Nicky Garsten , Anca Anton , Dalien Rene Benecke , Eugen Glăvan , Anthony Tibaingana
{"title":"A global exploration of workplace well-being in public relations","authors":"Nicky Garsten , Anca Anton , Dalien Rene Benecke , Eugen Glăvan , Anthony Tibaingana","doi":"10.1016/j.pubrev.2025.102622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We explored aspects of workplace well-being from a global Delphi study conducted amongst nearly 300 public relations participants (practitioners, educators and academics) across 24 countries, examining nearly 1500 qualitative responses. Although the study’s panelists were not specifically asked about well-being, they frequently articulated unprompted expressions of purpose, ethical tensions, and professional identity.</div><div>Using a deductive coding framework we analyzed sentiments, triggers, and some interpersonal and intrapersonal measures of <em>eudaimonic</em> well-being across the dataset. Statistical analysis revealed that positive sentiment was most strongly predicted by a sense of success at work and ethical autonomy, while negative sentiment was closely associated with disconnection from management and misalignment between personal values and professional roles. These findings lead us to propose 'profession-practice alignment' as a core condition for sustainable, workplace well-being, with implications for leadership, culture, and retention in PR. Furthermore we link such ‘professional-practice alignment’ to a sense of communitarian purpose in eudaimonic work-place wellbeing.</div><div>The study contributes to a reframing of well-being in PR, rooted in profession-practice alignment, ethical resilience, and the social dynamics of work, highlighting the need for the profession to apply its own relational expertise inward, to support the emotional and ethical conditions of its practitioners.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48263,"journal":{"name":"Public Relations Review","volume":"51 5","pages":"Article 102622"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Relations Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363811125000840","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We explored aspects of workplace well-being from a global Delphi study conducted amongst nearly 300 public relations participants (practitioners, educators and academics) across 24 countries, examining nearly 1500 qualitative responses. Although the study’s panelists were not specifically asked about well-being, they frequently articulated unprompted expressions of purpose, ethical tensions, and professional identity.
Using a deductive coding framework we analyzed sentiments, triggers, and some interpersonal and intrapersonal measures of eudaimonic well-being across the dataset. Statistical analysis revealed that positive sentiment was most strongly predicted by a sense of success at work and ethical autonomy, while negative sentiment was closely associated with disconnection from management and misalignment between personal values and professional roles. These findings lead us to propose 'profession-practice alignment' as a core condition for sustainable, workplace well-being, with implications for leadership, culture, and retention in PR. Furthermore we link such ‘professional-practice alignment’ to a sense of communitarian purpose in eudaimonic work-place wellbeing.
The study contributes to a reframing of well-being in PR, rooted in profession-practice alignment, ethical resilience, and the social dynamics of work, highlighting the need for the profession to apply its own relational expertise inward, to support the emotional and ethical conditions of its practitioners.
期刊介绍:
The Public Relations Review is the oldest journal devoted to articles that examine public relations in depth, and commentaries by specialists in the field. Most of the articles are based on empirical research undertaken by professionals and academics in the field. In addition to research articles and commentaries, The Review publishes invited research in brief, and book reviews in the fields of public relations, mass communications, organizational communications, public opinion formations, social science research and evaluation, marketing, management and public policy formation.