Prevention strategies and modifiable risk factors for spine, chest, abdominal and/or pelvic injury and pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis for the Female, woman and girl Athlete Injury pRevention (FAIR) consensus
Jackie L Whittaker, Jenna M Schulz, Jean-Michel Galarneau, Isabel S Moore, Kathryn E Ackerman, Miranda Butler, Kathryn Dane, Marc-Olivier Dubé, Marcella Ferraz Pazzinatto, Christina D Gomez, K Alix Hayden, Hana Marmura, Rami Mizuta, Andrea Britt Mosler, Geoff Schneider, Kathryn J Schneider, Saurab Sharma, Larissa Trease, Fiona Wilson, Jane S Thornton, Kay M Crossley, Carolyn A Emery
{"title":"Prevention strategies and modifiable risk factors for spine, chest, abdominal and/or pelvic injury and pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis for the Female, woman and girl Athlete Injury pRevention (FAIR) consensus","authors":"Jackie L Whittaker, Jenna M Schulz, Jean-Michel Galarneau, Isabel S Moore, Kathryn E Ackerman, Miranda Butler, Kathryn Dane, Marc-Olivier Dubé, Marcella Ferraz Pazzinatto, Christina D Gomez, K Alix Hayden, Hana Marmura, Rami Mizuta, Andrea Britt Mosler, Geoff Schneider, Kathryn J Schneider, Saurab Sharma, Larissa Trease, Fiona Wilson, Jane S Thornton, Kay M Crossley, Carolyn A Emery","doi":"10.1136/bjsports-2025-109900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective Investigate prevention interventions and potential modifiable risk factors (MRFs) for female/woman/girl athletes’ spine, chest, abdominal or pelvic injury and/or pain. Design Systematic review with meta-analyses, semiquantitative analyses and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. Data sources MEDLINE, CINAHL, APA PsycINFO, CDSR, CENTRAL, SPORTDiscus, EMBASE, ERIC. Eligibility Primary data studies with comparison group(s) assessing the association of prevention interventions and/or MRFs for spine, chest, abdominal and/or pelvic injury/pain with ≥1 female/woman/girl athlete in each study group. Results Across 105 studies (n=11 interventions, n=92 MRFs, n=2 both, n=35 female/woman/girl-specific estimates) including 59 833 participants (23.7% females/women/girls) 9 injury/pain outcomes were assessed (n=74 low-back, n=14 back, n=13 neck, n=5 pelvis, n=3 thoracic, n=3 abdominal, n=3 trunk, n=2 rib, n=1 breast). Three prevention strategies (exercise, equipment, rule-change) and 22 MRFs were identified. High risk of confounding bias (Downs and Black quality assessment tool) was present in 92% and 63% of intervention and MRF studies, respectively. Considering female/woman/girl estimates, we performed meta-analyses (standardised mean-difference) on 4 MRFs (body mass, body mass index (BMI), weekly training hours, spinal flexion) for low-back pain (LBP) and semiquantitative analyses for one intervention (exercise), and 3 MRFs (yearly training load, hip motion, hip strength) for LBP. Very low-certainty evidence suggests no difference in body mass (g=0.28, 95% CI −0.06 to 0.62; I2=67.7%), BMI (g=0.22, 95% CI −0.25 to 0.69; I2=68.2%), weekly training hours (g=0.15, 95% CI −0.29 to 0.58; I2=45.6%) or spinal flexion (g=0.27, 95% CI −0.23 to 0.76; I2=40.4%) between female/women/girls athletes with and without LBP. Conclusions There is limited knowledge about prevention interventions or MRFs for female/women/girl athletes’ spine, chest, abdominal and/or pelvic injury/pain. PROSPERO registration number CRD42024479654. Data are available on reasonable request. Deidentified data can be made available on reasonable request to the corresponding author. Please email the corresponding author with a written proposal outlining the specific research aims and analysis plan and why these specific data are needed. A formal data-sharing agreement between institutions will be required.","PeriodicalId":9276,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":16.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2025-109900","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective Investigate prevention interventions and potential modifiable risk factors (MRFs) for female/woman/girl athletes’ spine, chest, abdominal or pelvic injury and/or pain. Design Systematic review with meta-analyses, semiquantitative analyses and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. Data sources MEDLINE, CINAHL, APA PsycINFO, CDSR, CENTRAL, SPORTDiscus, EMBASE, ERIC. Eligibility Primary data studies with comparison group(s) assessing the association of prevention interventions and/or MRFs for spine, chest, abdominal and/or pelvic injury/pain with ≥1 female/woman/girl athlete in each study group. Results Across 105 studies (n=11 interventions, n=92 MRFs, n=2 both, n=35 female/woman/girl-specific estimates) including 59 833 participants (23.7% females/women/girls) 9 injury/pain outcomes were assessed (n=74 low-back, n=14 back, n=13 neck, n=5 pelvis, n=3 thoracic, n=3 abdominal, n=3 trunk, n=2 rib, n=1 breast). Three prevention strategies (exercise, equipment, rule-change) and 22 MRFs were identified. High risk of confounding bias (Downs and Black quality assessment tool) was present in 92% and 63% of intervention and MRF studies, respectively. Considering female/woman/girl estimates, we performed meta-analyses (standardised mean-difference) on 4 MRFs (body mass, body mass index (BMI), weekly training hours, spinal flexion) for low-back pain (LBP) and semiquantitative analyses for one intervention (exercise), and 3 MRFs (yearly training load, hip motion, hip strength) for LBP. Very low-certainty evidence suggests no difference in body mass (g=0.28, 95% CI −0.06 to 0.62; I2=67.7%), BMI (g=0.22, 95% CI −0.25 to 0.69; I2=68.2%), weekly training hours (g=0.15, 95% CI −0.29 to 0.58; I2=45.6%) or spinal flexion (g=0.27, 95% CI −0.23 to 0.76; I2=40.4%) between female/women/girls athletes with and without LBP. Conclusions There is limited knowledge about prevention interventions or MRFs for female/women/girl athletes’ spine, chest, abdominal and/or pelvic injury/pain. PROSPERO registration number CRD42024479654. Data are available on reasonable request. Deidentified data can be made available on reasonable request to the corresponding author. Please email the corresponding author with a written proposal outlining the specific research aims and analysis plan and why these specific data are needed. A formal data-sharing agreement between institutions will be required.
期刊介绍:
The British Journal of Sports Medicine (BJSM) is a dynamic platform that presents groundbreaking research, thought-provoking reviews, and meaningful discussions on sport and exercise medicine. Our focus encompasses various clinically-relevant aspects such as physiotherapy, physical therapy, and rehabilitation. With an aim to foster innovation, education, and knowledge translation, we strive to bridge the gap between research and practical implementation in the field. Our multi-media approach, including web, print, video, and audio resources, along with our active presence on social media, connects a global community of healthcare professionals dedicated to treating active individuals.