A Survey on Methotrexate Prescribing and Monitoring Practices in Ireland

IF 0.5
Ji Fung Yong, Fei Lai, Claire Quigley, Li Jie Helena Yoo, Claudine Howard-James, Fatma Al Hosni, Gregg Murray, Anne-Marie Tobin
{"title":"A Survey on Methotrexate Prescribing and Monitoring Practices in Ireland","authors":"Ji Fung Yong,&nbsp;Fei Lai,&nbsp;Claire Quigley,&nbsp;Li Jie Helena Yoo,&nbsp;Claudine Howard-James,&nbsp;Fatma Al Hosni,&nbsp;Gregg Murray,&nbsp;Anne-Marie Tobin","doi":"10.1002/jvc2.70046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Methotrexate, originally an anti-neoplastic agent, is now extensively used at lower doses in dermatology and rheumatology for chronic inflammatory conditions. While its safety is supported by routine blood monitoring, there remains variability in recommended monitoring frequency, folic acid supplementation, liver function testing and the role of specific biomarkers like Type III Procollagen Peptide (PIIINP).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to compare methotrexate prescribing and monitoring practices in Ireland with various national guidelines, including those from the European Medicines Agency (EMA), British Association of Dermatologists (BAD) and European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR). The goal was to document current practices among dermatologists and rheumatologists in Ireland to identify any discrepancies in methotrexate prescribing and monitoring.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>An online survey was distributed to members of the Irish Association of Dermatologists (IAD) and the Irish Society of Rheumatology (ISR) in July 2024. The questionnaire covered pretreatment screening, blood monitoring practices, folic acid supplementation and adverse events. Data was finalised and analysed in September 2024.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of the 52 respondents, all conducted baseline full blood count (FBC), renal profile (RP) and liver function tests (LFTs). Dermatologists were significantly more likely to perform infectious disease screenings compared to rheumatologists (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). When initiating methotrexate, only 17 practitioners (32.7%) employed a test dose of 2.5–5 mg weekly, with a statistically significant difference (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) observed in the starting doses of methotrexate. All respondents prescribed folic acid supplementation, with a statistically significant (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) noted in supplementation practices between the two specialties. Abnormal LFTs/PIIINP prompted hepatology referrals for 48%. Seven (13%) reported irreversible liver damage cases, and one (2%) death from pneumonia was noted.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This study highlights significant discrepancies in methotrexate prescribing and monitoring practices among Irish clinicians, similar to the various international guidelines. These variations underscore the need for updated, unified guidelines to ensure consistent and safe methotrexate use across the specialties.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":94325,"journal":{"name":"JEADV clinical practice","volume":"4 4","pages":"774-782"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jvc2.70046","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JEADV clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jvc2.70046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Methotrexate, originally an anti-neoplastic agent, is now extensively used at lower doses in dermatology and rheumatology for chronic inflammatory conditions. While its safety is supported by routine blood monitoring, there remains variability in recommended monitoring frequency, folic acid supplementation, liver function testing and the role of specific biomarkers like Type III Procollagen Peptide (PIIINP).

Objectives

This study aimed to compare methotrexate prescribing and monitoring practices in Ireland with various national guidelines, including those from the European Medicines Agency (EMA), British Association of Dermatologists (BAD) and European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR). The goal was to document current practices among dermatologists and rheumatologists in Ireland to identify any discrepancies in methotrexate prescribing and monitoring.

Methods

An online survey was distributed to members of the Irish Association of Dermatologists (IAD) and the Irish Society of Rheumatology (ISR) in July 2024. The questionnaire covered pretreatment screening, blood monitoring practices, folic acid supplementation and adverse events. Data was finalised and analysed in September 2024.

Results

Of the 52 respondents, all conducted baseline full blood count (FBC), renal profile (RP) and liver function tests (LFTs). Dermatologists were significantly more likely to perform infectious disease screenings compared to rheumatologists (p < 0.05). When initiating methotrexate, only 17 practitioners (32.7%) employed a test dose of 2.5–5 mg weekly, with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) observed in the starting doses of methotrexate. All respondents prescribed folic acid supplementation, with a statistically significant (p < 0.05) noted in supplementation practices between the two specialties. Abnormal LFTs/PIIINP prompted hepatology referrals for 48%. Seven (13%) reported irreversible liver damage cases, and one (2%) death from pneumonia was noted.

Conclusions

This study highlights significant discrepancies in methotrexate prescribing and monitoring practices among Irish clinicians, similar to the various international guidelines. These variations underscore the need for updated, unified guidelines to ensure consistent and safe methotrexate use across the specialties.

Abstract Image

爱尔兰甲氨蝶呤处方和监测实践调查
甲氨蝶呤最初是一种抗肿瘤药物,现在在皮肤病学和风湿病学中广泛使用低剂量治疗慢性炎症。虽然其安全性得到了常规血液监测的支持,但在推荐监测频率、叶酸补充、肝功能检测以及III型前胶原肽(PIIINP)等特定生物标志物的作用方面仍存在差异。本研究旨在比较爱尔兰的甲氨蝶呤处方和监测实践与各种国家指南,包括欧洲药品管理局(EMA)、英国皮肤科医生协会(BAD)和欧洲风湿病协会联盟(EULAR)的指南。目的是记录爱尔兰皮肤科医生和风湿病学家目前的做法,以确定甲氨蝶呤处方和监测中的任何差异。方法于2024年7月对爱尔兰皮肤科医师协会(IAD)和爱尔兰风湿病学会(ISR)的会员进行在线调查。调查问卷涵盖了预处理筛选、血液监测实践、叶酸补充和不良事件。数据于2024年9月完成并分析。结果在52名应答者中,所有人都进行了基线全血细胞计数(FBC)、肾谱(RP)和肝功能检查(LFTs)。皮肤科医生进行传染病筛查的可能性明显高于风湿病医生(p < 0.05)。当开始使用甲氨蝶呤时,只有17名从业者(32.7%)使用2.5 - 5mg /周的试验剂量,在甲氨蝶呤的开始剂量上观察到有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。所有受访者都规定补充叶酸,在两个专业之间的补充实践中有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。LFTs/PIIINP异常促使48%的患者转诊。7例(13%)报告了不可逆肝损伤病例,1例(2%)死于肺炎。结论:本研究突出了爱尔兰临床医生在甲氨蝶呤处方和监测实践方面的显著差异,类似于各种国际指南。这些差异强调需要更新、统一的指南,以确保甲氨蝶呤在各专科的一致和安全使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信