Michael J. Ford, Steven T. Lindley, Katie A. Barnas, Andrew O. Shelton, Brian C. Spence, Laurie A. Weitkamp, Damon M. Holzer, David A. Boughton, Elizabeth E. Holmes, James M. Myers, Chris E. Jordan, Heidi Fish, Martin Liermann, Michael R. O'Farrell, Nathan J. Mantua, Rachel C. Johnson, William H. Satterthwaite, Thomas H. Williams
{"title":"Abundance Trends of Pacific Salmon During a Quarter Century of ESA Protection","authors":"Michael J. Ford, Steven T. Lindley, Katie A. Barnas, Andrew O. Shelton, Brian C. Spence, Laurie A. Weitkamp, Damon M. Holzer, David A. Boughton, Elizabeth E. Holmes, James M. Myers, Chris E. Jordan, Heidi Fish, Martin Liermann, Michael R. O'Farrell, Nathan J. Mantua, Rachel C. Johnson, William H. Satterthwaite, Thomas H. Williams","doi":"10.1111/faf.70019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Between 1989 and 2007, 28 Distinct Population Segments (DPS) of Pacific salmon (<jats:italic>Oncorhynchus</jats:italic> spp.) spawning in rivers in California and the Pacific Northwest (Oregon, Washington, Idaho) were listed (protected) under the US Endangered Species Act (ESA). In the roughly 25 years since then, considerable efforts have been made to recover these populations, but no DPS has increased sufficiently to be delisted. We evaluated abundance trends of ESA‐listed Pacific salmon DPS, along with DPS that were not ESA‐listed. Our goal was to evaluate whether protected DPS increased in abundance during the period of protection (nominally 1995–2020 in our study), either in absolute terms or relative to the unprotected DPS. A majority of the protected DPS had increasing abundance trends over this time period, and protected populations had higher median trends than non‐protected populations of the same species. Geographically, populations in the Pacific Northwest had higher median trends than those in California. Among species of protected populations, Chinook salmon (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\"><jats:italic>O. tshawytscha</jats:italic></jats:styled-content> ), chum salmon (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\"><jats:italic>O. keta</jats:italic></jats:styled-content> ) and sockeye salmon (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\"><jats:italic>O. nerka</jats:italic></jats:styled-content> ) had higher median trends than coho salmon (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\"><jats:italic>O. kisutch</jats:italic></jats:styled-content> ) and steelhead (anadromous <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\"><jats:italic>O. mykiss</jats:italic></jats:styled-content> ). For most DPS (listed and unlisted), trends in harvest rates and hatchery releases were relatively stable during the same time period, whereas trends in indicators related to freshwater and marine climate were generally negative for salmon. Our results suggest that salmon recovery actions may have helped to stabilise and increase protected DPS, but most remain far below their recovery goals.","PeriodicalId":169,"journal":{"name":"Fish and Fisheries","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fish and Fisheries","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.70019","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Between 1989 and 2007, 28 Distinct Population Segments (DPS) of Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) spawning in rivers in California and the Pacific Northwest (Oregon, Washington, Idaho) were listed (protected) under the US Endangered Species Act (ESA). In the roughly 25 years since then, considerable efforts have been made to recover these populations, but no DPS has increased sufficiently to be delisted. We evaluated abundance trends of ESA‐listed Pacific salmon DPS, along with DPS that were not ESA‐listed. Our goal was to evaluate whether protected DPS increased in abundance during the period of protection (nominally 1995–2020 in our study), either in absolute terms or relative to the unprotected DPS. A majority of the protected DPS had increasing abundance trends over this time period, and protected populations had higher median trends than non‐protected populations of the same species. Geographically, populations in the Pacific Northwest had higher median trends than those in California. Among species of protected populations, Chinook salmon (O. tshawytscha ), chum salmon (O. keta ) and sockeye salmon (O. nerka ) had higher median trends than coho salmon (O. kisutch ) and steelhead (anadromous O. mykiss ). For most DPS (listed and unlisted), trends in harvest rates and hatchery releases were relatively stable during the same time period, whereas trends in indicators related to freshwater and marine climate were generally negative for salmon. Our results suggest that salmon recovery actions may have helped to stabilise and increase protected DPS, but most remain far below their recovery goals.
期刊介绍:
Fish and Fisheries adopts a broad, interdisciplinary approach to the subject of fish biology and fisheries. It draws contributions in the form of major synoptic papers and syntheses or meta-analyses that lay out new approaches, re-examine existing findings, methods or theory, and discuss papers and commentaries from diverse areas. Focal areas include fish palaeontology, molecular biology and ecology, genetics, biochemistry, physiology, ecology, behaviour, evolutionary studies, conservation, assessment, population dynamics, mathematical modelling, ecosystem analysis and the social, economic and policy aspects of fisheries where they are grounded in a scientific approach. A paper in Fish and Fisheries must draw upon all key elements of the existing literature on a topic, normally have a broad geographic and/or taxonomic scope, and provide general points which make it compelling to a wide range of readers whatever their geographical location. So, in short, we aim to publish articles that make syntheses of old or synoptic, long-term or spatially widespread data, introduce or consolidate fresh concepts or theory, or, in the Ghoti section, briefly justify preliminary, new synoptic ideas. Please note that authors of submissions not meeting this mandate will be directed to the appropriate primary literature.