Wassim Daher , Jihad Elnaboulsi , Mahelet G. Fikru , Luis Gautier
{"title":"An analysis of mergers in the presence of uncertainty in renewable energy integration costs","authors":"Wassim Daher , Jihad Elnaboulsi , Mahelet G. Fikru , Luis Gautier","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines how uncertainty in renewable integration costs affects the profitability of mergers among energy producers. As the energy sector shifts toward decentralized renewables, centralized producers face industry-wide and firm-specific cost uncertainties due to the variable and intermittent nature of distributed generation. Although previous models have examined mergers in the presence of greener energy, they have largely assumed deterministic costs and ignored the impact of the dual sources of uncertainty on merger profitability. This study incorporates both industry-wide and private shocks into renewable integration costs, using two theoretical models – without and with uncertainty – to identify how these shocks affect merger profitability. With full information, we show that mergers are unprofitable unless they consolidate a majority of firms (e.g., 90% consolidation), where a higher renewable integration cost reduces losses from mergers. This is because joint profit maximization allows merger participants to better absorb (higher) costs while non-merging firms cut production more sharply. With uncertainty, we find that the effect of the two sources of uncertainties on merger profitability depends on the average grid integration cost, merger size, and quality of private information. In particular, results suggest that mergers are more likely to be profitable when firms can effectively absorb private shocks due to the merger size, unless average grid integration costs become too high. The incentives to merge are less clear-cut in the presence of an industry-wide shock, unless the quality of private information is high enough.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"150 ","pages":"Article 108819"},"PeriodicalIF":14.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325006462","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study examines how uncertainty in renewable integration costs affects the profitability of mergers among energy producers. As the energy sector shifts toward decentralized renewables, centralized producers face industry-wide and firm-specific cost uncertainties due to the variable and intermittent nature of distributed generation. Although previous models have examined mergers in the presence of greener energy, they have largely assumed deterministic costs and ignored the impact of the dual sources of uncertainty on merger profitability. This study incorporates both industry-wide and private shocks into renewable integration costs, using two theoretical models – without and with uncertainty – to identify how these shocks affect merger profitability. With full information, we show that mergers are unprofitable unless they consolidate a majority of firms (e.g., 90% consolidation), where a higher renewable integration cost reduces losses from mergers. This is because joint profit maximization allows merger participants to better absorb (higher) costs while non-merging firms cut production more sharply. With uncertainty, we find that the effect of the two sources of uncertainties on merger profitability depends on the average grid integration cost, merger size, and quality of private information. In particular, results suggest that mergers are more likely to be profitable when firms can effectively absorb private shocks due to the merger size, unless average grid integration costs become too high. The incentives to merge are less clear-cut in the presence of an industry-wide shock, unless the quality of private information is high enough.
期刊介绍:
Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.