Evaluating long-term skill retention following teledidactic vs. on-campus musculoskeletal ultrasound training: The TELMUS-follow-up study

Ricarda Neubauer , Claus-Juergen Bauer , Simon Michael Petzinna , Pantelis Karakostas , Elena Höhne , Charlotte Behning , Valentin Sebastian Schäfer , Florian Recker
{"title":"Evaluating long-term skill retention following teledidactic vs. on-campus musculoskeletal ultrasound training: The TELMUS-follow-up study","authors":"Ricarda Neubauer ,&nbsp;Claus-Juergen Bauer ,&nbsp;Simon Michael Petzinna ,&nbsp;Pantelis Karakostas ,&nbsp;Elena Höhne ,&nbsp;Charlotte Behning ,&nbsp;Valentin Sebastian Schäfer ,&nbsp;Florian Recker","doi":"10.1016/j.wfumbo.2025.100092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) relies on examiner competence, requiring ongoing practice, supervision, and quality assurance. Limited resources and densely packed medical curricula demand effective training methods to ensure long-term skill retention. Teledidatic as well as peer-assisted learning approaches have shown short-term results in training MSUS comparable with conventional in-class teaching. Consequently, this study aimed to evaluate the long-term retention of MSUS skills.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>One year after completing either the teledidactic or conventional course of a standardized MSUS elective (TELMUS study), medical students’ retention of MSUS skills in image acquisition and interpretation was assessed by a repeated objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). The follow-up OSCE scores of the teledidactic cohort and the on-campus cohort were compared to their previous results as well as between the two study groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 24 medical students of the initial 30 (80 %) participated in the follow-up study. In the follow-up OSCE, students enrolled in the teledidactic course achieved an average score of 52.88 (SD ± 6.12), which corresponds to 90.35 % of the results of the post-course assessment. Similarly, the on-campus participating students reached 91.99 % of their post-course OSCE with 52.25 (SD ± 7.45) points. No significant differences could be found between the two teaching cohorts (p &gt; 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Teledidactic teaching formats lead to an equivalent long-term maintenance of practical MSUS skills and serve as a sustainable didactic approach in medical education. The observed decline in skills across both cohorts highlights the critical need for repetition in student ultrasound education, ideally integrated into a longitudinal curriculum.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101281,"journal":{"name":"WFUMB Ultrasound Open","volume":"3 2","pages":"Article 100092"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WFUMB Ultrasound Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294966832500014X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) relies on examiner competence, requiring ongoing practice, supervision, and quality assurance. Limited resources and densely packed medical curricula demand effective training methods to ensure long-term skill retention. Teledidatic as well as peer-assisted learning approaches have shown short-term results in training MSUS comparable with conventional in-class teaching. Consequently, this study aimed to evaluate the long-term retention of MSUS skills.

Materials and methods

One year after completing either the teledidactic or conventional course of a standardized MSUS elective (TELMUS study), medical students’ retention of MSUS skills in image acquisition and interpretation was assessed by a repeated objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). The follow-up OSCE scores of the teledidactic cohort and the on-campus cohort were compared to their previous results as well as between the two study groups.

Results

A total of 24 medical students of the initial 30 (80 %) participated in the follow-up study. In the follow-up OSCE, students enrolled in the teledidactic course achieved an average score of 52.88 (SD ± 6.12), which corresponds to 90.35 % of the results of the post-course assessment. Similarly, the on-campus participating students reached 91.99 % of their post-course OSCE with 52.25 (SD ± 7.45) points. No significant differences could be found between the two teaching cohorts (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

Teledidactic teaching formats lead to an equivalent long-term maintenance of practical MSUS skills and serve as a sustainable didactic approach in medical education. The observed decline in skills across both cohorts highlights the critical need for repetition in student ultrasound education, ideally integrated into a longitudinal curriculum.
评估远程教学与校园肌肉骨骼超声训练后的长期技能保留:telmus -随访研究
目的:肌肉骨骼超声(MSUS)依赖于审查员的能力,需要持续的实践、监督和质量保证。有限的资源和密集的医学课程需要有效的培训方法,以确保长期保留技能。远程教学和同伴辅助学习方法在培训MSUS方面显示出与传统课堂教学相当的短期效果。因此,本研究旨在评估MSUS技能的长期保留。材料和方法在完成标准化MSUS选修课(TELMUS研究)的远程教学或常规课程一年后,通过重复的客观结构化临床检查(OSCE)评估医学生对MSUS图像采集和解释技能的保留情况。将远程教学组和校园组的后续OSCE分数与他们之前的结果以及两个研究组之间的结果进行比较。结果30名医学生中有24人(80%)参加了随访研究。在欧安组织的随访中,参加远程教学课程的学生平均得分为52.88 (SD±6.12),与课程后评估结果的90.35%相对应。同样,校内参与学生达到91.99%的课程后OSCE,得分为52.25 (SD±7.45)分。两组教学组间差异无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。结论远程教学的教学形式能够长期有效地保持医学sus的实用技能,是医学教育中一种可持续的教学方式。观察到的两组学生在技能上的下降突出了在学生超声教育中重复的迫切需要,理想情况下将其整合到纵向课程中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信