Can digital technologies and artificial intelligence enhance co-creation in public health? A Health CASCADE needs assessment study and critical recommendations

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Q.E.A. Loisel , G. Balaskas , H. Papadopoulos , D. Pappa , S.F.M. Chastin
{"title":"Can digital technologies and artificial intelligence enhance co-creation in public health? A Health CASCADE needs assessment study and critical recommendations","authors":"Q.E.A. Loisel ,&nbsp;G. Balaskas ,&nbsp;H. Papadopoulos ,&nbsp;D. Pappa ,&nbsp;S.F.M. Chastin","doi":"10.1016/j.puhe.2025.105921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to assess digital technology usage in co-creation for public health, identify practitioners’ technology needs and preferences, and determine key factors guiding technology choices.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>A structured consensus protocol was employed to engage experts with wide-ranging expertise who have applied co-creation in different areas.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>First, a virtual workshop with 12 experts generated statements on the current use of digital tools and the desired features for co-creation. Next, an online survey gathered additional insights from 14 practitioners. Qualitative content analysis was then conducted to categorise 123 usage statements, 91 wish statements, and 25 choice-factor statements. Finally, a consensus event validated and refined the categorisations.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Communication and data handling emerged as central technologies, reflecting the need to overcome language barriers, facilitate engagement, and analyse feedback. Practitioners consistently wished for improved affordability, intuitive interfaces, and inclusive functionalities to support diverse co-creator groups. Ethical and security considerations, including GDPR compliance, were also highlighted, emphasising the importance of trust and data protection. Factors influencing technology choices ranged from cost and ease of implementation to interoperability and overall process support, underscoring the demand for user-friendly, secure, and feature-rich tools.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Digital technologies, including artificial intelligence, can significantly enhance co-creation in public health by promoting inclusivity, streamlining collaboration, and supporting evidence-based decision-making. Ensuring affordability, ethical integrity, and practical usability is essential for maximising impact and fostering equitable outcomes in public health co-creation efforts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49651,"journal":{"name":"Public Health","volume":"248 ","pages":"Article 105921"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033350625003671","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

This study aimed to assess digital technology usage in co-creation for public health, identify practitioners’ technology needs and preferences, and determine key factors guiding technology choices.

Study design

A structured consensus protocol was employed to engage experts with wide-ranging expertise who have applied co-creation in different areas.

Methods

First, a virtual workshop with 12 experts generated statements on the current use of digital tools and the desired features for co-creation. Next, an online survey gathered additional insights from 14 practitioners. Qualitative content analysis was then conducted to categorise 123 usage statements, 91 wish statements, and 25 choice-factor statements. Finally, a consensus event validated and refined the categorisations.

Results

Communication and data handling emerged as central technologies, reflecting the need to overcome language barriers, facilitate engagement, and analyse feedback. Practitioners consistently wished for improved affordability, intuitive interfaces, and inclusive functionalities to support diverse co-creator groups. Ethical and security considerations, including GDPR compliance, were also highlighted, emphasising the importance of trust and data protection. Factors influencing technology choices ranged from cost and ease of implementation to interoperability and overall process support, underscoring the demand for user-friendly, secure, and feature-rich tools.

Conclusions

Digital technologies, including artificial intelligence, can significantly enhance co-creation in public health by promoting inclusivity, streamlining collaboration, and supporting evidence-based decision-making. Ensuring affordability, ethical integrity, and practical usability is essential for maximising impact and fostering equitable outcomes in public health co-creation efforts.
数字技术和人工智能能否促进公共卫生领域的共同创造?健康级联需要评估研究和关键建议
目的本研究旨在评估数字技术在公共卫生共同创造中的使用情况,确定从业者的技术需求和偏好,并确定指导技术选择的关键因素。研究设计采用结构化的共识协议来吸引具有广泛专业知识的专家,他们在不同领域应用了共同创造。方法首先,由12位专家组成的虚拟研讨会就数字工具的当前使用情况和共同创造所需的功能发表了声明。接下来,一项在线调查从14名从业者那里收集了额外的见解。然后进行定性内容分析,对123个用法语句、91个愿望语句和25个选择因素语句进行分类。最后,一个共识事件验证并改进了分类。结果沟通和数据处理成为核心技术,反映了克服语言障碍、促进参与和分析反馈的需求。从业者始终希望改进可负担性、直观的界面和包容性的功能,以支持不同的共同创建者群体。还强调了道德和安全方面的考虑,包括GDPR合规性,强调了信任和数据保护的重要性。影响技术选择的因素从成本和易于实现到互操作性和整体过程支持,强调了对用户友好、安全和功能丰富的工具的需求。结论包括人工智能在内的数字技术可以通过促进包容性、简化协作和支持循证决策,显著增强公共卫生领域的共同创造。确保负担能力、道德操守和实际可用性对于公共卫生共同创造努力的影响最大化和促进公平结果至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Public Health
Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Public Health is an international, multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal. It publishes original papers, reviews and short reports on all aspects of the science, philosophy, and practice of public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信