Byzantium and the Crusades: Constantine X's Embassy to Honorius II in 1062

IF 0.6 3区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY
History Pub Date : 2025-07-08 DOI:10.1111/1468-229X.70032
JONATHAN HARRIS
{"title":"Byzantium and the Crusades: Constantine X's Embassy to Honorius II in 1062","authors":"JONATHAN HARRIS","doi":"10.1111/1468-229X.70032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Byzantine emperor Alexios I's 1095 embassy to Pope Urban II has been characterized in three different ways: as a request for troops that inadvertently triggered the First Crusade, as a manipulation of western reverence for the Holy Sepulchre and as active Byzantine–papal collaboration. An earlier approach to the papacy by Alexios’ predecessor, Michael VII, has also been highlighted. One piece of evidence has been neglected, however. According to Benzo of Alba, as early as 1062, Emperor Constantine X sent a letter to the anti-pope Honorius II in which oblique mention is made of the liberation of Jerusalem. This document has usually been regarded as a fabrication designed to advance Benzo's own agenda. By contrast, this article considers whether Benzo's text might in fact be his rendering of a genuine Byzantine letter, full of errors and misunderstandings, but retaining elements of the original. On that basis, three areas in which the 1062 embassy may be of significance will be explored: Constantine X's response to the changing situation in Italy during the 1060s, Byzantine attempts to link ecclesiastical reconciliation to an anti-Norman alliance, and a possible early example of exploitation of western reverence for the Holy Sepulchre to bring in aid against new enemies in the east. On the basis of the last point, it will be suggested that Byzantine involvement in the genesis of the First Crusade may have begun over thirty years before it was launched.</p>","PeriodicalId":13162,"journal":{"name":"History","volume":"110 392","pages":"459-473"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1468-229X.70032","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-229X.70032","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Byzantine emperor Alexios I's 1095 embassy to Pope Urban II has been characterized in three different ways: as a request for troops that inadvertently triggered the First Crusade, as a manipulation of western reverence for the Holy Sepulchre and as active Byzantine–papal collaboration. An earlier approach to the papacy by Alexios’ predecessor, Michael VII, has also been highlighted. One piece of evidence has been neglected, however. According to Benzo of Alba, as early as 1062, Emperor Constantine X sent a letter to the anti-pope Honorius II in which oblique mention is made of the liberation of Jerusalem. This document has usually been regarded as a fabrication designed to advance Benzo's own agenda. By contrast, this article considers whether Benzo's text might in fact be his rendering of a genuine Byzantine letter, full of errors and misunderstandings, but retaining elements of the original. On that basis, three areas in which the 1062 embassy may be of significance will be explored: Constantine X's response to the changing situation in Italy during the 1060s, Byzantine attempts to link ecclesiastical reconciliation to an anti-Norman alliance, and a possible early example of exploitation of western reverence for the Holy Sepulchre to bring in aid against new enemies in the east. On the basis of the last point, it will be suggested that Byzantine involvement in the genesis of the First Crusade may have begun over thirty years before it was launched.

拜占庭和十字军东征:1062年君士坦丁十世对霍诺留斯二世的使节
拜占庭皇帝阿历克修斯一世(Alexios I)在1095年向教皇乌尔班二世(Urban II)派遣大使馆,有三种不同的说法:一种是请求出兵,无意中引发了第一次十字军东征;一种是对西方对圣墓(Holy Sepulchre)的崇敬之情的操纵;阿历克修斯的前任迈克尔七世(Michael VII)对教皇职位的早期态度也得到了强调。然而,有一个证据却被忽视了。根据阿尔巴的本佐,早在1062年,君士坦丁十世皇帝给反教皇霍诺里乌斯二世写了一封信,其中间接提到了耶路撒冷的解放。这份文件通常被认为是为了推进本佐自己的议程而捏造的。相比之下,本文考虑的是,本佐的文本实际上是否可能是他对真正的拜占庭书信的渲染,充满了错误和误解,但保留了原文的元素。在此基础上,我们将探讨1062年大使馆可能具有重要意义的三个方面:1060年代,君士坦丁十世对意大利不断变化的局势的反应,拜占庭试图将教会和解与反诺曼联盟联系起来,以及利用西方对圣墓的崇敬为东方的新敌人带来援助的可能的早期例子。在最后一点的基础上,我们认为拜占庭参与第一次十字军东征的起源可能在它发动前30多年就开始了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
History
History HISTORY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: First published in 1912, History has been a leader in its field ever since. It is unique in its range and variety, packing its pages with stimulating articles and extensive book reviews. History balances its broad chronological coverage with a wide geographical spread of articles featuring contributions from social, political, cultural, economic and ecclesiastical historians. History seeks to publish articles on broad, challenging themes, which not only display sound scholarship which is embedded within current historiographical debates, but push those debates forward. History encourages submissions which are also attractively and clearly written. Reviews: An integral part of each issue is the review section giving critical analysis of the latest scholarship across an extensive chronological and geographical range.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信