = 67),其次是生物/生态影响(24%,n = 29)和反偷猎有效性(23%,n = 27)。然而,后两个主题分别只有45%和37%经过同行评审,其中大多数只关注一个站点,因此不能推广到其他领域。讨论通过去角提供的潜在合法贸易的出版物提出了不同的观点,其中涉及贸易的潜在保护利益和难以预测市场反应的问题。尽管有一些迹象表明犀牛的社会结构和范围行为发生了变化,但我们发现很少有证据表明去角对犀牛繁殖有任何影响,这值得进一步调查。目前的同行和非同行评议的文献表明,去角对减少特定地点的偷猎是有效的。然而,需要进行大规模的同行评议研究,并进行强有力的反事实分析,包括从无角地区到有角地区可能发生的偷猎转移,以便为全球犀牛保护提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biological Conservation
Biological Conservation 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
295
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Biological Conservation is an international leading journal in the discipline of conservation biology. The journal publishes articles spanning a diverse range of fields that contribute to the biological, sociological, and economic dimensions of conservation and natural resource management. The primary aim of Biological Conservation is the publication of high-quality papers that advance the science and practice of conservation, or which demonstrate the application of conservation principles for natural resource management and policy. Therefore it will be of interest to a broad international readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信