Emmanuel Yeboah Okyere, Michael K Miyittah, Jones Abrefa Danquah
{"title":"Assessing the global landscape of microfibre pollution: a systematic review","authors":"Emmanuel Yeboah Okyere, Michael K Miyittah, Jones Abrefa Danquah","doi":"10.1007/s10452-025-10199-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper touched on the issue of microfibre as it is gaining worldwide attention within the academic and industrial environment. The study was done using secondary data sourced from the SCOPUS platform and Google Scholar. The study reviewed the concept of microfibre, its sources, effects, and management following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The review brought to light that microfibre is a confusing concept as different practitioners relate to it differently. Also, the common sources of microfibre put forth by various studies include the textile industry, laundering processes, and wastewater treatment plants. However, there are notable differences in emphasis and scope across studies, and there are contrasting perspectives regarding the magnitude and significance of certain sources. While there is a consensus among researchers regarding the detrimental impacts of microfibres on aquatic ecosystems and biota, the specific mechanisms and severity of these effects vary considerably. The studies reviewed agreed on the urgency of addressing microfibre pollution; there is, however, a diversity of perspectives on mitigation strategies reflecting the complex and multifaceted nature of the issue. The study recommended research gaps that have been silent, but are necessary to tackle the problem of microfibre pollution.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8262,"journal":{"name":"Aquatic Ecology","volume":"59 3","pages":"837 - 848"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aquatic Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10452-025-10199-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper touched on the issue of microfibre as it is gaining worldwide attention within the academic and industrial environment. The study was done using secondary data sourced from the SCOPUS platform and Google Scholar. The study reviewed the concept of microfibre, its sources, effects, and management following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The review brought to light that microfibre is a confusing concept as different practitioners relate to it differently. Also, the common sources of microfibre put forth by various studies include the textile industry, laundering processes, and wastewater treatment plants. However, there are notable differences in emphasis and scope across studies, and there are contrasting perspectives regarding the magnitude and significance of certain sources. While there is a consensus among researchers regarding the detrimental impacts of microfibres on aquatic ecosystems and biota, the specific mechanisms and severity of these effects vary considerably. The studies reviewed agreed on the urgency of addressing microfibre pollution; there is, however, a diversity of perspectives on mitigation strategies reflecting the complex and multifaceted nature of the issue. The study recommended research gaps that have been silent, but are necessary to tackle the problem of microfibre pollution.
期刊介绍:
Aquatic Ecology publishes timely, peer-reviewed original papers relating to the ecology of fresh, brackish, estuarine and marine environments. Papers on fundamental and applied novel research in both the field and the laboratory, including descriptive or experimental studies, will be included in the journal. Preference will be given to studies that address timely and current topics and are integrative and critical in approach. We discourage papers that describe presence and abundance of aquatic biota in local habitats as well as papers that are pure systematic.
The journal provides a forum for the aquatic ecologist - limnologist and oceanologist alike- to discuss ecological issues related to processes and structures at different integration levels from individuals to populations, to communities and entire ecosystems.